Assessing the likelihood of obstructive sleep apnea: a comparison of nine screening questionnaires
- 650 Downloads
Several questionnaires are available for the screening of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Herein, we compare the performance characteristics of nine available questionnaires for assessing the likelihood of OSA.
Consecutive subjects who underwent polysomnography at the sleep laboratory of the unit were included. Subjects with obstructive events and apnea hypopnea index (AHI) ≥5 were considered to have OSA. The likelihood ratios (LRs) and other performance characteristics were calculated for the following nine questionnaires: Berlin, modified Berlin, STOP, STOP-Bang and OSA50 questionnaires, sleep apnea clinical score (SACS), Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) checklist, and the elbow sign questionnaire.
Two-hundred and ten subjects (mean age, 46.5 years; mean body mass index [BMI], 31.9 kg/m2; 27.1% women) were included. OSA was diagnosed in 78.1% of patients; 49.5% had severe OSA (AHI ≥30). The SACS questionnaire had the highest positive LR (LR+, 5.6) and positive predictive value (95.2%). The modified Berlin questionnaire had the best negative LR (LR−, 0.2) and the highest negative predictive value (57.1%). The STOP-Bang questionnaire also had an LR− of 0.2 if BMI threshold of 25 kg/m2 (like that in the modified Berlin questionnaire) was used. Among individual items of various sleep questionnaires, the highest LR+ was obtained for neck circumference >43 cm (LR+, 4.9), while the best LR− was obtained for snoring and BMI >25 kg/m2 (LR−, 0.2).
The SACS and the STOP-Bang questionnaires (BMI threshold of 25 kg/m2) were found to provide the best positive and negative LRs, respectively, for the prediction of OSA. We believe that information from these questionnaires may help in prioritizing patients for sleep studies in high-volume centers.
KeywordsSleep disordered breathing Sleep apnea OSA Questionnaire Screening
We thank Dr. V. Nagarjuna Maturu for his inputs at the time of designing of this study.
KTP: data collection, analysis, initial drafting, and final approval of the manuscript
ISS: data collection, analysis, initial drafting, and final approval of the manuscript
RA: data collection, analysis, initial drafting, and final approval of the manuscript
ANA: data collection, analysis, initial drafting, and final approval of the manuscript
DB: data collection, analysis, initial drafting, and final approval of the manuscript
SD: involved in conception, data collection, analysis, initial drafting, and final approval of the manuscript, guarantor of the overall content
Compliance with ethical standards
No funding was received for this research.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study for performing the procedure.
- 12.Gross JB, Bachenberg KL, Benumof JL, Caplan RA, Connis RT, Cote CJ, Nickinovich DG, Prachand V, Ward DS, Weaver EM, Ydens L, Yu S (2006) Practice guidelines for the perioperative management of patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on perioperative management of patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology 104:1081–1093 quiz 117-8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Misra A, Chowbey P, Makkar BM, Vikram NK, Wasir JS, Chadha D, Joshi SR, Sadikot S, Gupta R, Gulati S, Munjal YP (2009) Consensus statement for diagnosis of obesity, abdominal obesity and the metabolic syndrome for Asian Indians and recommendations for physical activity, medical and surgical management. J Assoc Physicians India 57:163–170PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Berry RB, Budhiraja R, Gottlieb DJ, Gozal D, Iber C, Kapur VK, Marcus CL, Mehra R, Parthasarathy S, Quan SF, Redline S, Strohl KP, Davidson Ward SL, Tangredi MM (2012) Rules for scoring respiratory events in sleep: update of the 2007 AASM manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events. Deliberations of the sleep apnea definitions Task Force of the American Academy of sleep Medicine. J Clin Sleep Med 8:597–619PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 31.Iber C, Ancoli-Israel S, Chesson AL Jr, Quan SF (2007) The AASM manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events: rules, terminology and technical specifications, 1st edn. American Academy of Sleep Medicine, Westchester, ILGoogle Scholar
- 32.World Health Organization (2000) The Asia Pacific perspective: redefining obesity and its treatment. Health Communications Australia Pty Limited. URL: http://www.wpro.who.int/entity/nutrition/documents/docs/Redefiningobesity.pdf?ua=1. Last accessed on August 17, 2016
- 33.Nagappa M, Liao P, Wong J, Auckley D, Ramachandran SK, Memtsoudis S, Mokhlesi B, Chung F (2015) Validation of the STOP-Bang questionnaire as a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea among different populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 10:e0143697CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 35.Collop NA, Anderson WM, Boehlecke B, Claman D, Goldberg R, Gottlieb DJ, Hudgel D, Sateia M, Schwab R (2007) Clinical guidelines for the use of unattended portable monitors in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in adult patients. Portable monitoring Task Force of the American Academy of sleep Medicine. J Clin Sleep Med 3:737–747PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.Chung F, Yegneswaran B, Liao P, Chung SA, Vairavanathan S, Islam S, Khajehdehi A, Shapiro CM (2008) Validation of the Berlin questionnaire and American Society of Anesthesiologists checklist as screening tools for obstructive sleep apnea in surgical patients. Anesthesiology 108:822–830CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar