While the popularity of pedal-assist electric bikes (eBikes) generally is growing, electric-mountain bikes (eMTB) have not received a warm welcome by many within the mountain biking community. Anecdotally, a variety of concerns have been raised concerning eMTB use, including trail damage, trail conflict, decreased trail access, and the perception that eMTB use is not “real” mountain biking or is “cheating.”
This qualitative study involved extracting and thematically analyzing discussion thread comments about eMTBs among nine mountain biking Facebook pages,
Three predominant themes emerged: What is an eMTB?, Trails, and How should eMTBs be used? There was general confusion about the features and capabilities of eMTBs except by those who had previously used one. Commenters expressed concern over a variety of trail-related issues, including that eMTBs will damage trails similar to the way motorized vehicles do and that they could cause restricted access to some trail systems. There were inconsistent opinions on the use of eMTBs, where some comments saw riding mountain bikes as a “rite of passage” and that using an eMTB was “cheating”. There was some level of acknowledgement that eMTBs may be useful for promoting exercise, but this was mediated by the “rite of passage” belief.
These findings confirm general attitudes around eMTBs including fears, concerns, and prejudices. This study includes insights that will be useful in efforts to promote eMTBs for recreation, a tool to increase levels of physical activity, and in discussing potential conflicts about trail use.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
NPD (2018) Bicycle Industry Trends. https://www.npd.com/wps/portal/npd/us/news/press-releases/2018/the-us-bike-specialty-market-pedals-ahead-with-mountain-and-electric-bicycles-leading-the-pack/. Accessed 22 Jan 2019
Outdoor Industry Association (2018) 2018 Outdoor Participation Report. https://outdoorindustry.org/resource/2018-outdoor-participation-report/. Accessed 22 Jan 2019
MacArthur J, Dill J, Person M (2014) Electric bikes in North America. Transp Res Rec 2468:123–130. https://doi.org/10.3141/2468-14
Bai L, Liu P, Guo Y, Yu H (2015) Comparative analysis of risky behaviors of electric bicycles at signalized intersections. Traffic Inj Prev 16:424–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2014.952724
Boele-Vos MJ, Commandeur JJF, Twisk DAM (2017) Effect of physical effort on mental workload of cyclists in real traffic in relation to age and use of pedelecs. Accid Anal Prev 105:84–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.11.025
Du W, Yang J, Powis B et al (2013) Understanding on-road practices of electric bike riders: an observational study in a developed city of China. Accid Anal Prev 59:319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.011
Feng Z, Raghuwanshi RP, Xu Z et al (2010) Electric-bicycle-related injury: a rising traffic injury burden in China. Inj Prev 16:417–419. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2009.024646
Langford BC, Chen J, Cherry CR (2015) Risky riding: naturalistic methods comparing safety behavior from conventional bicycle riders and electric bike riders. Accid Anal Prev 82:220–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.05.016
Gojanovic B, Welker J, Iglesias K et al (2011) Electric bicycles as a new active transportation modality to promote health. Med Sci Sports Exerc 43:2204–2210. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821cbdc8
Simons M, Van Es E, Hendriksen I (2009) Electrically assisted cycling: a new mode for meeting physical activity guidelines? Med Sci Sports Exerc 41:2097–2102. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181a6aaa4
Berntsen S, Malnes L, Langåker A, Bere E (2017) Physical activity when riding an electric assisted bicycle. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 14:55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0513-z
Louis J, Brisswalter J, Morio C et al (2012) The Electrically Assisted bicycle: an alternative way to promote physical activity. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 91:931–940. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e318269d9bb
Peterman JE, Morris KL, Kram R, Byrnes WC (2016) Pedelecs as a physically active transportation mode. Eur J Appl Physiol 116:1565–1573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-016-3408-9
Sperlich B, Zinner C, Hébert-Losier K et al (2012) Biomechanical, cardiorespiratory, metabolic and perceived responses to electrically assisted cycling. Eur J Appl Physiol 112:4015–4025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-012-2382-0
Hoj TH, Bramwell JJ, Lister C et al (2018) Increasing active transportation through e-bike use: pilot study comparing the health benefits, attitudes, and beliefs surrounding e-bikes and conventional bikes. JMIR Public Health Surv. https://doi.org/10.2196/10461
Blumenstein T, Zeitlmann H, Alves-Pinto A et al (2014) Optimization of electric bicycle for youths with disabilities. SpringerPlus 3:646. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-646
Twisk DAM, Platteel S, Lovegrove GR (2017) An experiment on rider stability while mounting: comparing middle-aged and elderly cyclists on pedelecs and conventional bicycles. Accid Anal Prev 105:109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.004
Guest G, Namey EE, Mitchell ML (2013) Participant observation. Collecting qualitative data: a field manual for applied research. SAGE Publications Ltd, Thousand Oaks, pp 75–112
QSR International (2018) NVivo qualitative data analysis software for mac. Available from https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo/nvivo-products. Accessed 18 June 2018
International Mountain Bicycling Association (2015) Electric mountain bicycle regulations for natural surface trails. Available from https://b.3cdn.net/bikes/d4d3792f3643272682_2nm6b4ec8.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan 2019
International Mountain Bicycling Association (2015) A comparison of environmental impacts from mountain bicycles, Class 1 electric mountain bicycles, and motorcycles: soil displacement and erosion on bike-optimized trails in western Oregon forest. Available from https://b.3cdn.net/bikes/c3fe8a28f1a0f32317_g3m6bdt7g.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan 2019
Brownell KD, Kersh R, Ludwig DS et al (2010) Personal responsibility and obesity: a constructive approach to a controversial issue. Health Aff (Millwood) 29:379–387. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0739
Goldberg DS (2012) Social justice, health inequalities and methodological individualism in US health promotion. Public Health Ethics 5:104–115. https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phs013
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with ethical standards of the institutional research committee (BYU IRB) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. In consultation with BYU IRB, this study did not undergo formal review because data were collected from the public domain involving de-identified, anonymous comments.
Informed consent was not obtained because the researchers were not intervening, interacting, or questioning participants in anyway. Their comments were entirely anonymous and in the public domain.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Chaney, R.A., Hall, P.C., Crowder, A.R. et al. Mountain biker attitudes and perceptions of eMTBs (electric-mountain bikes). Sport Sci Health 15, 577–583 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-019-00555-z
- Public health
- Physical activity