Advertisement

Transition Studies Review

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 134–150 | Cite as

A Subregional Analysis of Universities’ Contribution to Economic and Innovation Performance

  • Zoltán BajmócyEmail author
  • Miklós Lukovics
  • Zsófia Vas
Human Capital, Innovation, Knowledge

Abstract

In recent years several regions have created development strategies to strengthen the regional economic and innovation contribution of universities. Still, it is not at all obvious whether universities’ significant regional contribution is a rule or rather an exception, especially in transition and less developed areas. Present paper addresses three crucial fields that seem to be problematic in the literature. First, we analyze universities’ regional contribution in a transition economy, namely in Hungary. Second we attempt to capture territorial innovation performance by applying an innovation system based approach. Third, we carry out a nationwide analysis on a subregional level. We conclude that regional contributions of Hungarian higher education institutions are modest, way too forceless to catalyze the local economy.

Keywords

Universities’ regional contribution Innovation performance Transition economy Hungary 

JEL Classification

O18 O30 O43 R11 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by the Baross Gábor Innovation Analysis programme of the Hungarian National Office for Research and Technology (BAROSS-DA07-DA-ELEM-07-2008-0001). We are grateful for their comments on the earlier versions of this paper to Imre Lengyel, Philippe Laredo, Andreas Niederl and Siri Brorstad Borlaug.

References

  1. Anselin L, Varga A, Ács JZ (1997) Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. J Urban Econ 42(3):422–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonelli C (2008) The new economics of the university: a knowledge governance approach. J Technol Transfer 33:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong H, Taylor J (2000) Regional economics and policy, 3rd edn. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Arundel A, Hollanders H (2005) EXIS: an exploratory approach to innovation scoreboards. European trend chart on innovation. European Commission, MaastrichtGoogle Scholar
  5. Asheim BT, Coenen L (2005) Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: comparing nordic clusters. Res Policy 34:1173–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Audretsch DB, Feldman MP (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Am Econ Rev 86(3):630–640Google Scholar
  7. Autant-Bernard C (2001) Science and knowledge flows: evidence from French case. Res Policy 30(4):1069–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bajmócy Z (2006) Opportunities of university business incubation in less favoured regions of transition countries. In: 46th congress of European Regional Science Association, Volos, Greece. http://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa06p190.html
  9. Bajmócy Z, Szakálné Kanó I (2009) Measuring the innovation performance of Hungarian subregions. In: Bajmócy Z, Lengyel I (eds) Regional competitiveness, innovation and environment. JATEPress, Szeged, pp 99–121Google Scholar
  10. Bercovitz J, Feldman M (2006) Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: a conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. J Technol Transfer 31:175–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bosma N, Harding R (2006) Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. GEM 2006 Summary Results. Babson College, London Business School. Babson Park, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Buzás N (2003) Organizational elements of knowledge transfer in Hungary: towards a functional system of innovation. In Lengyel I (eds) Knowledge transfer, small and medium-sized enterprises and regional development in Hungary. JATE Press, Szeged, pp 32–46Google Scholar
  13. Clarysse B, Wright M, Lockett A, van de Velde E, Vohora A (2005) Spinning out new ventures: a typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions. Res Policy 20(2):183–216Google Scholar
  14. Cooke P (2004) Regional innovation systems, an evolutionary approach. In: Cooke P, Heidenreich M, Braczyk HJ (eds) Regional innovation systems. The role of governance in a globalized world. Routledge, London, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  15. Csizmadia Z, Rechnitzer J (2005) A magyar városhálózat innovációs potenciálja. In: Grósz A, Rechnitzer J (szerk.) Régiók és nagyvárosok innovációs potenciálja Magyarországon, MTA RKK, Pécs, Győr, pp 147–180Google Scholar
  16. Csizmadia Z, Erdős F, Grosz A, Smahó M, Tilinger A (2008) Innováció a Nyugat-Dunántúlon, 2008. MTA RKK, Pécs, GyGoogle Scholar
  17. Doloreux D (2002) What should we know about regional systems of innovation. Technol Soc 24:243–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Edquist C (2005) Systems of innovation approaches. Their emergence and characteristics. In: Edquist C (ed) Systems of innovation. Technologies, institutions and organizations. Routledge, London, pp 1–35Google Scholar
  19. EIS (2008) European innovation scoreboard 2008. Comparative analysis of innovation performance. Inno Metrics, BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  20. Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L (2000) The dynamics of innovation: from national system and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Res Policy 2:109–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Etzkowitz H, Webster A, Gebhardt C, Terra BRC (2000) The future of the university, the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Res Policy 2:313–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Feldman PM (1994) The university and economic development: the case of Johns Hopkins University and Baltimore. Econ Develop Q 8(1):67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Florida R, Tingali I (2004) Europe in the creative age. DEMOS. http://www.demos.co.uk/publications/creativeeurope
  24. Goldfarb B, Henrekson M (2003) Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property. Res Policy 32:639–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goldstein H, Renault CS (2004) Contributions of universities to regional economic development: a quasi-experimental approach. Region Stud 38(7):733–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. HCSO (2004) A statisztikai kistérségek 2002–2003-as felülvizsgálatának összefoglaló eredményei. Munkaanyag. Központi Statisztikai Hivatal (Hungarian Central Statistics Office), BudapestGoogle Scholar
  27. Hollanders H (2006) European regional innovation scoreboard. European Trend Chart on Innovation, MaastrichtGoogle Scholar
  28. Inzelt A (2004) The evolution of university, industry, government relationships during the transition. Res Policy 33(6–7):975–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Inzelt A, Szerb L (2003) Az innovációs aktivitás vizsgálata ökonometriai módszerekkel. Közgazdasági Szemle 50(11):1002–1021Google Scholar
  30. Kanerva M, Hollanders H, Arundel A (2006) Can we measure and compare innovation in services. 2006 Trend Chart Report. European trend chart on innovation, LuxemburgGoogle Scholar
  31. Lengyel I (2009) Knowledge-based local economic development for enhancing competitiveness in lagging areas of Europe: the case of the University of Szeged. In Varga A (ed) Universities, knowledge transfer and regional development. Geography, Entrepreneurship and Policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenhem, pp 321–349Google Scholar
  32. Lengyel B, Cadil V (2009) Innovation policy challenges in transition countries: foreign business R&D in the Czech Republic and Hungary. Trans Stud Rev 16:174–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lukovics M (2008) Measuring regional disparities: evidence from Hungarian sub-regions. In: Paper presented at the “Culture, cohesion and competitiveness: regional perspectives” 48th congress of the European Regional Science Association, Liverpool, UKGoogle Scholar
  34. Lundval BA (eds) (1992) National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Lundvall BA, Johnson B, Andersen ES, Dalum B (2002) National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Res Policy 31:213–231Google Scholar
  36. Malecki EJ (1997) Technology and economic development: the dynamics of local, regional and national competitiveness. Longman, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  37. Morgan B (2002) Higher education and regional economic development in Wales: an opportunity for demonstrating the efficacy of devolution in economic development. Region Stud 36(1):65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nelson RR (eds) (1993) National innovation systems. A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Nelson RR (1995) Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. J Econ Lit 33(3):48–90Google Scholar
  40. Porter ME, Stern S (2003) The impact of location on global innovation: findings from the national innovative capacity index. The Global Competitiveness Report 2002–2003, WEF, pp 227–252Google Scholar
  41. Tödtling F, Trippl M (2005) One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Res Policy 34:1203–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Varga A (1998) University research and regional innovation: a spatial econometric analysis of academic technology transfers. Kluwer, BostonGoogle Scholar
  43. Varga A (2004) Az egyetemi kutatások regionális gazdasági hatásai a nemzetközi szakirodalom tükrében. Közgazdasági Szemle 51(3):259–275Google Scholar
  44. Varga A (2009) Térszerkezet és gazdasági növekedés. Akadémiai Kiadó, BudapestGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zoltán Bajmócy
    • 1
    Email author
  • Miklós Lukovics
    • 1
  • Zsófia Vas
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and Business AdministrationUniversity of SzegedSzegedHungary

Personalised recommendations