Advertisement

Sleep and Breathing

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 77–86 | Cite as

Available Techniques for Objective Assessment of Upper Airway Narrowing in Snoring and Sleep Apnea

  • Christian E. Faber
  • Luisa Grymer
Review Article

Abstract

A number of techniques are available to determine the level of obstructive predominance in snoring and in the obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS): lateral cephalography, awake endoscopy, awake endoscopy with the Müller maneuver, endoscopy during sleep, endoscopy with nasal continuous positive airway pressure during sleep, fluoroscopy, CT scanning, MR scanning, manometry, and acoustic reflections. Data from different studies using various methods suggest that different patients have different patterns of narrowing or collapse of the pharynx.

No reference standard exists for the determination of the predominant obstructive level during obstructive events, so further investigations are necessary to improve and validate existing methods and develop new techniques. These would improve our understanding of the pathophysiology of OSAHS and snoring and help to select the correct treatment option for different patients. This article lists criteria that must be used to assess the available techniques for diagnosis of obstruction level in snoring and OSAHS. The advantages and limitations of each diagnostic technique are summarized, with emphasis on the acoustic reflectometry technique.

Keywords

Obstructive sleep apnea acoustic reflection diagnosis upper airway endoscopy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Young T, Palta M, Dempsey J, Skatrud J, Weber S, Badr S. The occurrence of sleep-disordered breathing among middle-aged adults. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1230–1235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jennum P, Sjol A. Epidemiology of snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea in a Danish population, age 30-60. J Sleep Res 1992;1:240–244Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wright J, Johns R, Watt I, Melville A, Sheldon T. Health effects of obstructive sleep apnoea and the effectiveness of continuous positive airways pressure: a systematic review of the research evidence. BMJ 1997;314:851–860Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Petri N, Suadicani P, Wildschiodtz G, Bjorn Jorgensen J. Predictive value of Müller maneuver, cephalometry and clinical features for the outcome of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. Evaluation of predictive factors using discriminant analysis in 30 sleep apnea patients. Acta Otolaryngol 1994;114:565–571Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sher AE, Thorpy MJ, Shprintzen RJ, Spielman AJ, Burack B, McGregorPA. Predictive value of Müller maneuver in selection of patients for uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. Laryngoscope 1985;95:1483–1487Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sher AE, Schechtman KB, Piccirillo JF. The efficacy of surgical modifications of the upper airway in adults with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Sleep 1996;19:156–177PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bridgman SA, Dunn KM. Surgery for obstructive sleep apnoea (Cochrane Review)The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2001. Oxford; Update SoftwareGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pepin JL, Levy P, Veale D, Ferretti G. Evaluation of the upper airway in sleep apnea syndrome. Sleep 1992;15 (suppl 6):S50–S55Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Doghramji K, Jabourian ZH, Pilla M, Farole A, LindholmRN. Predictors of outcome for uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. Laryngoscope 1995;105:311–314Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Katsantonis GP, Maas CS, Walsh JK. The predictive efficacy of the Müller maneuver in uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. Laryngoscope 1989;99:677–680Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Skatvedt O. Localization of site of obstruction in snorers and patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a comparison of fiberoptic nasopharyngoscopy and pressure measurements. Acta Otolaryngol 1993;113:206–209Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ritter CT, Trudo FJ, Goldberg AN, Welch KC, Maislin G, SchwabRJ. Quantitative evaluation of the upper airway during nasopharyngoscopy with the Müller maneuver. Laryngoscope 1999;109:954–963Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Faber CE, Grymer L, Norregaard O, Hilberg O. Flextube reflectometry for localization of upper airway narrowing—a preliminary study in models and awake subjects. Respir Med 2001;95:631–638Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Croft CB, Pringle M. Sleep nasendoscopy: a technique of assessment in snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea. Clin Otolaryngol 1991;16:504–509Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Isono S, MorrisonDL, Launois SH, Feroah TR, Whitelaw WA, Remmers JE. Static mechanics of the velopharynx of patients with obstructive sleep apnea. J Appl Physiol 1993;75:148–154Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Remmers JE, Launois S, Feroah T, WhitelawWA. Mechanics of the pharynx in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Prog Clin Biol Res 1990;345:261–268Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dolly FR, Block AJ. Effect of flurazepam on sleep-disordered breathing and nocturnal oxygen desaturation in asymptomatic subjects. Am J Med 1982;73:239–243Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bonora M, St JohnWM, BledsoeTA. Differential elevation by protriptyline and depression by diazepam of upper airway respiratory motor activity. Am Rev Respir Dis 1985;131:41–45Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schwab RJ, Goldberg AN. Upper airway assessment: radiographic and other imaging techniques. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1998;31:931–968Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tvinnereim M, Cole P, Haight JS, HoffsteinV. Diagnostic airway pressure recording in sleep apnea syndrome. Acta Otolaryngol 1995;115:449–454Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Woodson BT, Wooten MR. A multisensor solid-state pressure manometer to identify the level of collapse in obstructive sleep apnea. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992;107:651–656Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chervin RD, Aldrich MS. Effects of esophageal pressure monitoring on sleep architecture. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;156:881–885Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hudgel DW. Variable site of airway narrowing among obstructive sleep apnea patients. J Appl Physiol 1986;61:1403–1409Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shepard JrJW, Gefter WB, Guilleminault C, et al. Evaluation of the upper airway in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 1991;14:361–371Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Riley R, Guilleminault C, Herran J, Powell N. Cephalometric analyses and flow-volume loops in obstructive sleep apnea patients. Sleep 1983;6:303–311Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Miles PG, Vig PS, Weyant RJ, Forrest TD, Rockette HE. Craniofacial structure and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome—a qualitative analysis and meta-analysis of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996;109:163–172Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fransson AM, Svenson BA, Isacsson G. The effect of posture and a mandibular protruding device on pharyngeal dimensions: a cephalometric study. Sleep Breath 2002;6:55–68Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Haponik EF, Smith PL, Bohlman ME, Allen RP, Goldman SM, Bleecker ER. Computerized tomography in obstructive sleep apnea. Correlation of airway size with physiology during sleep and wakefulness. Am Rev Respir Dis 1983;127:221–226Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Suratt PM, Dee P, Atkinson RL, Armstrong P, WilhoitSC. Fluoroscopic and computed tomographic features of the pharyngeal airway in obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis 1983;127:487–492Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stein MG, Gamsu G, de Geer G, GoldenJA, Crumley RL, Webb WR. Cine CT in obstructive sleep apnea. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;148:1069–1074Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shepard JW, Stanson AW, Sheedy PF, Westbrook PR. Fast-CT evaluation of the upper airway during wakefulness in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Prog Clin Biol Res 1990;345:273–279Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Viviano JS. Acoustic reflection: review and clinical applications for sleep-disordered breathing. Sleep Breath 2002;6:129–149Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ryan CF, Lowe AA, Li D, FleethamJA. Magnetic resonance imaging of the upper airway in obstructive sleep apnea before and after chronic nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;144:939–944Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lauder R, MuhlZF. Estimation of tongue volume from magnetic resonance imaging. Angle Orthod 1991;61:175–184Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kanal E, Shellock FG, TalagalaL. Safety considerations in MR imaging. Radiology 1990;176:593–606Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jackson AC, Butler JP, Millet EJ, Hoppin JrFG, Dawson SV. Airway geometry by analysis of acoustic pulse response measurements. J Appl Physiol 1977;43:523–536Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fredberg JJ, Wohl ME, Glass GM, Dorkin HL. Airway area by acoustic reflections measured at the mouth. J Appl Physiol 1980;48:749–758Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Brooks LJ, Castile RG, Glass GM, Griscom NT, Wohl ME, Fredberg JJ. Reproducibility and accuracy of airway area by acoustic reflection. J Appl Physiol 1984;57:777–787Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hoffstein V, Zamel N. Tracheal stenosis measured by the acoustic reflection technique. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984;130:472–475Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jackson AC, Krevans JrJR. Tracheal cross-sectional areas from acoustic reflections in dogs. J Appl Physiol 1984;57:351–353Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Brooks LJ, Byard PJ, Fouke JM, Strohl KP. Reproducibility of measurements of upper airway area by acoustic reflection. J Appl Physiol 1989;66:2901–2905Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Huang J, Itai N, Hoshiba T, et al. A new nasal acoustic reflection technique to estimate pharyngeal cross-sectional area during sleep. J Appl Physiol 2000;88:1457–1466Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Faber CE, Hilberg O, Jensen FT, NorregaardO, Grymer L. Flextube reflectometry for determination of sites of upper airway narrowing in sleeping obstructive sleep apnoea patients. Respir Med 2001;95:639–648Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Faber CE, Hilberg O, Grymer L. Flextube reflectometry for level diagnosis in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea and snoring. Rhinology 2002;40:122–128Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Faber CE, Grymer L, Hilberg O, Norregaard O. Flextube reflectometry and pressure recordings for level diagnosis in obstructive sleep apnoea. Rhinology 2002;40:203–210Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Djupesland PG, Lyholm B. Technical abilities and limitations of acoustic rhinometry optimised for infants. Rhinology 1998;36:104–113Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian E. Faber
    • 1
  • Luisa Grymer
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of OtorhinolaryngologyUniversity HospitalOdenseDenmark
  2. 2.Grymer Plastic Surgery ClinicAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations