Skip to main content
Log in

Toward Quantitative Small Animal Pinhole SPECT: Assessment of Quantitation Accuracy Prior to Image Compensations

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Molecular Imaging and Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We assessed the quantitation accuracy of small animal pinhole single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) under the current preclinical settings, where image compensations are not routinely applied.

Procedures

The effects of several common image-degrading factors and imaging parameters on quantitation accuracy were evaluated using Monte-Carlo simulation methods. Typical preclinical imaging configurations were modeled, and quantitative analyses were performed based on image reconstructions without compensating for attenuation, scatter, and limited system resolution.

Results

Using mouse-sized phantom studies as examples, attenuation effects alone degraded quantitation accuracy by up to −18% (Tc-99m or In-111) or −41% (I-125). The inclusion of scatter effects changed the above numbers to −12% (Tc-99m or In-111) and −21% (I-125), respectively, indicating the significance of scatter in quantitative I-125 imaging. Region-of-interest (ROI) definitions have greater impacts on regional quantitation accuracy for small sphere sources as compared to attenuation and scatter effects. For the same ROI, SPECT acquisitions using pinhole apertures of different sizes could significantly affect the outcome, whereas the use of different radii-of-rotation yielded negligible differences in quantitation accuracy for the imaging configurations simulated.

Conclusions

We have systematically quantified the influence of several factors affecting the quantitation accuracy of small animal pinhole SPECT. In order to consistently achieve accurate quantitation within 5% of the truth, comprehensive image compensation methods are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weissleder R, Mahmood U (2001) Molecular imaging. Radiology 219:316–33. May

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pomper MG (2001) Molecular imaging: an overview. Acad Radiol 8:1141–53. Nov

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pomper MG (2005) Translational molecular imaging for cancer. Canc Imag 5:S16–26. Spec No A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beekman F, van der Have F (2007) The pinhole: gateway to ultra-high-resolution three-dimensional radionuclide imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34:151–161. Feb

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Meikle SR, Kench P, Kassiou M, Banati RB (2005) Small animal SPECT and its place in the matrix of molecular imaging technologies. Phys Med Biol 50:R45–R61. Nov 21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Acton PD, Choi SR, Plossl K, Kung HF (2002) Quantification of dopamine transporters in the mouse brain using ultra-high resolution single-photon emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 29:691–698. May

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Acton PD, Thomas D, Zhou R (2006) Quantitative imaging of myocardial infarct in rats with high resolution pinhole SPECT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 22:429–434. Jun

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alvarez-Fischer D, Blessmann G, Trosowski C et al (2007) Quantitative [I-123]FP-CIT pinhole SPECT imaging predicts striatal dopamine levels, but not number of nigral neurons in different mouse models of Parkinson’s disease. Neuroimage 38:5–12. Oct 15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu ZL, Kastis GA, Stevenson GD et al (2002) Quantitative analysis of acute myocardial infarct in rat hearts with ischemia–reperfusion using a high-resolution stationary SPECT system. J Nucl Med 43:933–939. Jul

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tsui BMW, Frey EC, Zhao X, Lalush DS, Johnston RE, Mccartney WH (1994) The importance and implementation of accurate 3d compensation methods for quantitative SPECT. Phys Med Biol 39:509–530. Mar

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsui BMW, Zhao XD, Frey EC, Mccartney WH (1994) Quantitative single-photon emission computed-tomography—basics and clinical considerations. Semin Nucl Med 24:38–65. Jan

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Deloar HM, Watabe H, Aoi T, Iida H (2003) Evaluation of penetration and scattering components in conventional pinhole SPECT: phantom studies using Monte Carlo simulation. Phys Med Biol 48:995–1008. Apr 21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Li J, Jaszczak RJ, Coleman RE (1995) Quantitative small field-of-view pinhole spect imaging—initial evaluation. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 42:1109–1113. Aug

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hwang AB, Taylor CC, VanBrocklin HF, Dae MW, Hasegawa BH (2006) Attenuation correction of small animal SPECT images acquired with I-125-iodorotenone. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 53:1213–1220. Jun

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen C-L, Wang Y, Lee JJS, Tsui BMW (2008) Integration of SimSET photon history generator in GATE for efficient Monte Carlo simulations of Pinhole SPECT. Med Phys 35:3278–3284. July

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Harrison RL, Haynor DR, Gillispie SB, Vannoy SD, Kaplan MS, Lewellen TK (1993) A public-domain simulation system for emission tomography-photon tracking through heterogeneous attenuation using importance sampling. J Nucl Med 34:P60–P60. May

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jan S, Santin G, Strul D et al (2004) GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT. Phys Med Biol 49:4543–4561. Oct 7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang YC, Tsui BMW (2007) Pinhole SPECT with different data acquisition geometries: Usefulness of unified projection operators in homogeneous coordinates. IEEE Trans Med Imag IEEE 26:298–308. Mar

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Segars WP, Tsui BMW, Frey EC, Johnson GA, Berr SS (2004) Development of a 4-D digital mouse phantom for molecular imaging research. Mol Imag Biol 6:149–159. May–Jun

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Drs. Eric Frey and Yong Du (Johns Hopkins Univ.) for their valuable suggestions. Special thanks go to Martin Stump for carefully editing the manuscript. This project is partially supported by the US Public Health Service Grants EB168 and EB1558.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin M. W. Tsui.

Additional information

Significance: We assessed the quantitation accuracy of small animal pinhole SPECT, providing reference information for the current preclinical studies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, CL., Wang, Y., Lee, J.J.S. et al. Toward Quantitative Small Animal Pinhole SPECT: Assessment of Quantitation Accuracy Prior to Image Compensations. Mol Imaging Biol 11, 195–203 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-008-0181-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-008-0181-0

Key words

Navigation