Skip to main content
Log in

Problems and solutions: an ecological view

  • Published:
Mind & Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A problem is a difference between what a person has and wants. A solution is anything that reduces the difference. These two simple definitions form the foundation of an ecological perspective on the often-complex, reciprocal relationships among people, their environments and their behaviours—a perspective that mixes causal ideas from psychology with consequential ideas from economics. The present article offers a brief introduction to this perspective and suggests how it might be instantiated by naturalistic observations and content analyses of narratives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bales RF (1950) Interaction process analysis; a method for the study of small groups. Addison-Wesley Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1989) Human agency in social cognitive theory. Am Psychol 44:1175–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker RG (1968) Ecological psychology: concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner U (1979) The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner J, Goodnow J, Austin G (1956) A study of thinking. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunswik, E. (1954). The conceptual framework of psychology. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, 1(10), Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

  • Campbell J (1949) Hero with a thousand faces. Pantheon Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon J (1982) In pursuit of the colon: a century of scholarly progress. J High Educ 53(1):93–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank R, Cook P (1996) The winner-take-all-society. Penguin Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson J (1966) The senses considered as perceptual systems. Hughton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillie T, Broadbent D (1989) What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity, and complexity. Psychol Res 50(4):243–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin G (1959) Nature and man’s fate. Rinehart, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley H, Holmes J, Kerr N, Reis H, Rusbult C, van Lange P (2003) An Atlas of interpersonal situations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins R (1966) The strategy of model building in population biology. Am Sci 54(4):421–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin K (1936) Principles of Topological Psychology. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1982) Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press.

  • Merton R (1936) The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. Am Sociol Rev 1(6):894–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel W (1973) Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychol Rev 80:252–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell A, Simon H (1980) Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers W (1978) Quantitative analysts of purposive systems: some spadework at the foundations of scientific psychology. Psychol Rev 85(5):417–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers W (1989) Living control systems. Benchmark Publications, Bloomfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling T (2006) Micromotives and macrobehavior. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H (1956) Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychol Rev 63(2):129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slobodkin, L., & Rapoport, A. (1974). An optimal strategy of evolution. Quarterly Review of Biology, 49)3), 181–200.

  • Thorngate W (1988) On the evolution of adjudicated contests and the principle of invidious selection. J Behav Decis Mak 1(1):5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorngate W, Hotta M (1995) Life and luck: survival of the fattest. Simul Gaming 26(1):5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorngate W, Tavakoli M (2005) In the long run: biological versus economic rationality. Simul Gaming 36(1):9–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorngate W, Dawes R, Foddy M (2009) Judging merit. Psychology Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd P, Gigerenzer G (2012) Ecological rationality: intelligence in the world. UK Oxford Scholarship Online, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Warren Thorngate.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thorngate, W. Problems and solutions: an ecological view. Mind Soc 19, 91–102 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-020-00227-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-020-00227-3

Keywords

Navigation