Toward a functional definition of ankyloglossia: validating current grading scales for lingual frenulum length and tongue mobility in 1052 subjects
- 1.2k Downloads
Alterations of the lingual frenulum may contribute to oromyofacial dysfunction, speech and swallowing impediments, underdevelopment of the maxillofacial skeleton, and even predispose to sleep breathing disorder. This study aims to assess the utility of existing instruments for evaluation of restricted tongue mobility, describe normal and abnormal ranges of tongue mobility, and provide evidence in support of a reliable and efficient measure of tongue mobility.
A prospective cohort study of 1052 consecutive patients was evaluated during a 3-month period. Age, gender, ethnicity, height, weight, BMI, maximal interincisal mouth opening (MIO), mouth opening with tongue tip to maxillary incisive papillae at roof of mouth (MOTTIP), Kotlow’s free-tongue measurement, and presence of severe tongue-tie were recorded. Secondary outcome measures include tongue range of motion deficit (TRMD, difference between MIO and MOTTIP) and tongue range of motion ratio (TRMR, ratio of MOTTIP to MIO).
Results indicate that MIO is dependent on age and height; MOTTIP and TRMD are dependent on MIO; Kotlow’s free-tongue measurement is an independent measure of free-tongue length and tongue mobility. TRMR is the only independent measurement of tongue mobility that is directly associated with restrictions in tongue function.
We propose the use of tongue range of motion ratio as an initial screening tool to assess for restrictions in tongue mobility. “Functional” ankyloglossia can thus be defined and treatment effects followed objectively by using the proposed grading scale: grade 1: tongue range of motion ratio is >80%, grade 2 50–80%, grade 3 < 50%, grade 4 < 25%.
KeywordsAnkyloglossia Frenulum Tongue tie Oromyofacial dysfunction Classification of ankyloglossia Tongue tie grading scale
The authors would like to thank Reuben Kim DDS PhD ( UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA 90095) for editing of the manuscript.
All the authors met the four criteria for authorship established by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors: Audrey Yoon, Soroush Zaghi, and Stanley Liu were responsible for the conception, design, analysis; drafting and revising the work; and reviewing the manuscript. Rachel Weitzman and Sandy Ha had substantial contributions to the acquisition of data for the work as well as in drafting and revising the work and reviewing the manuscript. Clarice S. Law and Christian Guilleminault had substantial contributions to data analysis, interpretation of data for the work, and revising the work critically for important intellectual content. Additionally, all authors provided final approval of the version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work including ensuring the accuracy and/or integrity of the work.
Compliance with ethical standards
The Stanford REDCap database used for this study was supported by the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through grant UL1 RR025744. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. There was otherwise no financial or material support for this work.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Schoenwolf GC BS, Brauer PR, Francis-West PH (2015) Larsen’s human embryology. vol 5th ed. Churchill LivingstoneGoogle Scholar
- 2.Tsaousoglou P, Topouzelis N, Vouros I, Sculean A (2015) Diagnosis and treatment of ankyloglossia: a narrative review and a report of three cases. Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany: 1985) 47(6):523–534Google Scholar
- 8.Boyd KL, Sheldon SH (2014) Principles and practice of pediatric sleep medicine. Chapter 34—childhood sleep-disorder breathing: a dental perspective. Elsevier Health SciencesGoogle Scholar
- 12.Kotlow LA (1999) Ankyloglossia (tongue-tie): a diagnostic and treatment quandary. Quintessence International 30 (4)Google Scholar
- 13.Hazelbaker AK (1993) The assessment tool for lingual frenulum function (ATLFF): use in a lactation consultant private practiceGoogle Scholar
- 14.Martinelli RLC, Marchesan IQ, Berretin-Felix G (2013) Lingual frenulum evaluation protocol for infants: relationship between anatomic and functional aspects. Rev CEFAC 15(3):599–610Google Scholar
- 21.Guilleminault C, Huseni S, Lo L (2016) A frequent phenotype for paediatric sleep apnoea: short lingual frenulum. ERJ Open Research 2(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00043-2016
- 22.Defabianis P (1999) Ankyloglossia and its influence on maxillary and mandibular development.(a seven year follow-up case report). The Functional orthodontist 17(4):25–33Google Scholar
- 25.Power RF, Murphy JF (2014) Tongue-tie and frenotomy in infants with breastfeeding difficulties: achieving a balance. Archives of disease in childhood:archdischild-2014-306211Google Scholar
- 26.Queiroz MI (2004) Lingual frenulum: classification and speech interference. The International journal of orofacial myology: official publication of the International Association of Orofacial Myology 30:31–38Google Scholar