Skip to main content

The Divergent Paths of the Ethnic Parties in Post-Communist Transitions

Abstract

This article provides a comparative analysis of the evolution of ethnic parties in the three most important ethnically divided societies in post-communist Europe (not including the former Yugoslav republics): Bulgaria, Romania and Slovakia. The starting point of the analysis is the fall of communism, when ethnicity re-emerged as a salient issue in each of these three states and a potential source of conflict. In these contexts, the ethnic parties formed by each of the most important minorities in these states became crucial actors of transition, but also highly relevant at the level of highly volatile party systems. In contrast with the wide majority of the literature, which focuses on single case studies, this exploratory study allowed for a comparative multi-dimensional account of the development and evolution of several ethnic parties, paying attention to the national contexts. Rather than reaching major conclusions that can be generalized for ethnic parties in general, this article provides a good base for further comparative studies on ethnic parties as crucial actors in divided societies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    This definition has its own shortcomings. “Overwhelming” is a vague term, while the expression “serves the interests of that group” is too idealistic. Nevertheless, it is a good working definition for the purpose of this paper.

  2. 2.

    In the context of the Muslim religion, names are sacred, because Allah calls each person by name after death. Thus, a change in name is regarded as endangering the believer’s chances for eternal life (Zhelyazkova 2001, pp. 62–63).

  3. 3.

    The Revolution began with the protests in Timisoara sparked by the house arrest of Hungarian Protestant priest Tokes Laszlo.

  4. 4.

    See [http://www2.essex.ac.uk/elect/electer/ro_er_nl.htm], accessed on December 26th, 2006.

  5. 5.

    The first right-wing Hungarian government passed a Constitution in which the Hungarian state declares itself responsible for the faith of Hungarian communities living across the borders. Moreover, important politicians at that time asked for the annulment of the Trianon Treaty, signed after World War One, which led to massive territorial losses for Hungary, including Transylvania, parts of Vojvodina (in Serbia) and what is today Southern Slovakia.

  6. 6.

    The first article of the Romanian Constitution is “Romania is a nation state, sovereign and independent, unitary and indivisible.” The italics are not employed in the original text.

  7. 7.

    The NSF broke into two—PD and FDSN. The latter then changed its name into PDSR and was again renamed PSD in 2001, following several mergers with smaller parties. Throughout the paper, NSF, FDSN, PDSR and PSD stand for the same party.

References

  1. Bugajski J (1994) Ethnic politics in Eastern Europe: a guide to nationality policies, organizations, and parties. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bugajski J (2002) Political parties of Eastern Europe: a guide to politics in the post-Communist Era. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chandra K (2005) Ethnic parties and democratic stability. Perspect Politics 3(2):235–252

    Google Scholar 

  4. Craiutiu A (1995) A dilemma of dual identity: the democratic alliance of Hungarians in Romania. East Eur Constit Rev 4(2):43–49

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deegan-Krause K (2006) Elected affinities: democracy and party competition in Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dimitrijevic N (2002) Ethno-nationalized states of eastern europe: is there a constitutional alternative? Stud East Eur Thought 54(4):245–269

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dostal O 2005 Ethnic minorities. Available at [http://www.institute.sk/upload/pdf/2005_global_minorities.pdf], accessed on 23 March 2011

  8. Friedman E (2005) Electoral system design and minority representation in Slovakia and Macedonia. Ethnopolitics 4(4):381–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Geertz C (1963) Old societies and new states: the quest for modernity in Asia and Africa. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gherghina S (2009) Still waters run deep: party organization and electoral stability in New Democracies, paper presented at the ECPR Joint Session of Workshops, Lisbon

  11. Gherghina S, Jiglau G (2008) The role of ethnic parties in the europeanization process—the Romanian experience. Romanian J Eur Aff 8(2):82–99

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gherghina S, Jiglau G (2011) Explaining ethnic mobilization in post-communist countries. Eur Asia Stud 63(1):49–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gurr T (1993) Minorities at risk: a global view of ethnopolitical conflicts. United States Institute of Peace Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hall JA (ed) (1996) Civil society, theory, history, comparison. Polity press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  15. Horowitz DL (1985) Ethnic groups in conflict. University of California Press, Berkley

