Skip to main content

Affective response to acute resistance exercise: a comparison among machines and free weights

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed at investigating enjoyment, affective states (affective valence and perceived activation), and perceived exertion during acute resistance exercise with machines or free weights.

Methods

Thirty recreationally strength-trained males performed two training sessions on 2 separate days using a descending pyramid training system, one performed with three machines (chest press, shoulder press machine and leg press) and the other with three free weight exercises (bench press, front military press and squat). The Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale, the Borg Scale for Rating of Perceived Exertion, the Feeling Scale, and the Felt Arousal Scale were administered at the end of each session.

Results

Analyses revealed higher scores on all the variables when participants exercised with free weights (p < 0.001). Enjoyment was positively related to perceived exertion only in the free weight session (r = 0.45; p < 0.01). When looking at the circumplex model of affect, results showed that resistance exercise performed with free weights resulted in a pleasant activation feeling for all participants, while the machine training condition determined high-activation pleasant state for the majority but also cases of low-activation, displeasure state.

Conclusions

Resistance training with free weights resulted in increased pleasantness and activation compared with machine training. The establishment of resistance training programmes should consider, close to physiological and technical aspects, also the affective response to different modalities of exercise, particularly when the aim is improving the general fitness.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Abbreviations

RT:

Resistance training

RE:

Resistance exercise

References

  1. Kwan BM, Bryan AD (2010) Affective response to exercise as a component of exercise motivation: attitudes, norms, self-efficacy, and temporal stability of intentions. Psychol Sport Exerc 11(1):71–79

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Allender S, Cowburn G, Foster C (2006) Understanding participation in sport and physical activity among children and adults: a review of qualitative studies. Health Educ Res 21:826–835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hagberg LA, Lindahl B, Nyberg L, Hellénius ML (2009) Importance of enjoyment when promoting physical exercise. Scand J Med Sci Sports 19:740–747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR et al (2011) American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 43:1334–1359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thompson WR (2011) Worldwide survey of fitness trends for 2012. ACSMs Health Fit J 15(6):9–18

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ekkekakis P, Parfitt G, Petruzzello SJ (2011) The pleasure and displeasure people feel when they exercise at different intensities: decennial update and progress towards a tripartite rationale for exercise intensity prescription. Sports Med 41:641–671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Doyne EJ, Ossip-Klein DJ, Bowman ED, Osborn KM, McDougall-Wilson IB, Neimeyer RA (1987) Running versus weight lifting in the treatment of depression. J Consult Clin Psychol 55:748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bartholomew JB, Linder DE (1998) State anxiety following resistance exercise: the role of gender and exercise intensity. J Behav Med 21:205–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Focht BC, Koltyn KF (1999) Influence of resistance exercise of different intensities on state anxiety and blood pressure. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31(3):456–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Connor PJ, Bryant CX, Veltri JP, Gebhardt SM (1993) State anxiety and ambulatory blood pressure following resistance exercise in females. Med Sci Sports Exerc 25:516–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bartholomew JB, Moore J, Todd J, Todd T, Elrod CC (2001) Psychological states following resistance exercise of different workloads. J Appl Sport Psychol 13:399–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Arent SM, Landers DM, Matt KS, Etnier JL (2005) Dose–response and mechanistic issues in the resistance training and affect relationship. J Sport Exerc Psychol 27:92–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bibeau WS, Moore JB, Mitchell NG, Vargas-Tonsing T, Bartholomew J (2010) Effects of acute resistance training of different intensities and rest periods on anxiety and affect. J Strength Cond Res 24:2184–2191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. SantaBarbara NJ, Whitworth JW, Ciccolo JT (2017) A systematic review of the effects of resistance training on body image. J Strength Cond Res 31(10):2880–2888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chang YK, Etnier JL (2009) Exploring the dose–response relationship between resistance exercise intensity and cognitive function. J Sport Exerc Psychol 31:640–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bartholomew JB (1999) The effect of resistance exercise on manipulated preexercise mood states for male exercisers. J Sport Exerc Psychol 21:39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Belezza PA, Hall EE, Miller PC, Bixby WR (2009) The influence of exercise order on blood lactate, perceptual, and affective responses. J Strength Cond Res 23(1):203–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Focht BC, Garver MJ, Cotter JA, Devor ST, Lucas AR, Fairman CM (2015) Affective responses to acute resistance exercise performed at self-selected and imposed loads in trained women. J Strength Cond Res 29(11):3067–3074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Russel JA (1980) A circumplex model of affect. J Pers Soc Psychol 39:1161–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Buscombe RM, Inskip H (2013) Affective change as a function of exercise intensity in a group aerobics class. J Exerc Sci Fit 11:42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hall E, Chmelo E, DeWitt R, Kostura C, Morrison J, Miller P (2005) Do you feel the pump? Examination of affective responses to different modes of resistance training in college females. In: Morris T (ed) Proceedings of the 11th World Congress of Sport Psychology. International Society of Sport Psychology, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  22. Miller PC, Hall EE, Chmelo EA, Morrison JM, DeWitt RE, Kostura CM (2009) The influence of muscle action on heart rate, RPE, and affective responses after upper-body resistance exercise. J Strength Cond Res 23(2):366–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hall EE, Ekkekakis P, Petruzzello SJ (2002) The affective beneficence of vigorous exercise revisited. Br J Health Psychol 7(1):47–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Motl RW, Dishman RK, Saunders R, Dowda M, Felton G, Pate RR (2001) Measuring enjoyment of physical activity in adolescent girls. Am J Prev Med 21(2):110–117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Carraro A, Young MC, Robazza C (2008) A contribution to the validation of the physical activity enjoyment scale in an Italian sample. Soc Behav Pers 36:911–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Carraro A, Gobbi E, Ferri I, Benvenuti P, Zanuso S (2014) Enjoyment perception during exercise with aerobic machines. Percept Mot Skills 119(1):146–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Borg G (1998) Borg’s Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales. Human Kinetics, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  28. American College of Sport Medicine (2010) ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, 8th edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hardy CJ, Rejeski WJ (1989) Not what, but how one feels: the measurement of affect during exercise. J Sport Exerc Psychol 11:304–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ekkekakis P (2009) Let them roam free? Sports Med 39:857–888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Svebak S, Murgatroyd S (1985) Metamotivational dominance: a multimethod validation of reversal theory constructs. J Pers Soc Psychol 48(1):107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hunter GR, Seelhorst D, Snyder S (2003) Comparison of metabolic and heart rate responses to super slow vs. traditional resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 17(1):76–81

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Paoli A, Moro T, Marcolin G, Neri M, Bianco A, Palma A, Grimaldi K (2012) High-Intensity Interval Resistance Training (HIRT) influences resting energy expenditure and respiratory ratio in non-dieting individuals. J Transl Med 10(1):237–245

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. American College of Sports Medicine (2009) American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41(3):687–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Greene DR, Petruzzello SJ (2015) More isn’t necessarily better: examining the intensity-affect-enjoyment relationship in the context of resistance exercise. Sport Exerc Perform Psychol 4(2):75–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ekkekakis P, Hall EE, Petruzzello SJ (2004) Practical markers of the transition from aerobic to anaerobic metabolism during exercise: rationale and a case for affect-based exercise prescription. Prev Med 38(2):149–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ekkekakis P, Hall EE, Petruzzello SJ (2008) The relationship between exercise intensity and affective responses demystified: to crack the 40-year-old nut, replace the 40-year-old nutcracker. Ann Behav Med 35:136–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Attilio Carraro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest relating to the publication of this manuscript.

Ethical statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Padua research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carraro, A., Paoli, A. & Gobbi, E. Affective response to acute resistance exercise: a comparison among machines and free weights. Sport Sci Health 14, 283–288 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-018-0427-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-018-0427-4

Keywords

  • Affective response
  • Enjoyment
  • Perceived activation
  • Resistance exercise