Abstract
In this paper, we show that for some structural equation models (SEM), the classical chi-square goodness-of-fit test is unable to detect the presence of nonlinear terms in the model. As an example, we consider a regression model with latent variables and interactions terms. Not only the model test has zero power against that type of misspecifications, but even the theoretical (chi-square) distribution of the test is not distorted when severe interaction term misspecification is present in the postulated model. We explain this phenomenon by exploiting results on asymptotic robustness in structural equation models. The importance of this paper is to warn against the conclusion that if a proposed linear model fits the data well according to the chi-quare goodness-of-fit test, then the underlying model is linear indeed; it will be shown that the underlying model may, in fact, be severely nonlinear. In addition, the present paper shows that such insensitivity to nonlinear terms is only a particular instance of a more general problem, namely, the incapacity of the classical chi-square goodness-of-fit test to detect deviations from zero correlation among exogenous regressors (either being them observable, or latent) when the structural part of the model is just saturated.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Arminger, G., & Muthén, B. (1998). A Bayesian approach to nonlinear latent variable models using the Gibbs sampler and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. Psychometrika, 63(3), 271–300.
Bauer, D.J. (2005). A semiparametric approach to modeling nonlinear relations among latent variables. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 513–535.
Bollen, K.A., & Paxton, P. (1998a). Interactions of latent variables in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 5, 267–293.
Bollen, K.A., & Paxton, P. (1998b). Two-stage least squares estimation of interaction effects. In R.E. Schumacker & G.A. Marcoulides (Eds.), Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Browne, M.W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 62–83.
Jöreskog, K.G., & Yang, F. (1996). Nonlinear structural equation models: The Kenny-Judd model with interaction effects. In R.E. Marcoulides & G.A. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 57–88). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Jöreskog, K.J., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: Users Reference Guide. Chicago: SSI Scientific Software International, Inc.
Kenny, D.A., & Judd, C.M. (1984). Estimating the nonlinear and interactive effects of latent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 201–210.
Klein, A.G. (2007). QuasiML (Version 3.10). Champaign: Author. [Computer software].
Klein, A.G., & Moosbrugger, H. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65, 457–474.
Lee, S.-Y. (2007). Structural equation modelling: a Bayesian approach. New York: Wiley.
Lee, S.Y., & Zhu, H.T. (2002). Maximum likelihood estimation of nonlinear structural equation models. Psychometrika, 67, 189–210.
Luijben, T.C.W. (1991). Equivalent models in covariance structure analysis. Psychometrika, 56, 653–665.
Marsh, H.W., Wen, Z., & Hau, K.-T. (2004). Structural equation models of latent interactions: Evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychological Methods, 9, 275–300.
Mardia, K.V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57, 519–530.
Mardia, K.V. (1974). Applications of some measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis in testing normality and robustness studies. Sankhya, Series B, 36, 115–128.
Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (1998–2007). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Satorra, A. (1989). Alternative test criteria in covariance structure analysis: a unified approach. Psychometrika, 54, 131–151.
Satorra, A. (1990). Robustness issues in structural equation modeling: a review of recent developments. Quality & Quantity, 24, 367–386.
Satorra, A. (2002). Asymptotic robustness in multiple group linear-latent variable models. Econometric Theory, 18, 297–312.
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P.M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. van Eye & C.C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variable analysis in developmental research (pp. 285–305). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Satorra, A., & Saris, W.E. (1985). Power of the likelihood ratio test in covariance structure analysis. Psychometrika, 50(1), 83–89.
Wall, M.M., & Amemiya, Y. (2003). A method of moment technique for fitting interaction effects in structural equation models. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 56, 47–63.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Research of the second author is supported by the grants SEJ2006-13537 and PR2007-0221 from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Mooijaart, A., Satorra, A. On Insensitivity of the Chi-Square Model Test to Nonlinear Misspecification in Structural Equation Models. Psychometrika 74, 443–455 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9112-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9112-5