Comparison of 4D-MicroSPECT and MicroCT for Murine Cardiac Function
- 419 Downloads
The objective of this study was to compare a new generation of four-dimensional micro-single photon emission computed tomography (microSPECT) with microCT for the quantitative in vivo assessment of murine cardiac function.
Four-dimensional isotropic cardiac images were acquired from anesthetized normal C57BL/6 mice with either microSPECT (n = 6) or microCT (n = 6). One additional mouse with myocardial infarction (MI) was scanned with both modalities. Prior to imaging, mice were injected with either technetium tetrofosmin for microSPECT or a liposomal blood pool contrast agent for microCT. Segmentation of the left ventricle (LV) was performed using Vitrea (Vital Images) software, to derive global and regional function.
Measures of global LV function between microSPECT and microCT groups were comparable (e.g., ejection fraction = 71 ± 6 % microSPECT and 68 ± 4 % microCT). Regional functional indices (wall motion, wall thickening, regional ejection fraction) were also similar for the two modalities. In the mouse with MI, microSPECT identified a large perfusion defect that was not evident with microCT.
Despite lower spatial resolution, microSPECT was comparable to microCT in the quantitative evaluation of cardiac function. MicroSPECT offers an advantage over microCT in the ability to evaluate simultaneously myocardial radiotracer distribution and function, simultaneously. MicroSPECT should be considered as an alternative to microCT and magnetic resonance for preclinical cardiac imaging in the mouse.
Key wordsMurine cardiac functional imaging Molecular imaging MicroSPECT MicroCT Dynamic microSPECT Micro-CT Four-dimensional (4D) cardiac imaging 99mTc tetrofosmin Mice Cardiovascular imaging
- 5.Constantinides C (2013) Chapter 14: study of the murine cardiac mechanical function using magnetic resonance imaging: the current status, challenges, and future perspectives. In: Andrade A (ed) Practical applications in biomedical engineering. InTech Open Science Publications. ISBN: 978-953-51-0924-2Google Scholar
- 12.Wiesmann F, Ruff J, Hiller KH et al (2000) Developmental changes of cardiac function and mass assessed with MRI in neonatal, juvenile, and adult mice. Am J Physiol 278(2):H652–H657Google Scholar
- 25.Badea CT, Johnston S, Johnson B et al (2008) A dual micro-CT system for small animal imaging. In: Hsieh J, Samei E (eds) Medical imaging 2008: physics of medical imaging. SPIE, Bellingham, Proceedings of SPIE (vol 6913, article CID no. 147)Google Scholar
- 33.Vital Images Inc. Vitrea® reference guide (VPMC-10119F).Google Scholar
- 34.Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V et al (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105(4):539–542PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Ennis D (2007) Bullseye polar data plot. MATLAB Central file exchange. http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/16458-bullseye-polar-data-plot. Accessed 12 Feb 2013
- 39.de Jonge GJ, van Ooijen PM, Overbosch J et al (2011) Comparison of (semi-)automatic and manually adjusted measurements of left ventricular function in dual source computed tomography using three different software tools. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27(6):787–794PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Ashton JR, Befera N, Clark D, et al. (2013) Anatomical and functional imaging of myocardial infarction in mice using micro-CT and eXIA 160 contrast agent. Contrast Media and Molecular Imaging. doi:10.1002/cmmi.1557