Sport Sciences for Health

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 211–217 | Cite as

The effectiveness of an 8-week Zumba programme for weight reduction in a group of Maltese overweight and obese women

Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Zumba dance exercises are promoted for body weight reduction. However, scientific research on its potential as a weight loss tool is scant. Only a few energy expenditure studies on small samples of relatively young and apparently healthy volunteers were performed, and the energy cost of Zumba has not been translated into actual weight reduction. The study investigated the before–after effects of a Zumba programme on the weight and body mass index (BMI) of 36 females, mean age 34.25 ± 8.50 years and mean BMI 32.98 ± 5.32 kg/m2.

Methods

The intervention involved 16 hourly Zumba sessions held twice weekly over 8 weeks. The exercises comprised a mixture of merengue, salsa, reggaeton and bachata with warm-up and cool-down activities. They were of low-impact style, but were maintained at vigorous intensity that was still bearable for the obese subjects. An important requirement was that the programme had to be taken as an additional part of their lives and not as a means of altering their nutrition and physical activity habits.

Results

The subjects had statistically significant decreases and large effects for weight and BMI: 2.13 kg, t(35) = 13.77, P < 0.0005, d = 2.30, and 0.83 kg/m2, t(35) = 13.02, P < 0.0005, d = 2.17, respectively.

Conclusions

Good programme adherence and other strengths were attributed to this study. However, there could have been factors like history threats that affected the changes. Further studies are therefore required to establish the effectiveness of Zumba as an exercise modality for weight loss.

Keywords

Body mass index Body weight Obesity Overweight Weight loss Zumba 

Supplementary material

11332_2014_195_MOESM1_ESM.docx (120 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 120 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Hill RJ, Davies PSW (2001) The validity of self-reported energy intake as determined using the doubly labelled water technique. Br J Nutr 85:415–430. doi:10.1079/BJN2000281 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lopez D (2013) Healthy benefits of Zumba. Zumba Dance Web. http://zumbadancelv.blogspot.com/2013/03/healthy-benefits-of-zumba_3.html. Accessed 21 May 2014
  3. 3.
    Sugar J (2014) Tips for Zumba class newbies. Popsugar Web. http://www.fitsugar.com/Beginner-Zumba-Class-Tips-From-Instructor-18975667. Accessed 21 May 2014
  4. 4.
    Diu NL (2013) Why Britain is going crazy for Zumba. The Telegraph Web. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/9843930/Why-Britain-is-going-crazy-for-Zumba.html. Accessed 21 May 2014
  5. 5.
    Luettgen M, Foster C, Doberstein S, Mikat R, Porcari J (2012) Zumba®: is the “fitness-party” a good workout? J Sports Sci Med 11:357–358PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    American College of Sports Medicine (2009) ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, 8th edn. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Otto RM, Maniguet E, Peters A, Boutagy N, Gabbard A, Wygand JW, Yoke M (2011) The energy cost of Zumba exercise. Off J Am Coll Sports Med 43:S329Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sternlicht E, Frisch F, Sumida KD (2013) Zumba® Fitness workouts: are they an appropriate alternative to running or cycling? Sport Sci Health 9:155–159. doi:10.1007/s11332-013-0155-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hižnayová K (2013) Exercise intensity during Zumba fitness and Tae-bo aerobics. JHSE 8:S228–S241. doi:10.4100/jhse.2012.8.Proc2.26 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dyrstad SM, Hausken K (2013) Using accelerometer to estimate energy expenditures with four equations in four training sessions. IJASS 25:91–101Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2008) 2008 physical activity guidelines for Americans. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim J, Nitsch D, Wang D, Bakhai A (2006) Uncontrolled trials. In: Wang D, Bakhai A (eds) Clinical trials: a practical guide to design, analysis, and reporting. Remedica, London, pp 15–21Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Swinscow TDV, Campbell MJ (2002) Statistics at square one, 10th edn. BMJ Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Crawford S, Eklund RC (1994) Social physique anxiety, reasons for exercise and attitudes toward exercise settings. J Sport Exerc Psychol 16:70–82Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    World Health Organization (2006) BMI classification. World Health Organization Web. http://apps.who.int/bmi/index.jsp?introPage=intro_3.html. Accessed 21 May 2014
  16. 16.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1996) Physical activity and health: a report of the surgeon general. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Scherer S (2009) Addressing cardiovascular risk as part of physical therapist practice. What about practice recommendations for physical therapists? Cardiopulm Phys Ther J 20:27–29PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gezer E, Çakmakçi E (2011) The effect of eight weeks step-aerobic exercise program on body composition and quality of life of sedentary women. Sci Mov Health 11:97–101Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Talk Stats (2013) Minimum sample size for paired t tests. Talk Stats Web. http://www.talkstats.com/showthread.php/28248-Minimum-sample-size-for-paired-t-tests. Accessed 21 May 2014
  21. 21.
    Hudson Z (2009) Sample size, power and effect size: what all researchers need to know. Phys Ther Sport 10:43–44. doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2009.03.002 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Huitema B (2011) Analysis of covariance and alternatives: statistical methods for experiments, quasi-experiments, and single-case studies, 2nd edn. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    World Health Organization (2007) The challenge of obesity in the WHO European Region and the strategies for response. WHO Regional Office for Europe, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hardman AE, Stensel DJ (2009) Physical activity and health: the evidence explained, 2nd edn. Routledge, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ali AT, Crowther NJ (2009) Factors predisposing to obesity: a review of the literature. JEMDSA 14:81–84Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    St-Onge M-P, Gallagher D (2010) Body composition changes with aging: the cause or the result of alterations in metabolic rate and macronutrient oxidation? Nutrition 26:152–155. doi:10.1016/j.nut.2009.07.004 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Williamson DF, Serdula MK, Anda RF, Levy A, Byers T (1992) Weight loss attempts in adults: goals, duration, and rate of weight loss. Am J Public Health 82:1251–1257. doi:10.2105/AJPH.82.9.1251 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Prentice AM, Black AE, Coward WA, Cole TJ (1996) Energy expenditure in overweight and obese adults in affluent societies: an analysis of 319 doubly-labelled water measurements. Eur J Clin Nutr 50:93–97PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Waluga M (1990) Effect of physical exercise and heat on energy expenditure in obesity. Pol Arch Med Wewn 83:120–126PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    American College of Sports Medicine (2005) ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, 7th edn. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Trochim WMK, Donnelly JP (2008) The research methods knowledge base, 3rd edn. Atomic Dog, MasonGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Arslan F (2011) The effects of an eight-week step-aerobic dance exercise programme on body composition parameters in middle-aged sedentary obese women. ISMJ 12:160–168Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.5, ‘Mirage’FguraMalta
  2. 2.Kunsill Malti għall-iSport (Malta Sports Council, KMS)GziraMalta
  3. 3.Ministry of HealthVallettaMalta

Personalised recommendations