Relationship between physical fitness and match-derived performance in judo athletes according to weight category
- 49 Downloads
This study aimed to verify the relationship between physical tests and match-derived performance in official judo matches, considering the weight category.
Forty-one judo athletes participated in the study (19 women and 22 men), were divided into two groups according to weight category (lightweight and heavyweight) and were evaluated in two time points—(1) physical tests: countermovement jump (CMJ), handgrip strength (HGS), special judo fitness test (SJFT) and judogi grip strength test dynamic (JGSTDIN) and isometric (JGSTISO), and (2) match-derived performance during official matches. The t test and Pearson’s or Spearman’s coefficients were used with a significance level set at 5%.
Heavyweight athletes (male and female) showed better performances in power output in the CMJ (CMJPPO), HGS, and number of throws in SJFT (female only) compared with lightweights, while lightweights (male and female) performed better in the JGSTDIN and JGSTISO, respectively (p < 0.05). Additionally, a positive correlation was found between effective combat time (ECT) and CMJPPO for male lightweight athletes (r = 0.65). In the female lightweight group, the ECT was correlated with CMJ height (r = 0.75) and HGS (r = 0.65); the number of attacks was correlated with HGS (r = 0.64) and CMJPPO (r = 0.75). Considering the heavyweight female group, we verified a significant correlation between JGSTISO and efficiency (r = 0.67), as well as between effectiveness and HGS (r = 0.68).
Time motion performance in lightweight athletes depends more on HGS and muscle power of the lower limbs, whereas effectiveness and efficiency depend on HGS and resistance strength of the upper limbs in heavyweight athletes.
KeywordsCombat sports Muscle power Strength Body mass Anaerobic capacity Effectiveness
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest relating to the publication of this manuscript.
All procedures were approved by institutional ethic review of the Federal University of Santa Catarina, Santa Catarina, Brazil
All subjects provided written informed consent.
- 1.Franchini E, Artioli GG, Brito CJ (2013) Judo combat: time motion analysis and physiology. Int J Perform Anal Sport 13(3):624–641Google Scholar
- 2.Miarka B, Panissa V, Julio UF, Del Vecchio FB, Calmet M, Franchini E (2012) A comparison of time-motion performance between age groups in judo matches. J Sports Sci 30:899–905Google Scholar
- 4.Franchini E, Miarka B, Matheus L, Del Vecchio F (2011) Endurance in judogi grip strength tests: comparison between elite and non-elite judo players. Arch Budo 7:1–4Google Scholar
- 5.Bonato M, Rampichini S, Ferrara M, Benedini S, Sbriccoli P, Merati G, Franchini E, La Torre A (2015) Aerobic training program for the enhancements of HR and VO2 off-kinetics in elite judo athletes. J Sports Med Phys Fit 55(11):1277–1284Google Scholar
- 7.Sterkowicz S, Zuchowicz A, Kubica R (1999) Levels of anaerobic and aerobic capacity indices and results for the special judo fitness test in judo competitors. J Hum Kinet 2:115–135Google Scholar
- 9.Kons RL, Ache-Dias J, Detanico D (2017) Can physical tests predict the technical-tactical performance during official judo competitions? Arch Budo Sci Martial Art Extreme Sports 13:143–151Google Scholar
- 10.International Judo Federation (2018) Sports and organization rules of the international judo federation. http://99e89a50309ad79ff91d-082b8fd5551e97bc65e327988b444396.r14.cf3.rackcdn.com/up/2018/10/IJF_Sport_and_Organisation_Rul-1539980456.pdf. Accessed 27 Aug 2018
- 13.Franchini E, Nunes AV, Moraes JM, Del Vecchio FB (2007) Physical fitness and anthropometrical profile of the Brazilian male judo team. J Physiol Anthropol 26(2):59–67Google Scholar
- 14.Callister R, Callister RJ, Staron RS, Fleck SJ, Tesch P, Dudley GA (1991) Physiological characteristics of elite judo athletes. Int J Sports Med 12(2):196–203Google Scholar
- 15.Franchini E, Sterkowicz S (2003) Tactics and techniques in high level judo competition (1995–2001): considerations about weight category and gender (in Portuguese). Rev Mack Edu Fís Esp 2(2):125–138Google Scholar
- 16.Sterkowicz S, Franchini E (2000) Techniques used by judoists during the World and Olympic tournaments 1995–1999. Hum Mov 2(1):24–33Google Scholar
- 18.Petroski EL, Pires Neto C (1996) Validation of anthropometric equations for the estimation of body density in men. Braz J Phys Act Health 1:5–14Google Scholar
- 20.Siri WE (1961) Body composition from fluid spaces and density: analysis of methods. In: Brozek J, Henschel A (eds) Techniques for measuring body composition. National Academy of Science and Natural Resource Council, Washington, pp 223–244Google Scholar
- 22.Adam M, Smaruj M, Tyszkowski S (2011) The diagnosis of the technical-tactical preparation of judo competitors during the World Championships (2009 and 2010) in the light of the new judo sport rules. Arch Budo 7:5–9Google Scholar
- 23.Sterkowicz S, Maślej P (1999) An evaluation of the technical and tactical aspects of judo matches at the seniors level. Sport Wyczyn 10:45–53Google Scholar
- 24.Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Hillsdale, ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
- 25.Hopkins WG (2004) How to interpret changes in an athletic performance test? Sportscience 8:1–7Google Scholar
- 27.Franchini E, Takito MY, Bertuzzi RCM (2005) Morphological, physiological and technical variables in high-level college judoists. Arch Budo 1:1–7Google Scholar
- 28.Casals C, Huertas JR, Franchini E, Sterkowicz-Przybycień K, Sterkowicz S, Gutiérrez-García C, Escobar-Molina R (2017) Special judo fitness test level and anthropometric profile of elite Spanish judo athletes. J Strength Cond Res 31(5):1229–1235. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001261 Google Scholar
- 29.Zaggelidis G, Lazaridis SN, Malkogiorgos A, Mavrovouniotis F (2012) Differences in vertical jumping performance between untrained males and advanced Greek judokas. Arch Budo 8:87–90Google Scholar