Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Test–retest reliability of drop jumps in students aged seven and eight: exploratory investigation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sport Sciences for Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The drop jump test has been widely used for adolescent and adult athletes to monitor improvements in reactive strength index. However, little research has examined the use or reliability of drop jumps assessment with primary school children. Therefore, we aimed to assess the test–retest reliability of reactive strength index (RSI) tests in healthy physical education students within the primary school setting.

Methods

Twelve students (six females and six males) aged seven and eight years were tested in two sessions one week apart. Familiarization sessions took place before the main trials. The test protocol included drops jumps from 10 cm, 20 cm and 30 cm box heights and RSI was calculated by dividing jump height (cm) by contact time (s).

Results

Good to excellent intra-session reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.80) was noted at both testing sessions for the RSI obtained after drop jumps from 10, 20, 30 cm box heights. The intersession reliability for drop jumps from all heights was high, with no significant difference between the two sessions (r = 0.81–0.97, p = 0.30–0.94).

Conclusion

RSI assessment through low–moderate drop jump heights shows good potential to be a reliable method. Current findings could be of value to teachers assessing the effectiveness of resistance training movement activities in the physical education program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Available upon request.

References

  1. Jaakkola T et al (2015) Fundamental movement skills and physical fitness as predictors of physical activity: a 6-year follow-up study: motor skills, fitness, and physical activity. Scand J Med Sci Sports. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Larsen LR et al (2015) Motor performance as predictor of physical activity in children: the CHAMPS study-DK. Med Sci Sports Exerc 47(9):1849–1856. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000000604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nobre G et al (2016) Twelve-weeks of plyometric training improves motor performance of 7–10 year old overweight/obese boys: a randomized controlled intervention. J Strength Cond Res 31:1. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Slotte S et al (2021) Associations of muscular fitness and body composition in children. Early Child Dev Care. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2021.1982928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lima TR et al (2021) Association between muscle strength and risk factors for metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents: a systematic review. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metabol 34(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpem-2020-0135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sortwell A et al (2021) The effects of an eight week plyometric-based program on motor performance skills and muscular power in 7–8-year-old primary school students. Int J Kinesiol Sports Sci 9(4):1–12. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijkss.v.9n.4p.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mian OS et al (2006) Metabolic cost, mechanical work, and efficiency during walking in young and older men. Acta Physiol 186(2):127–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.2006.01522.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Clark JE, Phillips SJ (1991) The development of intralimb coordination in the first six months of walking. In: Jacqueline F, Peter HW (eds) Advances in psychology, vol 81. Elsevier, North-Holland, pp 245–257

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thelen E (1985) Developmental origins of motor coordination: leg movements in human infants. Dev Psychobiol 18(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.420180102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Laffaye G et al (2016) Age- and gender-related development of stretch shortening cycle during a sub-maximal hopping task. Biol Sport 33(1):29–35. https://doi.org/10.5604/20831862.1180169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Temfemo A et al (2009) Relationship between vertical jumping performance and anthropometric characteristics during growth in boys and girls. Eur J Pediatr 168(4):457–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-008-0771-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grigore V, Courteix D, Patikas D (2014) 3rd international congress on physical education, sport and kinetotherapy (ICPESK 2013) stretch shortening cycle in childhood. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 117:60–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Padulo J, Laffaye G, Chamari K (2013) Concentric and eccentric: muscle contraction or exercise? J Sports Sci Med 12(3):608–609

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Komi PV (2000) Stretch-shortening cycle: a powerful model to study normal and fatigued muscle. J Biomech 33(10):1197–1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00064-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Franchi MV, Reeves ND, Narici MV (2017) Skeletal muscle remodeling in response to eccentric vs. concentric loading: morphological, molecular, and metabolic adaptations. Front Physiol 8:447–447. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00447

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Duncan MJ, Eyre ELJ, Oxford SW (2018) The effects of 10-week integrated neuromuscular training on fundamental movement skills and physical self-efficacy in 6–7-year-old children. J Strength Cond Res 32(12):3348–3356. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000001859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nobre GG et al (2017) Twelve weeks of plyometric training improves motor performance of 7- to 9-year-old boys who were overweight/obese: a randomized controlled intervention. J Strength Cond Res 31(8):2091–2099. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000001684

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Markovic G, Mikulic P (2010) Neuro-musculoskeletal and performance adaptations to lower-extremity plyometric training. Sports Med (Auckland NZ) 40:859–95. https://doi.org/10.2165/11318370-000000000-00000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bogdanis GC et al (2019) Effect of plyometric training on jumping, sprinting and change of direction speed in child female athletes. Sports (Basel, Switzerland) 7(5):116. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports7050116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wiersma LD, Sherman CP (2008) The responsible use of youth fitness testing to enhance student motivation, enjoyment, and performance. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci 12(3):167–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/10913670802216148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Flanagan E, Comyns T (2008) The use of contact time and the reactive strength index to optimize fast stretch-shortening cycle training. Strength Cond J 30:32–38. https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0b013e318187e25b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ebben WP, Petushek EJ (2010) Using the reactive strength index modified to evaluate plyometric performance. J Strength Cond Res 24(8):1983–1987. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e72466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Flanagan EP, Comyns TM (2008) The use of contact time and the reactive strength index to optimize fast stretch-shortening cycle training. Strength Cond J 30(5):32–38. https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0b013e318187e25b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Young W (1995) Laboratory strength assessment of athletes. New Stud Athlet 10:89–89

    Google Scholar 

  25. Aagaard P et al (2002) Increased rate of force development and neural drive of human skeletal muscle following resistance training. J Appl Physiol 93(4):1318–1326. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00283.2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Diallo O et al (2001) Effects of plyometric training followed by a reduced training programme on physical performance in prepubescent soccer players. J Sports Med Phys Fit 41(3):342–348

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Markovic S et al (2013) Jump training with different loads: effects on jumping performance and power output. Eur J Appl Physiol 113(10):2511–2521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-013-2688-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Faigenbaum A et al (2007) Effects of a short-term plyometric and resistance training program on fitness performance in boys age 12 to 15 years. J Sports Sci Med 6(4):519–525

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Behrens M et al (2016) Plyometric training improves voluntary activation and strength during isometric, concentric and eccentric contractions. J Sci Med Sport 19(2):170–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2015.01.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Alkjaer T et al (2013) Neuromuscular adaptations to 4 weeks of intensive drop jump training in well-trained athletes. Physiol Rep 1(5):e00099–e00099. https://doi.org/10.1002/phy2.99

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Oxfeldt M et al (2019) Effects of plyometric training on jumping, sprint performance, and lower body muscle strength in healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Scand J Med Sci Sports 29(10):1453–1465. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bosquet L, Berryman N, Dupuy O (2009) A comparison of 2 optical timing systems designed to measure flight time and contact time during jumping and hopping. J Strength Cond Res Natl Strength Cond Assoc 23:2660–2665. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b1f4ff

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ramirez-Campillo R et al (2018) Optimal reactive strength index: is it an accurate variable to optimize plyometric training effects on measures of physical fitness in young soccer players? The J Strength Cond Res 32:884–893. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tenelsen F et al (2019) Validity and reliability of an electronic contact mat for drop jump assessment in physically active adults. Sports (Basel, Switzerland) 7(5):114. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports7050114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Markwick WJ et al (2015) The intraday reliability of the reactive strength index calculated from a drop jump in professional men’s basketball. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 10(4):482–488. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2014-0265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Thams L et al (2021) Test-retest reliability of muscle strength and physical function tests in 6–9-year-old children. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci 25(4):379–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2021.1943400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pain MT (2014) Considerations for single and double leg drop jumps: bilateral deficit, standardizing drop height, and equalizing training load. J Appl Biomech 30(6):722–727. https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2014-0035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Markwick W et al (2014) The intraday reliability of the reactive strength index (RSI) calculated from a drop jump in professional men’s basketball. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2014-0265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bredin SSD et al (2013) PAR-Q+ and ePARmed-X+: new risk stratification and physical activity clearance strategy for physicians and patients alike. Can Fam Phys Med Fam Can 59(3):273–277

    Google Scholar 

  40. Booth ML et al (2005) Methods of the NSW schools physical activity and nutrition survey (SPANS). J Sci Med Sport 8(3):284–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1440-2440(05)80039-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. National Health and Medical Research Council (2013) Clinical practice guidelines for the management of overweight and obesity in adults, adolescents and children in Australia. National Health and Medical Research Council, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  42. Whitmer TD et al (2015) Accuracy of a vertical jump contact mat for determining jump height and flight time. J Strength Cond Res 29(4):877–881. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000000542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rogan S et al (2015) Validity study of a jump mat compared to the reference standard force plate. Asian J Sports Med 6(4):e25561. https://doi.org/10.5812/asjsm.25561

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Makaruk H, Sacewicz T (2011) The effect of drop height and body mass on drop jump intensity. Biol Sport. https://doi.org/10.5604/935873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Acero RM et al (2011) Reliability of squat and countermovement jump tests in children 6 to 8 years of age. Pediatr Exerc Sci 23(1):151–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Currell K, Jeukendrup AE (2008) Validity, reliability and sensitivity of measures of sporting performance. Sports Med 38(4):297–316. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200838040-00003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bogataj Š et al (2020) Validity, reliability, and usefulness of my jump 2 app for measuring vertical jump in primary school children. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17:3708. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103708

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Swinton PA et al (2018) A statistical framework to interpret individual response to intervention: paving the way for personalized nutrition and exercise prescription. Front Nutr 5:41–41. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2018.00041

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Birat A et al (2020) Effect of drop height on vertical jumping performance in pre-, circa-, and post-pubertal boys and girls. Pediatr Exerc Sci 32(1):23–29. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.2019-0120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Byrne D et al (2016) The inter-day reliability of reactive strength index and optimal drop height. J Strength Cond Res 31:1. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Lloyd RS et al (2009) Reliability and validity of field-based measures of leg stiffness and reactive strength index in youths. J Sports Sci 27(14):1565–1573. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410903311572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Acero R et al (2011) Reliability of squat and countermovement jump tests in children 6 to 8 years of age. Pediatr Exerc Sci 23:151–160. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.23.1.151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia

    Andrew Sortwell

  2. Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences Laboratory, School of Physical Therapy, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile

    Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo

Authors
  1. Andrew Sortwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Sortwell.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Ethical approval

Approval from the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Wollongong for this study. The study was conducted in accordance with the provisions of the declaration of Helsinki.

Informed consent

The participants and their parents were given both oral and written information about the study, and they both provided signed informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sortwell, A., Ramirez-Campillo, R. Test–retest reliability of drop jumps in students aged seven and eight: exploratory investigation. Sport Sci Health 18, 1379–1385 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-022-00909-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-022-00909-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation