Advertisement

Sport Sciences for Health

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 121–130 | Cite as

Oxygen consumption and muscle fatigue induced by whole-body electromyostimulation compared to equal-duration body weight circuit training

  • Gennaro BocciaEmail author
  • Alessandro Fornasiero
  • Aldo Savoldelli
  • Lorenzo Bortolan
  • Alberto Rainoldi
  • Federico Schena
  • Barbara Pellegrini
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) has become increasingly popular under the promise to offer a time-saving and effective exercise protocols. Few studies estimating the training intervention intensity of WB-EMS are available in the literature.

Aim

The aim of this study was first to estimate the metabolic demand and muscle fatigue induced by a training session with WB-EMS, and second to compare them to a control intervention.

Methods

Ten young participants performed two training sessions: an experimental condition constituted by five exercises with superimposed WB-EMS and a control condition constituted by five body weight exercises. Both sessions lasted 15 min and were based on isometric intermittent contraction (6 of contraction interspersed by 4 s of rest). Muscle fatigue was assessed by determining the force decrease in the following tests: isometric mid-thigh pull; plyometric push-up; counter-movement jump. Oxygen consumption and energy expenditure were recorded by measuring respiratory gases exchange to quantify the metabolic demand of the exercises.

Results

The WB-EMS intervention required greater volume of oxygen consumed (WB-EMS 1584 ± 251 ml/min; control 1465 ± 216 ml/min, p = 0.006) and energy expenditure (WB-EMS 470 ± 71 kcal/h; control 438 ± 61 kcal/h, p = 0.013) than in control intervention. Overall, the WB-EMS training induced muscle fatigue (all PRE vs POST tests p ≤ 0.02) whereas the body weight exercises did not (all p > 0.14).

Conclusions

These results indicate that WB-EMS intervention constituted a vigorous physical activity. The WB-EMS required also a greater metabolic demand and greater muscle fatigue than a traditional body weight circuit training. Thus, WB-EMS can be considered as an alternative training tool for physically active individuals.

Keywords

Muscle fatigue Oxygen consumption Energy expenditure Plyometric push-up Isometric mid-thigh pull Counter-movement jump 

Abbreviations

ANOVA

Analysis of variance

CMJ

Counter-movement jump

IMTP

Isometric mid-thigh pull

MET

Metabolic equivalent

WB-EMS

Whole-body electromyostimulation

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Mara D’Alessandro, Damiano Fruet, Federica Gilli, Roberto Modena, and Andrea Zignoli for their valuable help in data collection.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the local ethical committee (Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona) and performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.

Informed consent

All participants provided their written informed consent before participation in the experiments.

References

  1. 1.
    Kemmler W, Von Stengel S, Schwarz J, Mayhew JL (2012) Effect of whole-body electromyostimulation on energy expenditure during exercise. J Strength Cond Res 26(1):240–245. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31821a3a11 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kemmler W, von Stengel S, Kohl M (2016) Exercise frequency and bone mineral density development in exercising postmenopausal osteopenic women. Is there a critical dose of exercise for affecting bone? Results of the Erlangen Fitness and Osteoporosis Prevention Study. Bone 89:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.04.019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kemmler W, Teschler M, Weissenfels A, Bebenek M, von Stengel S, Kohl M, Freiberger E, Goisser S, Jakob F, Sieber C, Engelke K (2016) Whole-body electromyostimulation to fight sarcopenic obesity in community-dwelling older women at risk. Results of the randomized controlled FORMOsA-sarcopenic obesity study. Osteoporos Int. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3662-z Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kemmler W, Teschler M, Weissenfels A, Bebenek M, Frohlich M, Kohl M, von Stengel S (2016) Effects of whole-body electromyostimulation versus high-intensity resistance exercise on body composition and strength: a randomized controlled study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2016:9236809. doi: 10.1155/2016/9236809 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kemmler W, Schliffka R, Mayhew JL, von Stengel S (2010) Effects of whole-body electromyostimulation on resting metabolic rate, body composition, and maximum strength in postmenopausal women: the Training and Electro Stimulation Trial. J Strength Cond Res 24(7):1880–1887. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181ddaeee CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maffiuletti NA, Minetto MA, Farina D, Bottinelli R (2011) Electrical stimulation for neuromuscular testing and training: state-of-the art and unresolved issues. Eur J Appl Physiol 111(10):2391–2397. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2133-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Malnick SD, Band Y, Alin P, Maffiuletti NA (2016) It’s time to regulate the use of whole body electrical stimulation. BMJ 352:i1693. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1693 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gregory CM, Bickel CS (2005) Recruitment patterns in human skeletal muscle during electrical stimulation. Phys Ther 85(4):358–364PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hamada T, Hayashi T, Kimura T, Nakao K, Moritani T (2004) Electrical stimulation of human lower extremities enhances energy consumption, carbohydrate oxidation, and whole body glucose uptake. J Appl Physiol (1985) 96(3):911–916. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00664.2003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gaffurini P, Neviani C, Orizio C, Gobbo M (2012) Oxygen supply/uptake mismatch during incremental stimulation of the human tibialis anterior. Sport Sci Health 7:65–70. doi: 10.1007/s11332-012-0114-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vanderthommen M, Duteil S, Wary C, Raynaud JS, Leroy-Willig A, Crielaard JM, Carlier PG (2003) A comparison of voluntary and electrically induced contractions by interleaved 1H- and 31P-NMRS in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985) 94(3):1012–1024. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00887.2001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wirtz N, Wahl P, Kleinoder H, Wechsler K, Achtzehn S, Mester J (2015) Acute metabolic, hormonal, and psychological responses to strength training with superimposed EMS at the beginning and the end of a 6 week training period. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 15(4):325–332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Raastad T, Hallen J (2000) Recovery of skeletal muscle contractility after high- and moderate-intensity strength exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 82(3):206–214. doi: 10.1007/s004210050673 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Izquierdo M, Ibanez J, Calbet JA, Gonzalez-Izal M, Navarro-Amezqueta I, Granados C, Malanda A, Idoate F, Gonzalez-Badillo JJ, Hakkinen K, Kraemer WJ, Tirapu I, Gorostiaga EM (2009) Neuromuscular fatigue after resistance training. Int J Sports Med 30(8):614–623. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1214379 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gandevia SC (2001) Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue. Physiol Rev 81(4):1725–1789PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Enoka RM, Duchateau J (2008) Muscle fatigue: what, why and how it influences muscle function. J Physiol 586(1):11–23. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.139477 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tanner R, Gore C (2013) Physiological tests for elite athletes. Human Kinetics, pp 207–226Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Beckham G, Mizuguchi S, Carter C, Sato K, Ramsey M, Lamont H, Hornsby G, Haff G, Stone M (2013) Relationships of isometric mid-thigh pull variables to weightlifting performance. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 53(5):573–581PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Leon AS, Jacobs DR Jr, Montoye HJ, Sallis JF, Paffenbarger RS Jr (1993) Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 25(1):71–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Borg GA (1982) Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14(5):377–381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fanchini M, Ghielmetti R, Coutts AJ, Schena F, Impellizzeri FM (2015) Effect of training-session intensity distribution on session rating of perceived exertion in soccer players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 10(4):426–430. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2014-0244 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    von Stengel S, Bebenek M, Engelke K, Kemmler W (2015) Whole-body electromyostimulation to fight osteopenia in elderly females: the randomized controlled training and electrostimulation trial (TEST-III). J Osteoporos 2015:643520. doi: 10.1155/2015/643520 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin BA, Macera CA, Heath GW, Thompson PD, Bauman A (2007) Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39(8):1423–1434. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180616b27 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zanuso S, Bergamin M, Jimenez A, Pugliese G, D’Errico V, Nicolucci A, Ermolao A, Balducci S (2016) Determination of metabolic equivalents during low- and high-intensity resistance exercise in healthy young subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes. Biol Sport 33(1):77–82. doi: 10.5604/20831862.1194124 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rooney KJ, Herbert RD, Balnave RJ (1994) Fatigue contributes to the strength training stimulus. Med Sci Sports Exerc 26(9):1160–1164PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Drinkwater EJ, Lawton TW, Lindsell RP, Pyne DB, Hunt PH, McKenna MJ (2005) Training leading to repetition failure enhances bench press strength gains in elite junior athletes. J Strength Cond Res 19(2):382–388. doi: 10.1519/R-15224.1 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Filipovic A, Kleinoder H, Dormann U, Mester J (2011) Electromyostimulation–a systematic review of the influence of training regimens and stimulation parameters on effectiveness in electromyostimulation training of selected strength parameters. J Strength Cond Res 25(11):3218–3238. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318212e3ce CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Paillard T (2008) Combined application of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and voluntary muscular contractions. Sports Med 38(2):161–177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ratkevicius A, Skurvydas A, Povilonis E, Quistorff B, Lexell J (1998) Effects of contraction duration on low-frequency fatigue in voluntary and electrically induced exercise of quadriceps muscle in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 77(5):462–468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Elia M, Livesey G (1992) Energy expenditure and fuel selection in biological systems: the theory and practice of calculations based on indirect calorimetry and tracer methods. World Rev Nutr Diet Basel 70:68–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Scott CB, Croteau A, Ravlo T (2009) Energy expenditure before, during, and after the bench press. J Strength Cond Res 23(2):611–618. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31818c2845 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    LaForgia J, Withers RT, Gore CJ (2006) Effects of exercise intensity and duration on the excess post-exercise oxygen consumption. J Sports Sci 24(12):1247–1264. doi: 10.1080/02640410600552064 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    di Prampero PE, Ferretti G (1999) The energetics of anaerobic muscle metabolism: a reappraisal of older and recent concepts. Respir Physiol 118(2–3):103–115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kastner A, Braun M, Meyer T (2015) Two cases of rhabdomyolysis after training with electromyostimulation by 2 young male professional soccer players. Clin J Sport Med 25(6):e71–e73. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000153 PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CeRiSM Research Center “Sport, Mountain, and Health”RoveretoItaly
  2. 2.Department of Medical Sciences, Motor Science Research Center, School of Exercise and Sport Sciences, SUISMUniversity of TurinTurinItaly
  3. 3.Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, School of Sport and Exercise SciencesUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly

Personalised recommendations