    Google Scholar 

  16. Horowitz DL (1993) ‘Democracy in divided societies’, J Democr 4(4):18–38

    Google Scholar 

  17. Horowitz D (2000) The deadly ethnic riot. University of California Press, Berkley

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hristov H (2007) Development of post-communist party systems: Bulgaria and Romania in comparative perspective. MA thesis submitted to the Department of Political Science University at the Central European University

  19. Hutchinson J, Smith AD (1996) Ethnicity. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ishiyama JT, Breuning M (1998) Ethnopolitics in the New Europe. Lynne Reinner Publishers, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson C (2002) Democratic transition in the Balkans: Romania’s Hungarian and Bulgaria’s Turkish Minority (1989–99). Natl Ethn Politics 8(1):1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kantor Z (2008) Institutionalizing nationalism. In: Blasko A, Janusauskiene D (eds) Political transformation and changing identities in central and Eastern Europe. The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  23. Karasimeonov G (2006) Organizational structures and internal party democracy in South Eastern Europe. Gorex Press, Sofia

    Google Scholar 

  24. Karl TL, Schmitter PC (1995) From an iron curtain to a paper curtain: grounding transitologists or students of postcommunism. Slav Rev 54(4):965–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kolarova R (1993) Tacit agreements in the Bulgarian transition to democracy: minority rights and constitutionalism. The University of Chicago Law School Roundtable (working paper)

  26. Kolarova R (2002) Democratization in Bulgaria: recent trends. In: Kaldor M and Vejvoda I (eds), Democratization in Central and Eastern Europe, Continuum International Publishing Group, pp. 151–161

  27. Kuzio T (2000) the national factor In Ukraine’s quadruple transition. Contemp Politics 6(2):143–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kuzio T (2001) Transition in post-communist states: triple or quadruple? Politics 21(3):168–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kymlicka W (1995) Multicultural citizenship. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lewis P (2001) Political parties in post-communist Eastern Europe. Routledge

  31. Linz J, Stepan A (1996) Problems of democratic transition and consolidation, Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  32. Meseznikov G, Gyarfasova O (2008) National populism in Slovakia. Institute for Public Affairs, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mihailescu M (2008) The politics of minimal «Consensus»: interethnic opposition coalitions in post-communist Romania (1990–96) and Slovakia (1990–98). East Eur Politics Soc 22(3):553–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Offe C (1991) Capitalism by democratic design? Democratic theory facing the triple transition in East Central Europe. Soc Res 58(4):865–881

    Google Scholar 

  35. Podoba J (1996) Between rancour and cooperation ethnic conflict in Slovakia. Int J Minor Group Rights 4(34):279–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Przeworski A (1995) Sustainable democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Ragin C (1989) The comparative method. Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press, Berkley

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rose R, Munro N (2009) Parties and elections in new european democracies. ECPR Press, Colchester

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rothschild J (1981) Ethnopolitics: a conceptual framework. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rybar M (2006) Old parties and new: changing patterns of party politics in Slovakia. In: Jungerstam-Mulders S (ed) In post-communist EU member states: parties and party systems. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 147–176

    Google Scholar 

  41. Saideman S (1998) Is pandora’s box half empty or half full? The limited virulence of secessionism and the domestic sources of disintegration. In: Lake D, Rotchild D (eds) The international spread of ethnic conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 127–150

  42. Todorov A (2007) The evolution of the post-communist Bulgarian party system. In: Getova M, Uste AN (eds) The impact of the European Union: case of Bulgaria, case of Turkey. New Bulgarian University Press, Dokuz Eylül University, Sofia, pp 115–131

    Google Scholar 

  43. Volgyi BB (2007) Ethno-nationalism during democratic transition in Bulgaria: political pluralism as an effective remedy for ethnic conflict, YCISS Post-Communist Studies Programme Research Paper Series, Paper Number 003

  44. Weber M (1978) Economy and society. In: Guenther Rothand Claus Wittich (ed). University of California Press, Berkley, pp 3–38

  45. Zhelyazkova A (2001) The bulgarian ethnic model. East Eur Const Rev 1(62):62–66

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergiu Gherghina.

About this article

Cite this article

Jiglau, G., Gherghina, S. The Divergent Paths of the Ethnic Parties in Post-Communist Transitions. Transit Stud Rev 18, 445–457 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11300-011-0212-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Transition
  • Ethnic parties
  • Representation
  • Post-communism

JEL Classification

  • D72