Abstract
The authors introduce subset conjunction as a classification rule by which an acceptable alternative must satisfy some minimum number of criteria. The rule subsumes conjunctive and disjunctive decision strategies as special cases.
Subset conjunction can be represented in a binary-response model, for example, in a logistic regression, using only main effects or only interaction effects. This results in a confounding of the main and interaction effects when there is little or no response error. With greater response error, a logistic regression, even if it gives a good fit to data, can produce parameter estimates that do not reflect the underlying decision process. The authors propose a model in which the binary classification of alternatives into acceptable/unacceptable categories is based on a probabilistic implementation of a subset-conjunctive process. The satisfaction of decision criteria biases the odds toward one outcome or the other. The authors then describe a two-stage choice model in which a (possibly large) set of alternatives is first reduced using a subset-conjunctive rule, after which an alternative is selected from this reduced set of items. They describe methods for estimating the unobserved consideration probabilities from classification and choice data, and illustrate the use of the models for cancer diagnosis and consumer choice. They report the results of simulations investigating estimation accuracy, incidence of local optima, and model fit.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, R.L., & Srinivasan, T.C. (1995). Studying consideration effects in empirical choice models using scanner panel data. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 30–41.
Barthelemy, J.-P., & Mullet, E. (1987). A polynomial model for expert categorical data. In E.E. Roskam, & R. Suck (Eds.), Progress in Mathematical Psychology, Vol. I, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Barthelemy, J.-P., & Mullet, E. (1996). Information processing in similarity judgements. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 49, 225–240.
Ben-Akiva, M., & Lerman, S.R. (1993). Discrete choice analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Boros, E., Hammer, P.L., & Hooker, J.N. (1994). Predicting cause–effect relationships from incomplete discrete observations. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, 7, 531–543.
Boros, E., Hammer, P., & Hooker, J.N. (1995). Boolean regression. Annals of Operations Research, 58, 201–226.
Coombs, C.H. (1951). Mathematical models in psychological scaling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 46 (256), 480–489.
Cooper, L.G. (1993). Market-share models. In J. Eliashberg, & G. L. Lillien (Eds.), Handbooks of Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 5, Marketing, (pp. 257–313). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Crama, Y., Hammer, P.L., & Ibaraki, T. (1988). Cause–effect relationships and partially defined Boolean functions. Annals of Operations Research, 16, 299–325.
Dawes, R.M. (1979). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American Psychologist, 34, 571–582.
Dawes, R.M., & Corrigan, B. (1974). Linear models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 95–106.
Einhorn, H.J. (1970). The use of nonlinear compensatory models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 221–230.
Gradshteyn, I.S., Ryzhik, I.M., & Jeffrey, A. (1994). Tables of integrals, series and products (5th ed.), San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Grether, D., & Wilde, L. (1984). An analysis of conjunctive choice: Theory and experiments. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(4), 373–386.
Huber, J., & Klein, N. (1991). Adapting cutoffs to the choice environment: The effects of attribute correlation and reliability. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 346–357.
Leenen, I., & Van Mechelen, I. (1998). A branch-and-bound algorithm for Boolean regression. In I. Balderjahn, R. Mathar, & M. Schader (Eds.), Data highways and information flooding: A challenge for classification and data analysis (pp. 164–171. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Luce, R. (1959). Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. New York: Wiley.
Lussier, D.A., & Olshavsky, R.W. (1979). Task complexity and contingent processing in brand choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 6 (2), 154–165.
Maddala, G.S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McFadden, D. (1973). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics. New York: Academic Press.
Maris, E. (1999). Estimating multiple classification latent class models. Psychometrika, 64 (2), 187–212.
Mela, C., & Lehmann, D.R. (1995). Using fuzzy set theoretic techniques to identify preference rules from interactions in the linear model: An empirical study. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 71, 165–181.
Montgomery, H. (1983). Decision rules and the search for a dominance structure: Toward a process model of decision-making. In P.C. Humphrey, O. Svenson, & A. Vari (Eds.), Analyzing and aiding decision process. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Payne, J.W. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 366–387.
Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R., & Johnson, E.L. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 534–552.
Rao, C.R. (1973). Linear statistical inference and its applications (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Roberts, J., & Lattin, J. (1991). Development and testing of a model of consideration set composition. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 429–440.
Swait, J. (2001). A non-compensatory choice model incorporating attribute cut-offs. Transportation Research Part B, 35, 903–925.
Teigen, K.H., Martinussen, M., & Lund, T. (1996). Linda versus World Cup: Conjunctive probabilities in three-event fictional and real-life predictions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 9, 77–93.
Van Mechelen, I. (1988). Prediction of a dichotomous criterion variable by means of a logical combination of dichotomous predictors. Mathematiques, informatiques et sciences humaines, 102, 47–54.
Westenberg, M.R.M., & Koele, P. (1994). Multi-attribute evaluation processes: Methodological and conceptual issues. Acta Psychologica, 87, 65–84.
Wolberg, W.H., Street, W.N., Heisey, D.M., & Mangasarian, O.L. (1995). Computerized breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis from fine needle aspirates. Archives of Surgery, 130, 511–516.
Wright, P.L. (1975). Consumer choice strategies: Simplifying versus optimizing. Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 60–67.
Wright, P.L., & Barbour, F. (1977). Phased decision strategies: Sequels to an initial screening. In M.K. Starr, & M. Zeleny (Eds.), TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, (Vol. 6, pp. 91–109). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors thank the Editor, the Associate Editor, and three anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions, and also thank Asim Ansari and Raghuram Iyengar for their helpful comments. They also thank Sawtooth Software, McKinsey and Company, and Intelliquest for providing the PC choice data, and the University of Wisconsin for making the breast-cancer data available at the machine learning archives.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kohli, R., Jedidi, K. Probabilistic Subset Conjunction. Psychometrika 70, 737–757 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-002-0978-8
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-002-0978-8