Tissue disruption and extraction methods for metabolic profiling of an invertebrate sentinel species
- First Online:
- 615 Downloads
Metabolic profiling of tissues needs special attention, because the compartmentalization of cellular constituents will be abolished by sample homogenization. This loss of partitioning leads to protein and metabolite instability in extracts, and therefore metabolite extraction protocols need to ensure very rapid inactivation of macromolecules as well as solubilization of metabolites. There are many published methods for tissue metabolome analysis, but no universally accepted standard, and a lack of measurable quality benchmarks. We developed a protocol for efficient tissue disruption and metabolite extraction of the earthworm Lumbricus rubellus guided by prior biological knowledge as well as metrics based on the data. In particular, we identified an unusual degree of instability of L. rubellus tissue extracts, and evaluated different approaches such as heating and filtration to counteract this. Finally, we evaluated four different solvent systems for comprehensive metabolite extraction using three analytical platforms (1H NMR spectroscopy, GC–MS, and direct-infusion FT-ICR-MS), and also compared bead-beating and cryogenic milling for tissue disruption. Initially we ranked methods by common analytical criteria (e.g. numbers and total intensity of detected peaks) in order to compare protocols. These approaches to assess protocol suitability proved to be inadequate to judge earthworm tissue extraction methods because of sample instability. Existing tissue extraction protocols should not be assumed to be automatically applicable to novel species.
KeywordsMetabolomics NMR Lumbricus rubellus Tissue extraction Instability GC–MS Direct infusion mass spectrometry Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR-MS)
- Darwin, C. (1838). On the formation of mould. Proceedings of the Geological Society of London, 2, 574–576.Google Scholar
- Dettmer, K., Nurnberger, N., Kaspar, H., Gruber, M. A., Almstetter, M. F., & Oefner, P. J. (2011). Metabolite extraction from adherently growing mammalian cells for metabolomics studies: Optimization of harvesting and extraction protocols. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 399(3), 1127–1139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dunn, W. (2010). Metabolite identification in metabolomics. Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News, 30(8), 36–37.Google Scholar
- Duportet, X., Aggio, R., Carneiro, S., & Villas-Boas, S. G. (2011). The biological interpretation of metabolomic data can be misled by the extraction method used. Metabolomics. doi:10.1007/s11306-011-0324-1.
- Frampton, G. K., Jansch, S., Scott-Fordsmand, J. J., Rombke, J., & Van den Brink, P. J. (2006). Effects of pesticides on soil invertebrates in laboratory studies: A review and analysis using species sensitivity distributions. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 25(9), 2480–2489.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Payne, T. G., Southam, A. D., Arvanitis, T. N., & Viant, M. R. (2009). A signal filtering method for improved quantification and noise discrimination in fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry-based metabolomics data. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 20(6), 1087–1095.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Römisch-Margl, W., Prehn, C., Bogumil, R., Röhring, C., Suhre, K., & Adamski, J. (2011). Procedure for tissue sample preparation and metabolite extraction for high-throughput targeted metabolomics. Metabolomics. doi:10.1007/s11306-011-0293-4
- Roots, B. I. (1956). The water relations of earthworms. II. Resistance to desiccation and immersion, and behaviour when submerged and when allowed a choice of environment. Journal of Experimental Biology, 33(1), 29–44.Google Scholar
- Southam, A. D., Payne, T. G., Cooper, H. J., Arvanitis, T. N., & Viant, M. R. (2007). Dynamic range and mass accuracy of wide-scan direct infusion nanoelectrospray fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry-based metabolomics increased by the spectral stitching method. Analytical Chemistry, 79(12), 4595–4602.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spurgeon, D. J., Weeks, J. M., & Van Gestel, C. A. M. (2003). A summary of eleven years progress in earthworm ecotoxicology. Pedobiologia, 47(5–6), 588–606.Google Scholar