Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal Partitioning of Testing Time: Theoretical Properties and Practical Implications

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with optimal partitioning of limited testing time in order to achieve maximum total test score. Nonlinear optimization theory was used to analyze this problem. A general case using a generic item response model is first presented. A special case that applies a response time model proposed by Wang and Hanson (2005) is also presented. Theoretical properties of the optimal solution are derived. Their practical implications to optimal test-taking strategies are also discussed. The theoretical properties are in general agreement with the conventional advice to the examinees on pacing strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  • Bertsekas, D.P. (1999). Nonlinear programming (2nd ed.) Belmont, MA: Athena Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrens, W.A., Popham, W.J., & Ryan, J.M. (1998). How to prepare students for performance assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice, 17, 18–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millman, J. (1969). How to take tests. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millman, J., Bishop, H.I., & Ebel, R. (1965). An analysis of test wiseness. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 25, 707–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redencich, M.C. (1985). S.T.A.R.: A strategy for taking timed tests. Forum for Reading, 17, 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P.R. (1987). Comparing item characteristic curves. Psychometrika, 52, 217–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roskam, E.E. (1997). Models for speed and time-limit tests. In W.J. van der Linden & R.K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 187–208). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sijtsma, K. (2001). Developments in measurement of persons and items by means of item response models. Behaviormetrika, 28, 65–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vattanapath, R., & Jaiprayoon, K. (1999, December). An assessment of the effectiveness of the teaching test-taking strategies for multiple-choice English reading comprehension tests. (SLLT Occasional Papers, Vol. 8.) Bangkok, Thailand: Department of Foreign Languages, Mahidol University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhelst, N.D., Verstralen, H.H.F.M., & Jansen, M.G.H. (1997). A logistic model for time-limit tests. In W.J. van der Linden & R.K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 169–185). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T., & Hanson, B.A. (2005). Development and calibration of an item response model that incorporates response time. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 323–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tianyou Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, T., Zhang, J. Optimal Partitioning of Testing Time: Theoretical Properties and Practical Implications. Psychometrika 71, 105–120 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-002-1013-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-002-1013-x

Keywords

Navigation