Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Doubly Robust-Type Estimation for Covariate Adjustment in Latent Variable Modeling

  • Theory and Methods
  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to the difficulty in achieving a random assignment, a quasi-experimental or observational study design is frequently used in the behavioral and social sciences. If a nonrandom assignment depends on the covariates, multiple group structural equation modeling, that includes the regression function of the dependent variables on the covariates that determine the assignment, can provide reasonable estimates under the condition of correct specification of the regression function. However, it is usually difficult to specify the correct regression function because the dimensions of the dependent variables and covariates are typically large. Therefore, the propensity score adjustment methods have been proposed, since they do not require the specification of the regression function and have been applied to several applied studies. However, these methods produce biased estimates if the assignment mechanism is incorrectly specified. In order to make a more robust inference, it would be more useful to develop an estimation method that integrates the regression approach with the propensity score methodology. In this study we propose a doubly robust-type estimation method for marginal multiple group structural equation modeling. This method provides a consistent estimator if either the regression function or the assignment mechanism is correctly specified. A simulation study indicates that the proposed estimation method is more robust than the existing methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bang, H., & Robins, J.M. (2005). Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models. Biometrics, 61, 962–972.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P.M. (1983). Some contributions to efficient statistics in structural equation models: Specification and estimation of moment structure. Psychometrika, 48, 493–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, R.J., Ruppert, D., & Stefanski, L.A. (1995). Measurement error in nonlinear models. New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, P.E. (1994). Nonparametric estimation of mean functionals with data missing at random. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, B.R. (1983). Uniqueness and Fŕechet differentiability of functional solutions to maximum likelihood-type equations. Annals of Statistics, 11, 1196–1205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G.M. (1987). A simplified approach to M-estimation with application to two-stage estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 34, 373–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, G., & Samaniego, F.J. (1981). Pseudo maximum likelihood estimation: Theory and applications. Annals of Statistics, 9, 861–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heritier, S., & Ronchetti, E. (1994). Robust bounded-influence tests in general parametric models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 897–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz, D.G., & Thompson, D.J. (1952). A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47, 663–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoshino, T., Kurata, H., & Shigemasu, K. (2006). A propensity score adjustment for multiple group structural equation modeling. Psychometrika, 71, 691–712. DOI: 10.1007/s11336-005-1370-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, P.J. (1967). The behavior of the maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. In L. LeCam, & J. Neyman (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability (Vol. 1, pp. 221–233). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, P.J. (1981). Robust statistics. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Imbens, G.W. (2000). The role of the propensity score in estimating dose–response functions. Biometrika, 87, 706–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K.G. (1970). A general method for the analysis of covariance structure. Biometrika, 57, 239–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K.G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36, 409–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kano, Y., Berkane, M., & Bentler, P.M. (1993). Statistical inference based on pseudo-maximum likelihood estimators in elliptical populations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, J.F., Kalbfleisch, J.D., & Wild, C.J. (1999). Semiparametric methods for response-selective and missing data problems in regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 61, 413–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, K.-Y., & Self, S.G. (1996). On the asymptotic behavior of the pseudolikelihood ratio test statistic. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 58, 785–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsitz, S.R., Ibrahim, J.G., & Zhao, L.P. (1999). A weighted estimating equation for missing covariate data with properties similar to maximum likelihood. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 1147–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnus, J.R., & Neudecker, H. (1999). Matrix differential calculus with applications in statistics and econometrics (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P.R. (1987). Model-based direct adjustment. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 387–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P.R., & Rubin, D.B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotnitzky, A., & Robins, J.M. (1995). Semiparametric regression estimation in the presence of dependent censoring. Biometrika, 82, 805–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D.B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D.B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63, 581–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D.B. (1985). The use of propensity scores in applied Bayesian inference. In J.M. Bernardo, M.H. DeGroot, D.V. Lindley, & A.F.M. Smith (Eds.), Bayesian statistics 2 (pp. 463–472). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D.B. (2005). Causal inference using potential outcomes: design, modeling, decisions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100, 322–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharfstein, D.O., Rotnitzky, A., & Robins, J.M. (1999). Adjusting for nonignorable drop-out using semiparametric nonresponse models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 1096–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sörbom, D. (1974). A general method for studying differences in factor means and factor structures between groups. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 229–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Laan, M.J., & Robins, J.M. (2002). Unified methods for censored longitudinal data and causality. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1982). Maximum likelihood estimation under mis-specified models. Econometrica, 50, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P.M. (1997). Mean and covariance structure analysis: Theoretical and practical improvements. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92, 767–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cognitive and Behavioral Science, The University of Tokyo, 4-3-5 yanaka, Taito-ku, Tokyo, 110-0001, Japan

    Takahiro Hoshino

Authors
  1. Takahiro Hoshino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takahiro Hoshino.

Additional information

This research was partially supported by the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B), 187-30406.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoshino, T. Doubly Robust-Type Estimation for Covariate Adjustment in Latent Variable Modeling. Psychometrika 72, 535–549 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-007-9007-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-007-9007-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation