Skip to main content
Log in

Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and Mcdonald’s ω H : their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript


We make theoretical comparisons among five coefficients—Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, McDonald’s ω h , and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Though many end users and psychometricians alike may not distinguish among these five coefficients, we demonstrate formally their nonequivalence. Specifically, whereas there are conditions under which α, β, and ω h are equivalent to each other and to one of the two conceptualizations of reliability considered here, we show that equality with this conceptualization of reliability and between α and ω h holds only under a highly restrictive set of conditions and that the conditions under which β equals ω h are only somewhat more general. The nonequivalence of α, β, and ω h suggests that important information about the psychometric properties of a scale may be missing when scale developers and users only report α as is almost always the case

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others


  • Blalock H. M. (1970) Estimating measurement error using multiple indicators and several points in time. American Sociological Review, 35:101–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen K. (1989) Structural Equations With Latent Variables. New York: Wiley Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen K., Lennox R. (1991) Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110:305–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach L. J. (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16:297–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Green S. B., Hershberger S. L. (2000) Correlated errors in true score models and their effect on coefficient alpha. Structural Equation Modeling, 7:251–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green S. B., Lissitz R. W., Mulaik S. A. (1977) Limitations of coefficient alpha as an index of test unidimensionality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37:827–838

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise D. R. (1969) Separating reliability and stability in test-retest correlation. American Sociological Review, 34:93–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog K. G. (1974) Analyzing psychological data by structural analysis of covariance matrices. In R. C. Atkinson, D. H. Krantz, R. D. Luce, P. Suppes (Eds), Contemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology (pp. 1–56) San Francisco: Freeman

    Google Scholar 

  • Komaroff E. (1997) Effect of simultaneous violations of essential tau—equvalence and uncorrelated error on coefficient alpha. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21:337–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord F. M. (1955) Sampling fluctuations resulting from the sampling of test items. Psychometrika, 20:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord F. M., Novick M. R. (1968) Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores (with contributions by A. Birnbaum) Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald R. P. (1970) The theoretical foundations of principal factor analysis, canonical factor analysis and alpha factor analysis. British Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 23:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald R. P. (1978) Generalizability in factorable domains: “Domain validity and generalizability.” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38:75–79

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald R. P. (1985) Factor Analysis and Related Methods. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald R. P. (1999) Test Theory: A Unified Treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Novick, M. R., Lewis C. (1967) Coefficient alpha and the reliability of composite measurements. Psychometrika, 32:1–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raykov T. (1997) Scale reliability, Cronbach’s coefficient alpha, and violations of essential tau-equivalence with fixed congeneric components. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32:329–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Raykov T. (1998a) Coefficient alpha and composite reliability with interrelated nonhomogeneous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22:375–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Raykov T. (1998b) A method for obtaining standard errors and confidence intervals of composite reliability for congeneric items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22:369–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Raykov T. (2001a) Bias of coefficient alpha for fixed congeneric measures with correlated errors. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25:69–76

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Raykov T. (2001b) Estimation of congeneric scale reliability using covariance structure analysis with nonlinear constraints. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 54:315–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raykov T. (2002) Analytic estimation of standard error and confidence interval for scale reliability. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37:89–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raykov T., Shrout P. E. (2002) Reliability of scales with general structure: Point and interval estimation using a structured equation modeling approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 9:195–212

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Revelle W. (1979) Hierarchical cluster analysis and the internal structure of tests. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14:57–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid J., Leiman J. M. (1957) The development of hierarchical factor solutions. Psychometrika, 22:53–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley D. E., Wiley J. A. (1970) The estimation of measurement error in panel data. American Sociological Review, 35:112–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker L. (1940) The role of correlated factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 5:141–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Wherry R. J. (1959) Hierarchical factor solutions without rotation. Psychometrika, 24:45–51

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard E. Zinbarg.

Additional information

Preparation of this article was supported by the Patricia M Nielsen Research Chair of the Family Institute at Northwestern University

We thank Lewis R. Goldberg, Win Hill, Dan McAdams, Tony Z. Tang and especially Roderick P. McDonald for their comments on earlier drafts of portions of this article

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zinbarg, R.E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I. et al. Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and Mcdonald’s ω H : their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika 70, 123–133 (2005).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: