Skip to main content
Log in

Correlation Weights in Multiple Regression

  • Theory and Methods
  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A general theory on the use of correlation weights in linear prediction has yet to be proposed. In this paper we take initial steps in developing such a theory by describing the conditions under which correlation weights perform well in population regression models. Using OLS weights as a comparison, we define cases in which the two weighting systems yield maximally correlated composites and when they yield minimally similar weights. We then derive the least squares weights (for any set of predictors) that yield the largest drop in R 2 (the coefficient of determination) when switching to correlation weights. Our findings suggest that two characteristics of a model/data combination are especially important in determining the effectiveness of correlation weights: (1) the condition number of the predictor correlation matrix, R xx , and (2) the orientation of the correlation weights to the latent vectors of R xx .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bring, J. (1994). How to standardize regression coefficients. American Statistician, 48, 209–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J.P. (1974). A Monte Carlo approach to some problems inherent in multivariate prediction with special reference to multiple regression (Technical Report 2002). Personnel Training Research Program. Washington DC: Office of Navel Research.

  • Claudy, J.G. (1972). A comparison of five variable weighting procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32, 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dana, J., & Dawes, R.M. (2004). The superiority of simple alternatives to regression for social science predictions. Journal of Educational and Behavior Statistics, 29, 317–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K.R., & Sauser, W.I. (1991). Effects of alternate weighting methods in a policy-capturing approach to job evaluation: A review and empirical investigation. Personnel Psychology, 44, 85–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnette, M.D., & Borman, W.C. (1979). Personnel selection and classification systems. Annual Review of Psychology, 30, 477–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn, H.J., & Hogarth, R.M. (1975). Unit weighting schemes for decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 171–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C.C. (1979). Intersections of ellipsoids and planes of arbitrary orientation and position. Mathematical Geology, 11, 329–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, G.S. (1996). Monte Carlo: Theory, algorithms and applications. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L.R. (1972). Parameters of personality inventory construction and utilization: A comparison of prediction strategies and tactics. Multivariate Behavioral Research Monographs, 7(2).

  • Goldberger, A.S. (1968). Topics in regression analysis. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B.F. (1977). Parameter sensitivity in multivariate methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 12, 263–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland, S., Schlesselman, J.J., & Criqui, M.H. (1986). The fallacy of employing standardized regression coefficients and correlations as measures of effect. American Journal of Epidemiology, 123, 203–208.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoerl, A.E., & Kennard, R.W. (1970). Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics, 12, 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keren, G., & Newman, J.R. (1978). Additional considerations with regard to multiple regression and equal weighting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 22, 143–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, R.F. (1988). On the sensitivity of a composite to its weights. Psychometrika, 53, 547–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, J.E. (1978). Comment on “Estimating coefficients in linear models: It don’t make no nevermind.” Psychological Bulletin, 85, 247–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, M.R. (1966). Two kinds of regression weights which are better than betas in crossed samples. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York (September).

  • Marsaglia, G., & Olkin, I. (1984). Generating correlation matrices. SIAM: Journal of Scientific and Statistical Computing, 5, 470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Psychological Corporation (1997). WAIS-III WMS-III technical manual. San Antonio, TX: Author.

  • Pruzek, R.M., & Fredrick, B.C. (1978). Weighting procedures in linear models: Alternatives to least squares and limitations of equal weights. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 254–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2007). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN:3-900051-07-0, URL:http://www.R-project.org

  • Raju, N.S., Bilgic, R., Edwards, J.E., & Fleer, P.F. (1997). Methodology review: Estimation of population validity and cross-validity, and the use of equal weights in prediction. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozeboom, W.W. (1979). Sensitivity of a linear composite of predictor items to differential item weighting. Psychometrika, 44, 289–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F.L. (1971). The relative efficiency of regression and simple unit predictor weights in applied differential psychology. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 699–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatsuoka, M.M. (1988). Multivariate analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, H. (1976). Estimating coefficients in linear models: It don’t make no nevermind. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 213–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, H. (1978). On the sensitivity of regression and regressors. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 267–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wesman, A.G., & Bennett, G.K. (1959). Multiple regression vs. simple addition of scores in prediction of college grades. Education and Psychological Measurement, 19, 243–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niels G. Waller.

Additional information

The authors would like to express their appreciation to Drs. Will Grove, Bob Pruzek, Scott Vrieze, and Steve Nydick for helpful comments on a draft of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waller, N.G., Jones, J.A. Correlation Weights in Multiple Regression. Psychometrika 75, 58–69 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9127-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9127-y

Keywords

Navigation