Skip to main content
Log in

Zusammenarbeit zwischen organisatorischen Gruppen: Ein Literaturüberblick über die Intergroup Relations-, Schnittstellen- und Boundary Spanning-Forschung

  • State-of-the-Art-Artikel
  • Published:
Journal für Betriebswirtschaft Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die Zusammenarbeit zwischen organisatorischen Gruppen (Abteilungen, Projektteams etc.) leistet einen entscheidenden Beitrag zur Effizienz und Effektivität von Unternehmen. Drei Forschungsströme liefern wichtige Erkenntnisse hinsichtlich der Zusammenarbeit zwischen organisatorischen Gruppen. In diesem Beitrag werden der gegenwärtige Forschungsstand (State-of-the-Art) zu Intergroup Relations, Schnittstellenmanagement und Boundary Spanning zusammengefasst und Massnahmen zur Förderung der Zusammenarbeit zwischen organisatorischen Gruppen abgeleitet. Der Beitrag schliesst mit einer zusammenfassenden Würdigung, in der Unterschiede und Gemeinsamkeiten der Forschungsrichtungen aufgezeigt werden. Darüber hinaus werden wichtige Themen für notwendige weitere Forschung zur Zusammenarbeit zwischen Gruppen skizziert.

Abstract

The quality of collaboration between organizational groups (departments, project teams, etc.) contributes decisively to an organization’s efficiency and effectiveness. Three research streams provide important insights regarding the cooperation between organizational groups. This article summarizes the state of the art in research on Intergroup Relations, Interdepartmental Interaction, and Boundary Spanning and derives recommendations for the management of intergroup collaboration based on each research stream. Moreover, the article identifies the differences and similarities between the three research streams and closes with an outlook on necessary future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Adler PS (1995) Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: The case of the design/manufacturing interface. Organiz Sci 6:147–167

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alderfer CP (1987) An intergroup perspective on group dynamics. In: Lorsch J (ed) Handbook of organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, USA, 190–222

  3. Allport GW (1954/1979) The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA, USA

  4. Amir Y (1969) Contact hypothesis in ethnic relations. Psychol Bull 71:319–342

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ancona DG (1990) Outward bound: Strategies for team survival in an organization. Acad Manag J 33:334–365

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1988) Beyond task and maintenance: Defining external functions in groups. Group Organiz Stud 13:468–494

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1990a) Improving the performance of new product teams. Res Technol Manag 33:25–30

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1990b) Information technology and work groups: The case of new product teams. In: Galagher J, Kraut R, Egido C (eds) Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work. Hillsdale, USA, 173–190

  9. Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1992a) Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organiz Sci 3:321–341

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1992b) Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin Sci Q 37:634–665

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ashforth BE, Mael F (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. Acad Manag Rev 14:20–39

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ayers DJ, Gordon GL, Schoenbachler DD (2001) Integration and new product development success: The role of formal and informal controls. J Appl Business Res 17:133–148

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bartunek JM, Foster-Fishman PG, Keys CB (1996) Using collaborative advocacy to foster intergroup cooperation: A joint insider-outsider investigation. Human Relat 49:701–733

    Google Scholar 

  14. Beck D, Diehl M (1997) Fortschritte in der Kleingruppenforschung: Beiträge der Forschung im deutschsprachigen Raum – 1984–1995. In: Mandl H (Hrsg) Bericht über den 40. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in München 1996. Schwerpunktthema Wissen und Handeln. Göttingen, 149–154

  15. Becker-Beck U, Beck D, Eberhardt D (1998) Muster und Strategien in der sozialen Interaktion zwischen Gruppen – Illustrative Interaktionsanalysen des Verlaufs zweier Erörterungstermine. In: Ardelt-Gattinger E, Lechner H, Schlögl W (Hrsg) Gruppendynamik: Anspruch und Wirklichkeit der Arbeit in Gruppen. Göttingen, 96–112

  16. Brett JM, Rognes JK (1986) Intergroup relations in organizations. In: Goodman PS et al. (eds) Designing effective workgroups. San Francisco, USA, 202–236

  17. Brewer MB, Miller N (1984) Beyond the Contact Hypothesis: Theoretical Perspectives on Desegregation. In: Miller N, Brewer MB (eds) Groups in Contact – The Psychology of Desegregation. Orlando, USA, 281–301

  18. Brockhoff K, Chakrabarti AK (1988) R&D/marketing linkage and innovation strategy: Some West German experience. IEEE Transact Eng Manag 35:167–174

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brockhoff K, Hauschildt J (1993) Schnittstellen-Management – Koordination ohne Hierarchie. Z Führung Organis 6:396–403

    Google Scholar 

  20. Brown LD (1983) Managing conflict at organizational interfaces. Reading, USA

  21. Brown R, Abrams D (1986) The effects of intergroup similarity and goal interdependence on intergroup attitudes and task performance. J Exp Soc Psychol 22:78–92

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brown R, Vivian J, Hewstone M (1999) Changing attitudes through intergroup contact: The effects of group membership salience. Eur J Soc Psychol 29:741–764

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW (1992) Hierarchical linear models: Applications and methods. Newbury Park, CA, USA

  24. Chan M (1989) Intergroup conflict and conflict management in the R&D divisions of four aerospace companies. IEEE Transact Eng Manag 36:95–104

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cohen SG, Bailey DE (1997) What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. J Manag 23:239–290

    Google Scholar 

  26. Comelli G (1985) Training als Beitrag zur Organisationsentwicklung. Handbuch der Weiterbildung für die Praxis in Wissenschaft und Verwaltung, Band 4. München

  27. Cook SW (1978) Interpersonal and attitudinal outcomes in co-operating interracial groups. J Res Devel Educ 12:97–113

    Google Scholar 

  28. Crosby F, Gonzalez-Intal AM (1984) Relative deprivation and equity theories: Felt injustice and the undeserved benefit of others. In: Folger R (ed) Social psychological perspectives. New York, USA, 141–166

  29. Denison DR, Hart SL, Kahn Joel A (1996) From chimneys to cross-functional teams: Developing and validating a diagnostic model. Acad Manag J 39:1005–1023

    Google Scholar 

  30. Deutsch M (1976) Konfliktregulierung: Konstruktive und destruktive Prozesse. München

  31. Domsch M, Gerpott H, Gerpott T (1989) Technologische Gatekeeper in der industriellen F&E. Merkmale und Leistungswirkungen. Stuttgart

  32. Dougherty D (1992) Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organiz Sci 3:179–202

    Google Scholar 

  33. Elmes M, Wilemon D (1991) A field study of intergroup integration in technology-based organizations. J Eng Technol Manag 7:229–250

    Google Scholar 

  34. Friedlander F (1987) The ecology of work groups. In: Lorsch JW (ed) Handbook of organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, USA, 301–314

  35. Gaertner SL, Rust MC, Dovidio JF, Bachman BA, Anastasio PA (1994) The contact hypothesis: The role of a common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias. Small Group Res 25:224–249

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gerpott H (1991) F&E und Produktion: Theoretische und empirische Analysen zu Schnittstellenproblemen im Innovationsprozess unter besonderer Berücksichtigung personalwirtschaftlicher Aspekte. München

  37. Giessner S (2003) Eine Intergruppenperspektive auf Unternehmensfusionen. In: Strähle J (Hrsg) Interkulturelle Mergers & Acquisitions. Eine interdisziplinäre Perspektive. Berlin

  38. Gladstein DL (1984) Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Admin Sci Q 29:499–517

    Google Scholar 

  39. Griffin A, Hauser JR (1996) Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature. J Prod Innov Manag 13:191–215

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gupta AK, Raj SP, Wilemon DL (1986) A model for studying R&D-marketing interface in the product innovation process. J Marketing 50:7–17

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gupta AK, Raj SP, Wilemon DL (1987) Managing the R&D-marketing interface. Res Manag: 38–43

  42. Gupta AK, Wilemon DL (1988) The credibility-cooperation connection at the R&D-marketing interface. J Prod Innov Manag 5:20–31

    Google Scholar 

  43. Guzzo RA, Shea GP (1992) Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In: Dunnette MD, Hough LM (ed) Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Palo Alto, USA, Band 3, 269–313

  44. Harvey D, Brown DR (1996) An experimental approach to organization development, 5th edn. Upper Saddle River, USA

  45. Haslam SA (2001) Psychology in Organizations. The Social Identity Approach. London

  46. Hennessy J, West M (1999) Intergroup behavior in organizations: A field test of social identity theory. Small Group Res 30:361–382

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hewstone M, Greenland K (2000) Intergroup conflict. Int J Psychol 35:136–144

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hise RT, O’Neal L, Parasuraman A, McNeal JU (1990) Marketing/R&D interaction in new product development: Implications for new product success rates. J Prod Innov Manag 7:142–155

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE, Nixon RD (1993) A mid-range theory of interfunctional integration, its antecedents and outcomes. J Eng Technol Manag 10:161–185

    Google Scholar 

  50. Högl M, Gemünden HG (2001) Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organiz Sci 12:435–449

    Google Scholar 

  51. Högl M, Weinkauf K, Gemünden HG (2004) Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: A longitudinal study. Organiz Sci 15:38–55

    Google Scholar 

  52. Högl M, Weinkauf K (in press) Managing task interdependencies in multi-team projects: A longitudinal study. J Manag Stud

  53. Insko CA, Schopler J, Hoyle RH, Dardis GJ, Graetz KA (1990) Individual-group discontinuity as a function of fear and greed. J Personal Soc Psychol 58:68–79

    Google Scholar 

  54. Kahn KB (1996) Interdepartmental integration: A definition with implications for product development performance. J Prod Innov Manag 13:137–151

    Google Scholar 

  55. Katz D, Kahn RL (1966) The social psychology of organizations. New York, USA

  56. Katz R (1982) The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Admin Sci Q 27:81–104

    Google Scholar 

  57. Katz R, Tushman M (1981) An investigation into managerial roles and career paths of gatekeepers and project supervisors in a major R&D facility. R&D Manag 11:103–110

    Google Scholar 

  58. Kessler EH, Chakrabarti AK (1996) Innovation speed: A concepual model of context, antecedents, and outcomes. Acad Manag Rev 21:1143–1191

    Google Scholar 

  59. Kieser A (1991) Innovation und Kooperation. In: Wunderer R (Hrsg) Kooperation: Gestaltungsprinzipien und Steuerung der Zusammenarbeit zwischen Organisationseinheiten. Stuttgart, 159–174

  60. Kohli AK, Jaworski BJ (1990) Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. J Marketing 54:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  61. Krackhardt D, Hanson JR (1993) Informal networks: The company behind the chart. Harvard Business Rev: 104–111

  62. Labianca G, Brass DJ, Gray B (1998) Social networks and perceptions of intergroup conflict: The role of negative relationships and third parties. Acad Manag J 41:55–67

    Google Scholar 

  63. Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin Sci Q 12:1–47

    Google Scholar 

  64. McCann J, Galbraith JR (1981) Interdepartmental relations. In: Nystrom PC, Starbuck WH (eds) Handbook of organizational design. New York, USA, 60–84

  65. Menon A, Jaworski BJ, Kohli AK (1997) Product quality: Impact of interdepartmental interactions. J Acad Marketing Sci 25:187–200

    Google Scholar 

  66. Millson MR, Wilemon DL (2002) The impact of organizational integration and product development proficiency on market success. Indust Marketing Manag 31:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  67. Moenaert RK, Souder WE (1990) An information transfer model for integrating marketing and R&D personnel in new product development projects. J Prod Innov Manag 7:91–118

    Google Scholar 

  68. Moenaert RK, Souder WE (1996) Context and antecedents of information utility at the R&D/ marketing interface. Manag Sci 42:1592–1610

    Google Scholar 

  69. Mohrman SA, Cohen SG, Mohrman AM Jr (1995) Designing team-based organizations. San Francisco, USA

  70. Montoya-Weiss MM, Massey AP, Song M (2001) Getting it together: Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Acad Manag J 44:1251–1262

    Google Scholar 

  71. Mott PE (1972) The characteristics of effective organizations. New York, USA

  72. Mulvey PM, Ribbens BA (1999) The effects of intergroup competition and assigned group goals on group efficacy and group effectiveness. Small Group Res 30:651–677

    Google Scholar 

  73. Nelson RE (1989) The strength of strong ties: Social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations. Acad Manag J 32:377–401

    Google Scholar 

  74. Nihtila J (1999) R&D-production integration in the early phases of new product development projects. J Eng Technol Manag 16:55–81

    Google Scholar 

  75. O’Keefe RD, Chakrabarti AK (1981) Coordination and communication in industrial innovation: The R&D/marketing interface problem. Baylor Business Stud 12:35–43

  76. Olson EM, Walker Jr OC, Ruekert RW, Bonner JM (2001) Patterns of cooperation during new product development among marketing, operations and R&D: Implications for project performance. J Prod Innov Manag 18:258–271

    Google Scholar 

  77. O’Sullivan A (2003) Dispersed collaboration in a multi-firm, multi-team product-development project. J Eng Technol Manag 20:93–116

    Google Scholar 

  78. Pettigrew TF (1998) Intergroup contact theory. Annu Rev Psychol 49:65–85

    Google Scholar 

  79. Ruekert RW, Walker Jr OC (1987) Marketing’s interaction with other functional units: A conceptual framework and empirical evidence. J Marketing 51:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  80. Salomo S, Gemünden HG, Billing F (2003) Dynamisches Schnittstellenmanagement radikaler Innovationsvorhaben. In: Herstatt C, Verworn B (Hrsg) Management der frühen Innovationsphasen: Grundlagen – Methoden – neue Ansätze. Wiesbaden, 169–194

  81. Schein EH (1969) Process consultation: Its role in organization development. Reading, USA

  82. Scott SG (1997) Social identification effects in product and process development teams. J Eng Technol Manag 14:97–127

    Google Scholar 

  83. Sherif M (1966) In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Boston, USA

  84. Sherif M, Sherif CW (1969) Social psychology. New York, USA

  85. Sherman JD, Souder WE, Jenssen SA (2000) Differential effects of the primary forms of cross functional integration on product development cycle time. J Prod Innov Manag 17:257–267

    Google Scholar 

  86. Smith KG, Carroll SJ, Ashford SJ (1995) Intra- and interorganizational cooperation: Toward a research agenda. Acad Manag J 38:7–23

    Google Scholar 

  87. Souder WE (1981) Disharmony between R&D and marketing. Indust Marketing Manag 10:67–73

  88. Souder WE, Moenaert RK (1992) Integrating marketing and R&D project personnel within innovation projects: An information uncertainty model. J Manag Stud 29:485–512

    Google Scholar 

  89. St John CH, Hall Jr EH (1991) The interdependency between marketing and manufacturing. Indust Marketing Manag 20:223–229

    Google Scholar 

  90. Steinmann H, Schreyögg G (1997) Management: Grundlagen der Unternehmensführung. Wiesbaden

  91. Stephan WG (1985) Intergroup relations. In: Lindzey G, Aronson E (eds) Handbook of social psychology, vol 2. New York, USA, 599–658

  92. Tajfel H (1982) Gruppenkonflikt und Vorurteil: Entstehung und Funktion sozialer Stereotypen. Bern

  93. Tajfel H, Turner JC (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Worchel S, Austin WG (eds) Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago, USA, 7–24

  94. Thibaut JW, Kelley HH (1967) The social psychology of groups, 5th edn. New York

  95. Thomas K (1990) Conflict and conflict management. In: Dunnette MD, Hough LM (ed) Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, vol 3. Palo Alto, USA, 889–935

  96. Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York, USA

  97. Tjosvold D, Dann V, Wong C (1992) Managing conflict between departments to serve customers. Human Relat 45:1035–1054

    Google Scholar 

  98. Turner JC (1987) Rediscovering the social group. A self-categorization theory. Oxford

  99. Tushman ML (1977) Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Admin Sci Q 22:587–605

    Google Scholar 

  100. Tushman ML, Katz R (1980) External communication and project performance: An investigation into the role of gatekeepers. Manag Sci 26:1071–1085

    Google Scholar 

  101. Van Dick R (2001) Identification in organizational contexts: Linking theory and research from social and organizational psychology. Int J Manag Rev 3:265–283

    Google Scholar 

  102. Wagner U, Zick A (1990) Psychologie der Intergruppenbeziehungen: Der ,Social Identity Approach‘. Gruppendynamik 21:319–330

  103. Walter A (1998) Der Beziehungspromotor: Ein personaler Gestaltungsansatz für erfolgreiches Relationship Marketing. Wiesbaden

  104. Yan A, Louis MR (1999) The migration of organizational functions to the work unit level: Buffering, spanning, and bringing up boundaries. Human Relat 52:25–47

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Högl.

Additional information

JEL classifications

L20, M10, M12

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weinkauf, K., Högl, M., Gemünden, H. et al. Zusammenarbeit zwischen organisatorischen Gruppen: Ein Literaturüberblick über die Intergroup Relations-, Schnittstellen- und Boundary Spanning-Forschung. JfB 55, 85–111 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-005-0005-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-005-0005-0

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation