Abstract
Purpose
Auto-titrating continuous positive airway pressure (APAP) devices were developed to improve treatment efficacy and compliance in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS). Since there are insufficient data on the optimal pressure range setting, we aimed to compare the adherence, efficacy and tolerability of treatment with high-span versus low-span APAP.
Methods
Seventy-six newly diagnosed OSAS patients fulfilling the treatment criteria were randomised to receive high-span (HS, range 4–15cmH2O, n = 38) or low-span (LS, range 8–12cmH2O, n = 38) APAP. Patients were assessed at 1 and 3 months.
Results
Median Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) was 13 (IQR, 6–16) and median apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) was 35.9 (IQR, 27.6–56.3). There were no significant differences in baseline demographic and clinical characteristics between groups. Overall, no significant differences were found at the first month assessment. After 3 months of therapy, we found again no differences in residual AHI or ESS. However, the group HS proved less adherent than group LS, respectively, with median 87 % (IQR, 60.5–97.5) versus 94 % (IQR, 80.0–98.3) of the nights using ≥4 h (P = 0.014) and mean (±SD) usage 5.7 ± 1.6 versus 6.4 ± 1.2 h/night (P = 0.049). The group HS reported more frequently nasal congestion, excessive oronasal dryness and nocturnal awakenings of at least moderate intensity, the latter with statistical significance (P = 0.005).
Conclusions
Both pressure ranges appear to be equally effective to correct AHI and to improve symptoms. Though, patients with high-span APAP were less compliant to treatment, raising issues about the tolerability of wide pressure range settings of these devices.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Young T, Palta M, Dempsey J, Skatrud J, Weber S, Badr S (1993) The occurrence of sleep-disordered breathing among middle-aged adults. N Engl J Med 328(17):1230–1235
McNamara SG, Grunstein RR, Sullivan CE (1993) Obstructive sleep apnea. Thorax 48(7):754–764
Dong JY, Zhang YH, Qin LQ (2013) Obstructive sleep apnea and cardiovascular risk: meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Atherosclerosis 229(2):489–495
Castronovo V, Scifo P, Castellano A, Aloia MS, Iadanza A, Marelli S, Cappa SF, Strambi LF, Falini A (2014) White matter integrity in obstructive sleep apnea before and after treatment. Sleep 37(9):1465–1475
Montserrat JM, Ferrer M, Hernandez L, Farre R, Vilagut G, Navajas D, Badia JR, Carrasco E, de Pablo J, Ballester E (2001) Effectiveness of CPAP treatment in daytime function in sleep apnea syndrome: a randomized controlled study with an optimized placebo. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164(4):608–613
McNicholas WT (2007) Cardiovascular outcomes of CPAP therapy in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 293(4):R1666–1670
Engleman HM, Martin SE, Kingshott RN, Mackay TW, Deary IJ, Douglas NJ (1998) Randomized placebo controlled trial of daytime function after continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy for the sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome. Thorax 53(5):341–345
Karimi M, Hedner J, Häbel H, Nerman O, Grote L (2014) A Sleep Apnea-Related Risk of Motor Vehicle Accidents is Reduced by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: Swedish Traffic Accident Registry Data. Sleep
Berthon-Jones M (1993) Feasibility of a self-setting CPAP machine. Sleep 16(8):S120–123
Behbehani K, Yen F-C, Burk JR, Lucas EA, Axe JR (1995) Automatic control of airway pressure for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 42(10):1007–1015
Konermann M, Sanner B, Vyleta M, Laschewski F, Groetz J, Sturm A, Zidek W (1998) Use of conventional and self-adjusting nasal continuous positive airway pressure for treatment of severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Chest 113(3):714–718
Massie CA, McArdle N, Hart RW, Schmidt-Nowara WW, Lankford A, Hudgel DW, Gordon N, Douglas NJ (2003) Comparison between automatic and fixed positive airway pressure therapy in the home. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 167(1):20–23
Senn O, Brack T, Matthews F, Russi EW, Bloch KE (2003) Randomized short-term trial of two autoCPAP devices versus fixed continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168(12):1506–1511
Lofaso F, Desmarais G, Leroux K, Zalc V, Fodil R, Isabey D, Louis B (2006) Bench evaluation of flow limitation detection by automated continuous positive airway pressure devices. Chest 130(2):343–349
Abdenbi F, Chambille B, Escourrou P (2004) Bench testing of auto-adjusting positive airway pressure devices. Eur Respir J 24(4):649–658
Smith I, Lasserson TJ (2009) Pressure modification for improving usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines in adults with obstructive sleep apnoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003531.pub3
Ip S, D’Ambrosio C, Patel K, Obadan N, Kitsios GD, Chung M, Balk EM (2012) Auto-titrating versus fixed continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review with meta-analyses. Syst Rev 1 (20). doi:10.1186/2046-4053-1-20
Morgenthaler TI, Aurora RN, Brown T, Zak R, Alessi C, Boehlecke B, Chesson AL Jr, Friedman L, Kapur V, Maganti R, Owens J, Pancer J, Swick TJ, Standards of Practice Committee of the AASM (2008) Practice parameters for the use of autotitrating continuous positive airway pressure devices for titrating pressures and treating adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: an update for 2007. Sleep 31(1):141–147
American Academy of Sleep Medicine (2005) International classification of sleep disorders. Diagnostic and coding manual, 2nd edn. American Academy of Sleep Medicine, Westchester
Epstein LJ, Kristo D, Strollo PJ Jr, Friedman N, Malhotra A, Patil SP, Ramar K, Rogers R, Schwab RJ, Weaver EM, Weinstein MD, Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (2009) Clinical guideline for the evaluation, management and long-term care of obstructive sleep apnea in adults. J Clin Sleep Med 5(3):263–276
Johns MW (1991) A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep 14(6):540–545
Soares Pires F, Drummond M, Marinho A, Sampaio R, Pinto T, Gonçalves M, Neves I, Pinto C, Sucena M, Winck JC, Almeida J (2013) Effectiveness of a group education session on adherence with APAP in obstructive sleep apnea–a randomized controlled study. Sleep Breath 17(3):993–1001
Sampaio RS, Pereira MG, Winck JC (2012) Adaptation of the sleep apnea quality of life index (SAQLI) to Portuguese obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients. Rev Port Pneumol 18(4):166–174
Kribbs NB, Pack AI, Kline LR, Smith PL, Schwartz AR, Schubert NM, Redline S, Henry JN, Getsy JE, Dinges DF (1993) Objective measurement of patterns of nasal CPAP use by patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis 147(4):887–895
Ryan S, Doherty LS, Nolan GM, McNicholas WT (2009) Effects of heated humidification and topical steroids on compliance, nasal symptoms, and quality of life in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome using nasal continuous positive airway pressure. J Clin Sleep Med 5(5):422–427
Sullivan CE, Issa FG, Berthon-Jones M, Eves L (1981) Reversal of obstructive sleep apnea by continuous airway pressure applied through the nares. Lancet 1(8225):862–865
Patel SR, White DP, Malhotra A, Stanchina ML, Ayas NT (2003) Continuous positive airway pressure therapy for treating sleepiness in a diverse population with obstructive sleep apnea: results of a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 163(5):565–571
Zimmerman ME, Arnedt JT, Stanchina M, Millman RP, Aloia MS (2006) Normalization of memory performance and positive airway pressure adherence in memory-impaired patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Chest 130(6):1772–1778
Dantas AP, Winck JC, Figueiredo-Braga M (2014) Adherence to APAP in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: effectiveness of a motivational intervention. Sleep Breath. doi:10.1007/s11325-014-1024-7
Valentin A, Subramanian S, Quan SF, Berry RB, Parthasarathy S (2011) Air leak is associated with poor adherence to autoPAP therapy. Sleep 34(6):801–806
Acknowledgments
We thank Cristina Carrondo, Elisabete Santa Clara, Ermelinda Eusébio, Joana Pipa, Patrícia Dantas, Paulo Viana and Teresa Santiago for selecting the patients, performing the sleep studies and manually evaluating the records.
Conflict of interest
T Pinto has received financial support from Linde and Vitalaire (Healthcare Providers) for attending symposia and honoraria for speaking at symposia from Philips. After the conclusion of the study, JC Winck has started working in a global position for Linde. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The study protocol was approved by our institution’s Ethics Committee. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Comment
In the era of increasing long-term auto-titrating positive airway pressure (APAP) device use for OSA treatment, this study helps sleep physicians improve adherence without substantive effects on OSA control. This randomised controlled trial evaluates the effect of high-span (4–15 cm water) and low-span (8–12 cm water) APAP initial settings on efficacy and adherence over a 3-month time span. The authors find that there is no difference in efficacy between the treatment arms and improved adherence with the low-span APAP settings. These findings indicate that there may be significant differences in long-term adherence based on initial PAP therapy settings. Long-term studies are needed to further clarify the issue; however, it may be prudent in selected patients at the start of therapy to do a trial of low-span APAP with short-term follow-up.
Anna May
Cleveland, OH
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bastos, H.N., Cardoso, A.V., Castro, A.S. et al. Randomised short-term trial of high-span versus low-span APAP for treating sleep apnoea. Sleep Breath 20, 183–190 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-015-1203-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-015-1203-1