Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The 20-min trial of the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test is profoundly affected by motivation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sleep and Breathing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessment of the ability to maintain wakefulness, although very important both for research and for clinical purposes, is still equivocal. The current gold standard is considered the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT), although there are two different potential protocols to perform it and the normal reference range has been determined on selected populations. The effect of potential “penalty” on failing the test (i.e., presenting sleepiness) has not been seriously studied. We therefore planned this study to examine the effect of motivation on the MWT results in a potentially sleepy population. We hypothesized that with the knowledge that participants may lose their driving license if they fail the test, the results would indicate significantly less sleepiness than reported for other populations. Fifty-four consecutive subjects at high risk of sleepiness referred to the sleep laboratory for evaluation of their ability to maintain wakefulness were studied. All were referred by the National Council for Driving Safety, knowing that if they failed the test, their driving license would not be renewed. Referral reasons were previously diagnosed: obstructive sleep apnea (OSA; 43%), sleep-related accident (7%), or other causes to suspect sleepiness. All underwent a full-night polysomnography (PSG) followed by MWT, five trials of 20 min each (MWT20). Of the 54 participants, 13 were treated for OSA and 28 had untreated OSA, 21 of them had severe OSA (Respiratory Disturbance Index >30/h). Seventy-four percent of the participants had a BMI >30 kg/m2. Only 5 of the participants fell asleep in any of the MWT trials (one to five trials), which could not be predicted by severity of OSA, age, BMI, or variables derived from the previous night PSG. Of the 21 patients with severe untreated OSA, only 1 patient fell asleep during the MWT20. We conclude that motivation profoundly affects the MWT results, raising the question what should be considered normal or abnormal when sleepy results may cause penalty or other practical implications. In addition, we believe that these results suggest that for renewal of driving license purposes, the MWT20 is insufficient. We speculate that MWT40, with tighter cutoff threshold, would be a more effective tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parsons M (1986) Fits and other causes of loss of consciousness while driving. Q J Med 58:295–303

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mitler MM, Carskadon MA, Czeisler CA et al (1988) Catastrophes, sleep, and public policy: consensus report. Sleep 11:100–109

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Horne JA, Reyner LA (1995) Sleep related vehicle accidents. BMJ 310:565–567

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Horne J, Reyner L (1999) Sleep related accidents: a review. Occup Environ Med 56:289–294

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pack AI, Pack AM, Rodgman E, Cucchiara A, Dinges DF, Schwab CW (1995). Characteristics of crashes attributed to the driver having fallen asleep. Accid Anal Prev 27(6):769–775

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Findley LJ, Suratt PM (2001) Serious motor vehicle crashes: the cost of untreated sleep apnea. Thorax 56(7):508–512 Arch IVol., July

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. George CF, Nickerson PW, Hanly PPJ, Millar TW, Kryger MH (1987) Sleep apnea patients have more automobile accidents. Lancet 1(8556):447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Horstmann S, Hess CW, Bassetti C, Gugger M, Mathis J (2000) Sleepiness-related accidents in sleep apnea patients. Sleep 23(3):383–389 May 1

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Teran-Santos J, Jimenez-Gomez A, Cordero-Guevara J (1999) The association between sleep apnea and the risk of traffic accidents. Cooperative Group Burgos-Santander. N Engl J Med 340(11):847–851

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cassel W, Ploch T, Peter JH, von Wichert P (1991) Risk of accidents in patients with nocturnal respiration disorders. Pneumologie 45(Suppl 1):271–275

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Haraldsson PO, Carenfelt C, Lysdahl M, Tingvall C (1995) Does uvulopalatopharyngoplasty inhibit automobile accidents? Laryngoscope 105(6):657–661

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Findley L, Smith C, Hooper J et al (2000) Treatment with nasal CPAP decreases automobile accidents in patients with sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 161:857–859

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Findley L, Smith C, Hooper J et al (2000) Treatment with nasal CPAP decreases automobile accidents in patients with sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 161:857–859

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Krieger J, Meslier N, Lebrun T, Levy P, Phillip-Joet F, Sailly JC, Racineux JL (1997) Accidents in obstructive sleep apnea patients treated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure: a prospective study. The Working Group ANTADIR, Paris and CRESGE, Lille, France. Association Nationale de Traitement a Domicile des Insuffisants Respiratoires. Chest 112(6):1561–1566

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. George C (2001) Reduction in motor vehicle collisions following treatment of sleep apnoea with nasal CPAP. Thorax 56:508–512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Edward J (2002) Stepanski controversies in the measurement of daytime sleepiness. Sleep Med Rev 6(2):79–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Johns M (1998) Rethinking the assessment of sleepiness. Sleep Med Rev 2:3–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dement WC, Carskadon MA, Richardson G (1978) Excessive daytime sleepiness in the sleep apnea syndrome. In: Guilleminault C, Dement WC (eds) Sleep apnea syndromes. Alan R. Liss, New York, pp 23–46

    Google Scholar 

  19. Greenberg GD, Watson RK, Deptula D (1987) Neuropsychological dysfunction in sleep apnea. Sleep 10(3):254–262

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kingshott RN, Engleman HM, Deary IJ, Douglas NJ (1998) Does arousal frequency predict daytime function? Eur Respir J 12(6):1264–1270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chugh DK, Weaver TE, Dinges DF (1996) Neurobehavioral consequences of arousals. Sleep 19(10 Suppl):S198–S201 (Review)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Martin SE, Engleman HM, Deary IJ, Douglas NJ (1996) The effect of sleep fragmentation on daytime function. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 153(4 Pt 1):1328–1332

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Stepanski E, Lamphere J, Badia P, Zorick F, Roth T (1984) Sleep fragmentation and daytime sleepiness. Sleep 7(1):18–26

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zucconi M, Oldani A, Ferini-Strambi L, Calori G, Castronovo C (1995) Smirne SEEG arousal pattern in habitual snorers with and without obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). J Sleep Res 4(2):107–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sauter C, Asenbaum S, Popovic R, Bauer H, Lamm C, Klosch G, Zeitlhofer J (2000) Excessive daytime sleepiness in patients suffering from different levels of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. J Sleep Res 9(3):293–301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Johns MW (1991) A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep 14(6):540–545

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Carskadon MA, Dement WC (1977) Sleep tendency: an objective measure of sleep loss. Sleep Res 6:200

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bonnet MH, Arand DL (1998) Sleepiness as measured by modified multiple sleep latency testing varies as a function of preceding activity. Sleep 21(5):477–483

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mitler MM, Gujavarty KS, Browman CP (1982) Maintenance of wakefulness test: a polysomnographic technique for evaluation treatment efficacy in patients with excessive somnolence. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 53(6):658–661

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sangal RB, Thomas L, Mitler MM (1992) Maintenance of wakefulness test and multiple sleep latency test. Measurement of different abilities in patients with sleep disorders [see comments]. Chest 101(4):898–902

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sangal RB, Thomas L, Mitler MM (1992) Disorders of excessive sleepiness. Treatment improves ability to stay awake but does not reduce sleepiness. Chest 102(3):699–703

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sangal RB, Mitler MM, Sangal JM (1999) Subjective sleepiness ratings (Epworth sleepiness scale) do not reflect the same parameter of sleepiness as objective sleepiness (maintenance of wakefulness test) in patients with narcolepsy. Clin Neurophysiol 110(12):2131–2135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Poceta JS, Timms RM, Jeong DU, Ho SL, Erman MK, Mitler MM (1992) Maintenance of wakefulness test in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Chest 101(4):893–897

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Doghramji K, Mitler MM, Sangal RB, Shapiro C, Taylor S, Walsleben J, Belisle C, Erman MK, Hayduk R, Hosn R, O’Malley EB, Sangal JM, Schutte SL, Youakim JM (1997) A normative study of the maintenance of wakefulness test (MWT). Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 103(5):554–562

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Harma M, Suvanto S, Popkin S, Pulli K, Mulder M, Hirvonen K (1998) A dose–response study of total sleep time and the ability to maintain wakefulness. J Sleep Res 7(3):167–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Littner MR, Kushida C, Wise M, Davila DG, Morgenthaler T, Lee-Chiong T, Hirshkowitz M, Daniel LL, Bailey D, Berry RB, Kapen S, Kramer M (2005) Standards of Practice Committee of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Practice parameters for clinical use of the multiple sleep latency test and the maintenance of wakefulness test. Sleep 28:113–121

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Banks S, Barnes M, Tarquinio N, Pierce RJ, Lack LC, McEvoy RD (2004) The Maintenance of Wakefulness Test in normal healthy subjects. Sleep 27:799–802

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Arand D, Bonnet M, Hurwitz T, Mitler M, Rosa R, Sangal RB (2005) The clinical use of the MSLT and MWT. Sleep 28:123–144

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rechtschaffen A, Kales A (1968) A manual of standardized terminology, techniques and scoring system for sleep stages of human subjects. Brain Information Service/Brain Research Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  40. Banks S, Barnes M, Tarquinio N, Pierce RJ, Lack LC, McEvoy RD (2004) Factors associated with maintenance of wakefulness test mean sleep latency in patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnoea and normal subjects. J Sleep Res 13:71–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Browman CP, Mitler MM (1988) Hypersomnia and the perception of sleep–wake states: some preliminary findings. Percept Mot Skills 66:463–470

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Sleep Laboratory, Rambam Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, 31096, Israel

    Roni Shreter, Ron Peled & Giora Pillar

Authors
  1. Roni Shreter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ron Peled
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Giora Pillar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giora Pillar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shreter, R., Peled, R. & Pillar, G. The 20-min trial of the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test is profoundly affected by motivation. Sleep Breath 10, 173–179 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-006-0072-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-006-0072-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation