Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The predictive value of drug-induced sleep endoscopy for treatment success with a mandibular advancement device or positional therapy for patients with obstructive sleep apnea

  • Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article
  • Published:
Sleep and Breathing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

As drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) can provide additional diagnostic information on collapse patterns of the upper-airway, it is widely used in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Although more controversial, DISE may also predict the success of treatment with a mandibular advancement device (MAD) and/or positional therapy (PT). In 2018, we proposed a prediction model to investigate the predictive value of passive maneuvers during DISE — such as jaw thrust and changes in body position — on upper-airway patency. Based on the outcomes of various studies, we then adjusted our DISE protocol to better mimic the effect of a MAD, PT, or a combination of both. The aim of this study was to verify whether or not our adjustments would increase the value of DISE as a selection tool.

Methods

This single-center retrospective cohort study involved a consecutive series of patients with OSA. Patients were included if a DISE had been performed in supine and non-supine sleeping position and with and without a boil-and-bite MAD in situ between December 2018 and February 2020. The VOTE scoring system was used to evaluate the obstruction at four levels of the upper-airway.

Results

Among 94 patients included. the median apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) was 16.2 (events/h). As a temporary MAD during DISE reduced obstruction by 54% and jaw thrust by 57%, both mimicked the effect of the custom-made MADs referred to in the literature, which reduces the AHI by 60%. Head-and-trunk rotation reduced obstruction by 55% and thus mimicked the effect of PT, which is known to reduce the AHI by 50%.

Conclusion

A jaw thrust, a temporary MAD, and head-and-trunk rotation during DISE all seem to mimic the treatment effects of MAD and PT. These findings may be of added value when choosing OSA treatment. To prove the predictive value of these maneuvers during DISE, a prospective study should be performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The data that support the finding of this study are available upon reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable

References

  1. Epstein LJ, Kristo D, Strollo PJ Jr, Friedman N, Malhotra A, Patil SP et al (2009) Clinical guideline for the evaluation, management and long-term care of obstructive sleep apnea in adults. J Clin Sleep Med 5(3):263–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Haniffa M, Lasserson TJ, Smith I (2004) Interventions to improve compliance with continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):Cd003531

  3. Richard W, Venker J, den Herder C, Kox D, van den Berg B, Laman M et al (2007) Acceptance and long-term compliance of nCPAP in obstructive sleep apnea. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264(9):1081–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Weaver TE, Grunstein RR (2008) Adherence to continuous positive airway pressure therapy: the challenge to effective treatment. Proc Am Thorac Soc 5(2):173–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. van Maanen JP, Witte BI, de Vries N (2014) Theoretical approach towards increasing effectiveness of palatal surgery in obstructive sleep apnea: role for concomitant positional therapy? Sleep Breath 18(2):341–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sutherland K, Takaya H, Qian J, Petocz P, Ng AT, Cistulli PA (2015) Oral appliance treatment response and polysomnographic phenotypes of obstructive sleep apnea. J Clinical Sleep Med 11(8):861–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ravesloot MJ, de Vries N (2011) Reliable calculation of the efficacy of non-surgical and surgical treatment of obstructive sleep apnea revisited. Sleep 34(1):105–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Benoist LBL, Verhagen M, Torensma B, van Maanen JP, de Vries N (2017) Positional therapy in patients with residual positional obstructive sleep apnea after upper airway surgery. Sleep Breath. 21(2):279–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kastoer C, Benoist LBL, Dieltjens M, Torensma B, de Vries LH, Vonk PE et al (2018) Comparison of upper airway collapse patterns and its clinical significance: drug-induced sleep endoscopy in patients without obstructive sleep apnea, positional and non-positional obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath. 22(4):939–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. De Vito A, Carrasco Llatas M, Ravesloot MJ, Kotecha B, De Vries N, Hamans E et al (2018) European position paper on drug-induced sleep endoscopy: 2017 Update. Clin Otolaryngol. 43(6):1541–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kezirian EJ, Hohenhorst W, de Vries N (2011) Drug-induced sleep endoscopy: the VOTE classification. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268(8):1233–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vonk PE, Beelen A, de Vries N (2018) Towards a prediction model for drug-induced sleep endoscopy as selection tool for oral appliance treatment and positional therapy in obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath 22(4):901–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Beelen A, Vonk PE, de Vries N (2018) Drug-induced sleep endoscopy: the effect of different passive maneuvers on the distribution of collapse patterns of the upper airway in obstructive sleep apnea patients. Sleep Breath. 22(4):909–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vonk PE, Uniken Venema JAM, Hoekema A, Ravesloot MJL, van de Velde-Muusers JA, de Vries N (2020 Jul 15) Jaw thrust versus the use of a boil-and-bite mandibular advancement device as a screening tool during drug-induced sleep endoscopy. J Clin Sleep Med. 16(7):1021–1027. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.8378 PMID: 32056536; PMCID: PMC7954074

  15. Koutsourelakis I, Safiruddin F, Ravesloot M, Zakynthinos S, de Vries N (2012) Surgery for obstructive sleep apnea: sleep endoscopy determinants of outcome. Laryngoscope 122(11):2587–2591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vanderveken OM, Maurer JT, Hohenhorst W, Hamans E, Lin HS, Vroegop AV et al (2013) Evaluation of drug-induced sleep endoscopy as a patient selection tool for implanted upper airway stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med 9(5):433–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cartwright RD (1984) Effect of sleep position on sleep apnea severity. Sleep 7(2):110–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Itasaka Y, Miyazaki S, Ishikawa K, Togawa K (2000) The influence of sleep position and obesity on sleep apnea. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 54(3):340–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ravesloot MJL, Vonk PE, Maurer JT, Oksenberg A, de Vries N. Standardized framework to report on the role of sleeping position in sleep apnea patients. Sleep Breath. 2021 Jan 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-020-02255-2. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33426584.

  20. Dieltjens M, Vroegop AV, Verbruggen AE, Wouters K, Willemen M, De Backer WA, et al. A promising concept of combination therapy for positional obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath. 2015;19(2):637–44.

  21. Benoist L, de Ruiter M, de Lange J, de Vries N (2017) A randomized, controlled trial of positional therapy versus oral appliance therapy for position-dependent sleep apnea. Sleep Med 34:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Oksenberg A, Arons E, Nasser K, Vander T, Radwan H (2010) REM-related obstructive sleep apnea: the effect of body position. J Clin Sleep Med 6(4):343–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhu K, Bradley TD, Patel M, Alshaer H (2017) Influence of head position on obstructive sleep apnea severity. Sleep Breath 21(4):821–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sutherland K, Chan ASL, Ngiam J, Dalci O, Darendeliler MA, Cistulli PA (2018) Awake multimodal phenotyping for prediction of oral appliance treatment outcome. J Clin Sleep Med 14(11):1879–1887

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. F. N. Bosschieter.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (name of institute/committee) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required. The study was submitted to the local advisory board of scientific research (ACWO) and approved by the board of directors (IRB) of OLVG hospital.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bosschieter, P.F.N., Vonk, P.E. & de Vries, N. The predictive value of drug-induced sleep endoscopy for treatment success with a mandibular advancement device or positional therapy for patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath 26, 1153–1160 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-021-02501-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-021-02501-1

Keywords

Navigation