Sport Sciences for Health

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 175–181 | Cite as

Associations of motor abilities with biological, sociodemographic, and behavioural factors in children: results from the ToyBox study

  • Julia BirnbaumEmail author
  • Christine Geyer
  • Franca F. Kirchberg
  • Meike Beulshausen
  • Yannis Manios
  • Berthold Koletzko
  • On behalf of the ToyBox-study group
Original Article



In this cross-sectional study, we examined the association of selected basic motor abilities with biological (sex, age, and BMI), sociodemographic [socio-economic status (SES), migration status], and behavioural factors (membership of sport club) in children aged 3–6 years.


We performed two motor tests, jumping from side to side (JSS) and standing long jump (SLJ) along with the anthropometric measurements in 1598 children (age 4.6 ± 0.70 years; 51% boys) from 58 kindergartens in Germany. GEE models were applied to examine cross-sectional associations between motor abilities and biological, sociodemographic, and behavioural factors.


Age was significant positively related to both tests, JSS (p < 0.001) and SLJ (p < 0.001). Boys reached significantly better results in SLJ (p < 0.001) but not in JSS. Children being member of a sport club performed better than those who were not (SLJ: p < 0.001, JSS: p < 0.001). BMI was inversely related to SLJ (p = 0.014) and tended to be inversely related to JSS (p = 0.64). No significant associations of migration background or SES with motor abilities were found.


When designing effective promotion and teaching strategies targeting children’s motor abilities, information on age and gender differences should be taken into account. Preschool children may benefit from being member in sport clubs. Lower scores of motor abilities in children with higher BMI underline the importance to act early in childhood for prevention.


Motor ability Kindergarten Preschool children 



Body mass index


Socio-economic status


Jumping from side to side


Standing long jump


Physical activity


Standard deviation


Generalized estimating equation model



The ToyBox study has been funded by the Seventh Framework Programme (CORDIS FP7) of the European Commission under Grant agreement no. 245200. The content of this article reflects only the authors’ views and the European Community is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. The ToyBox study group consist of: Co-ordinator: Yannis Manios. Steering Committee: Yannis Manios, Berthold Koletzko, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, Mai Chin A Paw, Luis Moreno, Carolyn Summerbell, Tim Lobstein, Lieven Annemans, Goof Buijs. External Advisors: John Reilly, Boyd Swinburn, Dianne Ward. Harokopio University (Greece): Yannis Manios, Odysseas Androutsos, Eva Grammatikaki, Christina Katsarou, Eftychia Apostolidou, Eirini Efstathopoulou. LMU-Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (Germany): Berthold Koletzko, Kristin Duvinage, Sabine Ibrügger, Angelika Strauß, Birgit Herbert, Julia Birnbaum, Annette Payr, Christine Geyer. Ghent University (Belgium): Department of Movement and Sports Sciences: Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, Greet Cardon, Marieke De Craemer, Ellen De Decker. Department of Public Health: Lieven Annemans, Stefaan De Henauw, Lea Maes, Carine Vereecken, Jo Van Assche, Lore Pil. VU University Medical Center EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research (The Netherlands): EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research: Mai Chin A Paw, Saskia te Velde. University of Zaragoza (Spain): Luis Moreno, Theodora Mouratidou, Juan Fernandez, Maribel Mesana, Pilar De Miguel-Etayo, Esther M. González-Gil, Luis Gracia-Marco, Beatriz Oves. Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences (Norway): Agneta Yngve, Susanna Kugelberg, Christel Lynch, Annhild Mosdøl, Bente Nilsen. University of Durham (UK): Carolyn Summerbell, Helen Moore, Wayne Douthwaite, Catherine Nixon. State Institute of Early Childhood Research (Germany): Susanne Kreichauf, Andreas Wildgruber. Children’s Memorial Health Institute (Poland): Piotr Socha, Zbigniew Kulaga, Kamila Zych, Magdalena Góźdź, Beata Gurzkowska, Katarzyna Szott. Medical University of Varna (Bulgaria): Violeta Iotova, Mina Lateva, Natalya Usheva, Sonya Galcheva, Vanya Marinova, Zhaneta Radkova, Nevyana Feschieva. World Obesity Federation (UK): Tim Lobstein. CBO B.V. (The Netherlands): Goof Buijs, Annemiek Dorgelo, Aviva Nethe, Jan Jansen. AOK-Verlag (Germany): Otto Gmeiner, Jutta Retterath, Julia Wildeis, Axel Günthersberger. Roehampton University (UK): Leigh Gibson. University of Luxembourg (Luxembourg): Claus Voegele.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. 1.
    Bappert S, Karger C, Seidel I et al (2006) Sportmotorische tests im setting Verein—Der Kinderturn-test. Bewegungtherapie Gesundh 22:233–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barnett LM, Lai SK, Veldman SLC et al (2016) Correlates of gross motor competence in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 46:1663–1688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bös K (2001) Handbuch motorische tests. Hogrefe 2, GöttingenGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bös K (2006) Leitfaden Kinderturn-test. Sonderheft der deutschen turnerjugend (manual Kinderturn-test). Deutsche Turnerjugend im Deutschen Turner-Bund e.V., BarmerGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bös K, Woll A, Bappert S (2003) Motorische Leistungsunterschiede bei über- und normalgewichtigen Kindern im Vorschulalter. Haltung Bewegung 23:35–37Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Vet E, De Ridder DT, De Wit JB (2011) Environmental correlates of physical activity and dietary behaviours among young people: a systematic review of reviews. Obes Rev 12:e130–e142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Delaš S, Miletić A, Miletić Đ (2008) The influence of motor factors on performing fundamental movement skills: the differences between boys and girls. Facta universitatis-series. Phys Educ Sport 6:31–39Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ditton H, Maaz K (2011) Sozioökonomischer status und soziale ungleichheit. In: Reinders H, Ditton H, Gräsel C, Gniewosz B (eds) Empirische bildungsforschung: gegenstandsbereiche. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 193–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ebenegger V, Marques-Vidal P, Kriemler S et al (2012) Differences in aerobic fitness and lifestyle characteristics in preschoolers according to their weight status and sports club participation. Obes Facts 5:23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Evans GW, Kantrowitz E (2002) Socioeconomic status and health: the potential role of environmental risk exposure. Annu Rev Public Health 23:303–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Graf C, Koch B, Kretschmann-Kandel E et al (2004) Correlation between BMI, leisure habits and motor abilities in childhood (CHILT-project). Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 28:22–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Greier K, Riechelmann H (2014) Effects of migration background on weight status and motor performance of preschool children. Wien Klin Wochenschr 126:95–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Greier K, Riechelmann H, Burtscher M (2014) Prevalence of obesity and motor performance capabilities in Tyrolean preschool children. Wien Klin Wochenschr 126:409–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haibach PS, Reid G, Collier DH (2011) Motor learning and development. Human Kinetics, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hardy LL, O’hara BJ, Rogers K et al (2014) Contribution of organized and nonorganized activity to children’s motor skills and fitness. J School Health 84:690–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hardy LL, Reinten-Reynolds T, Espinel P et al (2012) Prevalence and correlates of low fundamental movement skill competency in children. Pediatrics 130:e390–e398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Haubenstricker J, Seefeldt V (1986) Acquisition of motor skills during childhood. Phys Act Wellbeing 1986:41–102Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Haywood K, Getchell N (2014) Life span motor development. Human Kinetics, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Herkowitz J (1978) Sex-role expectations and the motor behavior of young children. In: Ridenour MV (ed) Motor development: issues and applications. Princeton Book Company, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hinkley T, Crawford D, Salmon J et al (2008) Preschool children and physical activity: a review of correlates. Am J Prevent Med 34:435–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Iivonen S, Sääkslahti AK (2014) Preschool children’s fundamental motor skills: a review of significant determinants. Early Child Dev Care 184:1107–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jekauc D, Wagner MO, Herrmann C et al (2017) Does physical self-concept mediate the relationship between motor abilities and physical activity in adolescents and young adults? PLoS ONE 12:e0168539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Krombholz H (2006) Physical performance in relation to age, sex, birth order, social class, and sports activities of preschool children. Percept Motor Skills 102:477–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Krombholz H (1997) Physical performance in relation to age, sex, social class and sports activities in kindergarten and elementary school. Percept Motor Skills 84:1168–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lämmle L, Tittlbach S, Oberger J et al. A two-level model of motor performance ability. J Exerc Sci Fit 8:41–49Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lammle L, Worth A, Bos K (2012) Socio-demographic correlates of physical activity and physical fitness in German children and adolescents. Eur J Public Health 22:880–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Malina RM (2004) Motor development during infancy and early childhood: overview and suggested directions for research. Int J Sport Health Sci 2:50–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Manios Y, Androutsos O, Katsarou C et al (2014) Designing and implementing a kindergarten-based, family-involved intervention to prevent obesity in early childhood: the ToyBox-study. Obes Rev 3:5–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mckenzie TL, Sallis JF, Broyles SL et al (2002) Childhood movement skills: predictors of physical activity in Anglo American and Mexican American adolescents? Res Q Exerc Sport 73:238–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Morrow JR Jr, Tucker JS, Jackson AW et al (2013) Meeting physical activity guidelines and health-related fitness in youth. Am J Prevent Med 44:439–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mouratidou T, Miguel ML, Androutsos O et al (2014) Tools, harmonization and standardization procedures of the impact and outcome evaluation indices obtained during a kindergarten-based, family-involved intervention to prevent obesity in early childhood: the ToyBox-study. Obes Rev 15 (Suppl 3):53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Okely AD, Booth ML (2004) Mastery of fundamental movement skills among children in New South Wales: prevalence and sociodemographic distribution. J Sci Med Sport/Sports Med Aust 7:358–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pate RR, Pfeiffer KA, Trost SG et al (2004) Physical activity among children attending preschools. Pediatrics 114:1258–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Siahkouhian M, Mahmoodi H, Salehi M (2011) Relationship between fundamental movement skills and body mass index in 7-to-8 year-old children. World Appl Sci J 15:1354–1360Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tambalis KD, Panagiotakos DB, Arnaoutis G et al (2013) Endurance, explosive power, and muscle strength in relation to body mass index and physical fitness in greek children aged 7–10 years. Pediatr Exerc Sci 25:394–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Thomas JR, French KE (1985) Gender differences across age in motor performance a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 98:260–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vandendriessche JB, Vandorpe BF, Vaeyens R et al (2012) Variation in sport participation, fitness and motor coordination with socioeconomic status among Flemish children. Pediatr Exerc Sci 24:113–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Venetsanou F, Kambas A (2010) Environmental factors affecting preschoolers’ motor development. Early Child Educ J 37:319–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wankel LM, Berger BG (1990) The psychological and social benefits of sport and physical activity. J Leisure Res 22:167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Williams HG, Pfeiffer KA, O’neill JR et al (2008) Motor skill performance and physical activity in preschool children. Obesity 16:1421–1426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zahner L, Muehlbauer T, Schmid M et al (2009) Association of sports club participation with fitness and fatness in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41:344–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Živčić K, Trajkovski-Višić B, Sentderdi M (2008) Changes in some of the motor abilities of preschool children (age four). Facta Univ Ser Phys Educ Sport 6:41–50Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia S.r.l., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Metabolic and Nutritional Medicine, Dr. von Hauner Children’s HospitalLMU, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MunichMunichGermany
  2. 2.Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Sciences and EducationHarokopio UniversityAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations