Re-assessing the Heuristics debate
- 274 Downloads
Open image in new window Mark Kelman’s recent book, The Heuristics Debate (HD), has two main goals. First, it seeks to reconstruct the controversy in decision science between Kahneman et al.’s heuristics-and-biases approach and Gigerenzer et al.’s fast-and-frugal heuristics approach. Second, it tries to discuss its implications for jurisprudence and policy-making. This study focuses on the first task only. The study attempts to show that, although HD has several important merits, its interpretation of the controversy misses some crucial aspects. Specifically, HD fails to appreciate that the debate is fundamentally about what a “rational” judgment is in the first place. Moreover, because of this, HD also fails to acknowledge the interplay between normative and methodological considerations. With regard to this aspect, HD’s treatment of the controversy fits into a long tradition. This study takes the opportunity to rectify the error.
I would like to thank Michela Massimi, Lars Penke, and Tillmann Vierkant for discussion of some of the ideas that motivated this paper.
- Berg N, Gigerenzer G (2010) As-if behavioral economics: neoclassical economics in disguise? HEconI 18(1):133–166Google Scholar
- Hammond KR (1996) Human judgment and social policy. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Hammond KR (2007) Beyond rationality. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Stanovich K (2004) The robot’s rebellion. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Stanovich K, West R (2003) Evolutionary versus instrumental goals: how evolutionary psychology misconceives human rationality? In: Over E (ed) Evolution and the psychology of thinking: the debate. Psychological Press, New York, pp 171–230Google Scholar
- Stevens JR (2008) The evolutionary biology of decision making. In: Engel C, Singer W (eds) Better than conscious? Ernst Strüngmann Forum Report 1. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 285–304Google Scholar
- Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
- Wilke A, Todd PM (2012) The evolved foundations of decision-making. In: Dhami MK, Schlottmann A, Waldmann M (eds) Judgment and decision making as a skill: learning, development and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 3–27Google Scholar