Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A call for complexity: integrated models to solve complex policy problems

  • Published:
Mind & Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research calls for attention to complexity theory and the integration of complexity methodologies in policy research. A complexity approach in research practice requires a systems worldview and recognition of non-linearity, networks, self-organization, emergence, and feedback in policy. Simply, if a phenomenon is complex and can be explored from varied contexts and scales, the conceptual frame, and the methodical approach should be able to address the complexity. Complexity science has the capacity to account for complexity in varied contexts, on varied scales, and with an interrelated and interdependent environment. Further, if policy systems are at times simple, complicated, complex, and chaotic, then complexity mythologies combined with traditional qualitative and quantitative methods can bring to light the workings of the elusive black box. Complexity allows for triangulation of both linear and non-linear methodologies integrating qualitative, quantitative, network analysis, and agent-based models, as well as other methodologies. Complexity science is not the panacea to solve all policy problems with perfection. But if you do not acknowledge the complexity you will be missing out on the opportunity to shape patterns of sustainability, to effectively manage complex policy problems to someday solve them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achorn E (2004) Integrating agent-based models with quantitative and qualitative research methods. Paper presented at the association for active educational researchers http://www.aare.edu.au/04pap/ach04769.pdf

  • Aronson D (1968) Overview of systems thinking. Thinking Page, from http://www.thinking.net/. 26 February 2014

  • Bar-Yam Y (2010) Complexity NECSI summer school course. NECSI, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yam M, Rhoades K, Sweeney LB, Kaput J, Bar-Yam Y (2013) Changes in the teaching and learning process in a complex education system. In: Complex systems perspectives on education and the education system, New England Complex Systems Institute. http://www.necsi.edu/research/management/education/teachandlearn.html

  • Bazeley P (2004) Issues in mixing qualitative and quantitative approaches to research. Paper presented at the 1st international conference—qualitative research in marketing and management, Vienna, Austria

  • Bellavita C (2006) Changing homeland security: shape patterns, not programs. Homeland Security Affair II(3):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Berreby D (1998) Complexity theory: fact free science or business tool. Strategy Bus 10:40–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding KE (1956) General systems theory—the skeleton of science. Manage Sci 2(3):197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BrainyQuote (ed) (2015) Albert Einstein quotes. BrainyMedia.com

  • Bryman A (1988) Quantity and quality in social research. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Capra F (2002) The hidden connections. HarperCollins, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra F (2005) Complexity and life. Theory, Culture and Society 22(33):33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casti JL (1994) Complexification explaining a paradoxical world through the science of surprise. HarperCollins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers P (2000) What can we learn from the theory of complexity? Emergence 2(1):23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coburn CE (2006) Framing the problem of reading instruction: using frame analysis to uncover the microprocesses of policy implementation. Am Educ Res J 43(3):343–379. doi:10.3102/00028312043003343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coveney P, Highfield R (1995) Frontiers of complexity the search for order in a chaotic world. Ballantine Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL (2007) Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

  • Crotty M (1998) The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis B, Sumara D (2006) Complexity and education inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis E (2012) Problem versus symptom. Ration Resour. Retrieved from http://www.rationalpower.com/id30.htm

  • Dictionary.com (2015) Retrieved from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/change?s=t

  • Diepold K, Johnson L, Matheison J (2010) Hybrid systems ABM: global application to world cup soccer & gambling. New England Complex Systems Institute, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar MC, Ewing G, Booth S (2011) Using mixed methods to develop and evaluate complex interventions (Farquhar, Ewing, & Booth, 2011) in palliative care research. Palliat Med 25(8):748–757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan M (1993) Change forces probing the depth of educational reform. The Falmer Press, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan M (2003) Change force with a vengeance. RoutledgeFalmer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ghorbani A, Dechesne F, Dignum V, Jonker C (2014) Enhancing ABM into an inevitable tool for policy analysis. J Policy Complex Syst 1(1):60–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert N (2008) Agent-based models. Sage, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert N, Terna P (1999) How to build and use agent-based models in social science. Mind Soc 1(1):57–72. doi:10.1007/BF02512229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gribbin J (2004) Deep simplicity: Chaos, complexity and the emergence of life. Allen Lane, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez R, Dixon-Román E (2011) Beyond the gap: How can thinking about education comprehensively help us (re)envision mathematics education? In: Atweh B, Graven M, Secada W, Valero P (eds) Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education. Springer Science, New York, pp 21–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadžikadić M (2011) Complexity lectures. Complex Systems Institute, University of North Carolina Charlotte

  • Hedström P (2005) Dissecting the social on the principles of analytical sociology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jick T (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action. Adm Sci Q 24:602–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson L (2009a) Agent-based model overview: a guide for public policy practitioners. Complex Systems Institute, Charlotte

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson N (2009b) Simply complexity a clear guide to complexity theory. Oneworld Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson L (2012) Mini project #2 interview: complexity in qualitative research. The George Washington University

  • Johnson L (2013) Applying complexity to qualitative policy research: an exploratory case study. J Soc Sci Policy Dev 1(1):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson L (2015) Complexity modelling and application to policy research. In: Geyer R, Cairney P (eds) Handbook on complexity and public policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Glos

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones H (2011) Taking responsibility for complexity how implementation can achieve results in the face of complex problems. Overseas Development Institute, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman S (1995) At home in the universe: The search for the laws of self-organization and complexity. Oxford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasky S (2004) Toward a policy framework for analyzing educational systems effects. In: Johns Hopkins University (ed). Center for Research on Educational Students Placed at Risk, Baltimore, pp 1–39

  • Lebel L (2006) Inclusive and adaptive governance. Working paper. Chiang Mai University, Thailand: Unit for social and environmental research

  • Lissack (2013) Epi-thinking. Modes of explanations. Retrieved from http://www.modesofexplanation.org/

  • Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison K (2006) Complexity theory and education. Paper presented at the Asian-Pacific Educational Research Association, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China

  • Ollhoft J, Walcheski M (2002) Stepping in wholes: Introduction to complex systems topics in process adaptive systems. Sparrow Media Group Inc, Eden Prairie

    Google Scholar 

  • Opfer VD, Pedder D (2011) Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Rev Educ Res 81(3):3–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood N (2014) What tools does complex modeling provide for understanding population health & health disparities? Paper presented at the Complex Systems Health Disparities & Population Health: Building Bridges, Bethesda, MD

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action (Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Page SE (2009) Understanding complexity. The Teaching Company, Chantilly

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagels HR (1988) The dreams of reason. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascale R, Millemann M, Gioja L (2000) Surfing the edge of chaos. Crown Business, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd edn. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl A (2002) The big picture: systematic and institutional factors in Chicano school failure and success. In: Valencia RR (ed) Chicano school failure and success: past, present, and future, 2nd edn. RoutledgeFalmer, London, pp 335–3365

    Google Scholar 

  • Peurach D (2011) Seeing complexity in public education: problems, possibilities, and success for all. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ramalingam B, Jones H, Reba T, Young J (2008) Exploring the science of complexity ideas and implications for development and humanitarian efforts (Second ed). Overseas Development Institute, London, pp 1–89

  • Rescher N (1998) Complexity: a philosophical overview. Transaction Publisher, New Brunswick, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson K (2004) Introduction to general systems theory: the skeleton of science reprint. E-CO Special Double Issue 6(1–2):127–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Room G (2011) Complexity, institutions and public policy: agile decision-making in a turbulent world. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sayama H (2010) Fundamentals of modeling. Agent based models. New England Complex Systems Institute, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf FW (1997) Games real actors play: actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott J (2014) What is social network analysis? Retrieved from http://www.bloomsburyacademic.com/view/What-Is-Social-Network-Analysis/chapter-ba-9781849668187-chapter-005.xml;jsessionid=722480E0D7D0C7CF2507EADC4F5AB966

  • Smillov M (2013) Common core: reinforcing failure. American Thinker. Retrieved from http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/08/common_core_reinforcing_failure.html

  • Snowden D (Producer) (2011) Introduction to the Cynefin framework. Retrieved from http://cognitive-edge.com/library/more/video/. November, 2013

  • Stacey RD, Griffin D, Shaw P (2000) Complexity and management: fad or radical challenge to systems thinking? Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori A, Teddlie C (2008) 7 quality of inferences in mixed methods research: calling for an integrative framework1. In: Bergman MM (ed) Advances in mixed methods research. Sage Publications Ltd, London, pp 101–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennix JC (1996) Group model building: facilitating team learning using system dynamics. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss JA (1989) The powers of problem definition: the case of government paperwork. Policy Sci 22:97–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White R (1985) The importance of context in educational research. Res Sci Educ 15:92–102

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf-Branigin M (2013) Using complexity theory for research and program evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • WorldPress.com (2015) Disadvantages of mixed method design. Retrieved from http://lon03.wordpress.com/2012/03/07/disadvantages-of-mixed-method-design/#comment-133

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Complex Systems Institute, University of North Carolina Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA

    Liz Johnson

Authors
  1. Liz Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liz Johnson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johnson, L. A call for complexity: integrated models to solve complex policy problems. Mind Soc 14, 259–271 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-015-0178-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-015-0178-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation