Advertisement

Sport Sciences for Health

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 1–9 | Cite as

Mediator and moderator variables of imagery use-motor learning and sport performance relationships: a narrative review

  • Maamer SlimaniEmail author
  • Karim Chamari
  • Driss Boudhiba
  • Foued Chéour
Review

Abstract

The aim of the present review paper was to identify the potential mediator and moderator variables involved in the recommendation of which types (functions) of imagery are the greatest use to the performer. The current review has proven that the efficacy in using imagery as a mediator of the relationship between imagery ability and cognitive imagery use. Particularly, it has been consistently found that athletes who use motivational general-mastery (MG-M) imagery report higher levels of both self-confidence and self-efficacy. As moderator variables, the reviewed studies have revealed that the stage of skill learning has a differential effect on the type of imagery used by athletes. Firstly, in the early stages of skill acquisition, novices may use imagery primarily for its cognitive specific (CS) function to assist in the organization of information (about the skill or strategy to be learnt). Secondly, in the autonomous stage of learning, athletes reported their use of imagery for MG-M function. Typically, MG-M imagery is mostly used in competition and CS imagery is mostly in practice, with motivational specific (MS) and motivational general-arousal (MG-A) imagery the least used in both these settings. However, the present review also showed that athletes at higher competitive levels used all five functions of imagery to a greater extent in both training and competition than do athletes at lower levels. In addition, this review indicated that athletes in closed-skill sports use more cognitive imagery functions [CS and cognitive general (CG)] than athletes in open-skill sports. While, athletes in open-skilled sports used significantly more MG-A imagery than those in closed-skill sports. It has also been shown that CG imagery is used more in such team sports (i.e., soccer) to build or maintain confidence and self-efficacy, and the CS imagery is used to improve sport performance (i.e., passing, dribbling). In conclusion, the data obtained in the present review have shown that self-efficacy as factors that may facilitate the effectiveness of imagery use by athletes. Thus, athletes report using imagery for all five functions (CG, CS, MG-A, MG-M, and MS imagery), MG-M and CS imagery are typically the most frequently employed. Whereas, MG-M and CG functions used to build or maintain confidence and self-efficacy, and CS function used to improve skill learning and sport performance. From an applied perspective, sport psychologists and fitness trainers can be implemented mental imagery training according to their athlete levels, types of skills, the intended outcome for the imagery use, phase of learning, and sport situations.

Keywords

Imagery Learning Performance Sports Mediator Moderator 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this review.

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Callow N, Waters A (2005) The effect of kinesthetic imagery on the sport confidence of flat-race horse jockeys. Psychol Sport Exerc 6:443–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moran A (2004) Sport and exercise psychology: a critical introduction. Routledge, HoveCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cumming J, Williams SE (2012) The role of imagery in performance. In: Murphy S (ed) Handbook of sport and performance psychology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 213–232Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cumming J, Williams SE (2014) Imagery. In: Eklund RC, Tenenbuam G (eds) Encyclopedia of sport and exercise psychology. Sage, Los Angeles, pp 369–373Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martin KA, Moritz SE, Hall C (1999) Imagery use in sport: a literature review and applied model. Sport Psychol 13:245–268Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cumming J, Ramsey R (2009) Sport imagery interventions. In: Mellalieu S, Hanton S (eds) Advances in applied sport psychology: a review. Routledge, London, pp 5–36Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Murphy S, Nordin SM, Cumming J (2008) Imagery in sport, exercise and dance. In: Horn T (ed) Advances in sport and exercise psychology. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 297–324Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Driskell JE, Copper C, Moran A (1994) Does mental practice enhance performance? J Appl Psychol 79:481–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hinshaw KE (1991) The effect of mental practice on motor skill performance: critical evaluation and meta-analysis. Imagin Cogn Pers 11:3–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paivio A (1985) Cognitive and motivational functions of imagery in human performance. Can J Appl Sport Sci 10:22s–28sPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guillot A, Collet C (2008) Construction of the motor imagery integrative model in sport: a review and theoretical investigations of motor imagery use. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol 1(1):31–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Munroe KJ, Giacobbi P, Hall CR, Weinberg RS (2000) The four Ws of imagery use: where, when, why, and what. Sport Psychol 14:119–137Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hall CR, Mack DE, Paivio A, Hausenblaus HA (1998) Imagery use by athletes: development of the sport imagery questionnaire. Int J Sport Psychol 23:1–17Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Callow N, Hardy L (2001) Types of imagery associated with sport confidence in netball players of varying skill levels. J Appl Sport Psychol 13:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nordin SM, Cumming J (2008) Types and functions of athletes’ imagery: testing predictions from the applied model of imagery use by examining effectiveness. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol 6:189–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Short SE, Monsma EV, Short M (2004) Is what you see really what you get? Athletes’ perceptions of imagery functions. Sport Psychol 18:341–349Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice-Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bandura A (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vealey RS (2010) Conceptualization of sport confidence and competitive orientation: preliminary investigation and instrument development. J Sport Psychol 8:221–246Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Callow N, Hardy L, Hall C (2001) The effects of a motivational general-mastery imagery intervention on the sport confidence of high-level badminton players. Res Q Exerc Sport 72:389–400CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moritz SE, Hall CR, Martin KA, Vadocz E (1996) What are confident athletes imagining? An examination of image content. Sport Psychol 10:171–179Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jones MV, Mace RD, Bray SR, MacRae AW, Stockbride C (2002) The impact of motivational imagery on the emotional state and self-efficacy levels of novice climbers. J Sport Behav 25:57–73Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Abma CL, Fry MD, Li Y, Relyea C (2002) Differences in imagery content and imagery ability between high and low confident track and field athletes. J Appl Sport Psychol 14:67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mills KD, Munroe KJ, Hall CR (2000) The relationship between imagery and self-efficacy in competitive athletics. Imagin Cogn Pers 20:33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Short SE, Short MW (2005) Differences between high and low-confident football players on imagery functions: a consideration of the athletes’ perceptions. J Appl Sport Psychol 17:197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Levy AR, Perry J, Nicholls AR, Larkin D, Davies J (2015) Sources of sport confidence, imagery type and performance among competitive athletes: the mediating role of sports confidence. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 55(7–8):835–844PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Feltz DL, Riessinger CA (1990) Effects on in vivo emotive imagery and performance feedback on self-efficacy and muscular endurance. J Sport Exerc Psychol 12:132–143Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Garza DL, Feltz DL (1998) Effects of selected mental practice techniques on performance ratings, self-efficacy, and competition confidence of competitive figure skaters. Sport Psychol 12:1–15Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    McKenzie AD, Howe B (1997) The effect of imagery on self-efficacy for a motor skill. Int J Sports Psychol 28:196–210Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Short SE, Bruggeman JM, Engel SG, Marback TL, Wang LJ, Willadsen A et al (2002) The effect of imagery function and imagery direction on self-efficacy and performance on a golf-putting task. Sport Psychol 16:48–67Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Beauchamp MR, Bray SR, Albinson JG (2002) Pre-competition imagery, self-efficacy and performance in collegiate golfers. J Sports Sci 20:697–705CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nordin SM, Cumming J (2005) More than meets the eye: investigating imagery type, direction, and outcome. Sport Psychol 19:1–17Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Weinberg RS, Gould D (2003) Foundations of sport and exercise psychology, 3rd edn. Human Kinetics, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Murphy SM, Jowdy DP (1992) Imagery and mental practice. In: Horn TS (ed) Advances in sport psychology. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 221–250Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hall CR, Munroe-Chandler KJ, Cumming J, Law B, Ramsey R, Murphy L (2009) Imagery and observational learning use and their relationship to sport confidence. J Sports Sci 27:327–337CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Salmon J, Hall C, Haslam I (1994) The use of imagery by soccer players. J Appl Sport Psychol 6(1):116–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Arvinen-Barrow M, Weigand DA, Thomas S et al (2007) Elite and novice athletes’ imagery use in open and closed sports. J Appl Sport Psychol 19:93–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Seif-Barghi T, Kordi R, Memari A-H, Mansournia M-A, Jalali-Ghomi M (2012) The effect of an ecological imagery program on soccer performance of elite players. Asian J Sports Med 3(2):81–89CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    White A, Hardy L (1998) An in-depth analysis of the uses of imagery by high-level slalom canoeists and artistic gymnasts. Sport Psychol 12:387–403Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cumming J, Hall CR (2002) Athletes’ use of imagery in the off-season. Sport Psychol 16:160–172Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Munroe-Chandler K, Hall C, Fishburne G, Murphy L, Hall ND (2012) Effects of a cognitive specific imagery intervention on the soccer skill performance of young athletes: age group comparisons. Psychol Sport Exerc 13(3):324–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Munroe-Chandler K, Hall C, Fishburne G (2008) Playing with confidence: the relationship between imagery use and self-confidence and self-efficacy in youth soccer players. J Sports Sci 26:1539–1546CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Carron AV, Chelladurai P (1981) Cohesiveness as a factor in sport performance. Int Rev Sport Sociol 12:49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fenker RM, Lambiotte JG (1987) A performance enhancement program for a college football team: one incredible season. Sport Psychol 1:224–236Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rushall BS (1988) Covert modeling as a procedure for altering an elite athlete’s psychological state. Sport Psychol 2:131–140Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    MacIntyre T, Moran A (1996) Imagery use among canoeists: a worldwide survey of novice, intermediate, and elite slalomists. J Appl Sport Psychol 8:S132Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Veraksa A, Gorovaya A (2012) Imagery training efficacy among novice soccer players. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 33:338–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Munroe K, Hall C, Simms S, Weinberg R (1998) The influence of type of sport and time of season on athletes’ use of imagery. Sport Psychol 12:440–449Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Vealey RS, Greenleaf CA (2001) Seeing is believing: understanding and using imagery in sport. In: Williams JM (ed) Applied sport psychology: personal growth to peak performance. Mayfield Publishing Company, Mountain View, pp 247–283Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Cumming J (2008) Investigating the relationship between exercise imagery, leisure time exercise behavior, and self-efficacy. J Appl Sport Psychol 20:184–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Goss H, Hall C, Buckolz E, Fishburne G (1986) Imagery ability and the acquisition and retention of movements. Mem Cognit 14:469–477CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Robin N, Dominique L, Toussaint L, Blandin Y, Guillot A, Le Her M (2007) Effect of motor imagery training on service return accuracy in tennis: the role of imagery ability. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol 2:175–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hall CR, Buckolz E, Fishburne G (1992) Imagery and the acquisition of motor skills. Can J Sport Sci 17:19–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rodgers WM, Hall CR, Buckholz E (1991) The effect of an imagery training program on imagery ability, imagery use and figure skating performance. J Appl Sport Psychol 3:109–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hall CR, Martin KA (1997) Measuring movement imagery abilities: a revision of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire. J Ment Imagery 21:143–154Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Monsma EV, Overby LY (2004) The relationship between imagery and competitive anxiety in ballet auditions. J Dance Med Sci 8:11–18Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Gregg M, Hall C (2006) Measurement of motivational imagery abilities in sport. J Sports Sci 24(9):961–971CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Hall C, Pongrac J (1983) Movement imagery questionnaire. University of Western Ontario, LondonGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hall CR (1998) Measuring imagery abilities and imagery use. In: Duda JL (ed) Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement. Fitness Information Technology, Morgantown, pp 165–172Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Williams SE, Cumming J (2011) Measuring athlete imagery ability: the sport imagery ability questionnaire. J Sport Exerc Psychol 33(3):416–440PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ruiz MC, Watt AP (2014) Psychometric characteristics of the Spanish version of the Sport Imagery Questionnaire. Psicothema 26(2):267–272PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Hall C (2001) Imagery in sport and exercise. In: Singer RN, Hausenblas H, Janelle CM (eds) Handbook of sport psychology. John Wiley and Son, New York, pp 529–549Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Jeannerod M (2001) Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage 14:103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Williams SE, Cumming J, Ntoumanis N, Nordin-Bates SM, Ramsey R, Hall CR (2012) Further validation and development of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire. J Sport Exerc Psychol 34:621–646PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Bauman AE, Sallis JF, Dzewaltowski DA et al (2002) Toward a better understanding of the influences on physical activity: the role of determinants, correlates, causal variables, mediators, moderators, and confounders. Am J Prev Med 23(2):5–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maamer Slimani
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Karim Chamari
    • 3
  • Driss Boudhiba
    • 4
  • Foued Chéour
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesFaculty of Sciences of BizerteBizerteTunisia
  2. 2.Research Laboratory “Sports performance Optimization”National Center of Medicine and Science in Sports (CNMSS)TunisTunisia
  3. 3.Athlete Health and Performance Research Centre, ASPETARQatar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine HospitalDohaQatar
  4. 4.High Institute of Sport and Physical Education, Ksar-SaïdMannouba UniversityMannoubaTunisia
  5. 5.High Institute of Applied Biology of MédenineMedenineTunisia

Personalised recommendations