Mind & Society

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 229–249 | Cite as

Is neuroeconomics doomed by the reverse inference fallacy?

  • Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde


Neuroeconomic studies are liable to fall into the reverse inference fallacy, a form of affirmation of the consequent. More generally neuroeconomics relies on two problematic steps, namely the inference from brain activities to the engagement of cognitive processes in experimental tasks, and the presupposition that such inferred cognitive processes are relevant to economic theorizing. The first step only constitutes the reverse inference fallacy proper and ways to correct it include a better sense of the neural response selectivity of the targeted brain areas and a better definition of relevant cognitive ontologies for neuroeconomics. This second way also allows increased coherence between the cognitive processes actually involved in neuroeconomics experiments and the theoretical constructs of economics. We suggest means of increasing neural response selectivity in neuroeconomic experimental paradigms. We also discuss how the choice of cognitive ontologies can both avoid implicit reductionist strategies (from economic constructs to neural patterns) and irrelevance, as cognitive processes engaged in experimental tasks may lack immediate bearing on the study of economic behavior. With these joint improvements neuroeconomics can be a progressive science.


Neuroeconomics Reverese inference fallacy Cognitive ontologies Reductionism Cultural neural recycling 


  1. Bastiaansen J, Thioux M, Keysers C (2009) Evidence for mirror systems in emotions. Phil Trans R Soc B 364:2391–2404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bondar I, Leopold D, Richmond D, Victor J, Logothetis N (2009) Long-term stability of visual patterns selective responses of monkey temporal lobe neurons. PLOS One 4:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourgeois-Gironde S, Schoonover C (2008) Cross-talks in economics and neuroscience. Rev Econ Polit 118:35–50Google Scholar
  4. Camille N, Coricelli G, Sallet J, Pradat P, Duhamel JR, Sirigu A (2004) The involvement of the orbitofrontal cortex in the experience of regret. Science 304:1167–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christoff K, Owen A (2006) Improving reverse neuroimaging inference: cognitive domain versus cognitive complexity. Trends Cogn Sci 10:352–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coricelli G, Nagel R (2009) Neural correlates of strategic reasoning in medial prefrontal cortex. PNAS 106:9163–9168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coricelli G, Critchley H, Joffily M, O’Doherty L, Sirigu A, Dolan R (2005) Regret and its avoidance: a neuroimaging study of choice behavior. Nat Neurosci 8:1255–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Quervain D, Fischbacher U, Treyer V, Schellhammer M, Schnyder U, Buck A, Fehr E (2004) The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science 305:1254–1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dehaene S, Cohen L (2008) Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron 56:384–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Q J Econ 75:643–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fehr E, Gächter S (2002) Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415:137–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fodor Jerry (1974) Special sciences: or the disunity of science as a working hypothesis. Synthese 28:97–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gul F, Pesendorfer W (2008) The case for mindless economics. In: Andrew C, Andrew S (eds) The foundations of positive and normative economics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Hsu M, Ahnen C, Quartz S (2008) The right and the good: distributive justice and neural encoding of equity and efficiency. Science 320:1092–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huettel S, Stowe C, Gordon E, Warner B, Platt M (2006) Neural signatures of economic preferences for risk and ambiguity. Neuron 49(5):765–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jeankins A, Neil Macrae C, Mitchell J (2008) Repetition suppression of ventromedial prefrontal activity during judgments of self and others. PNAS 105(11):4507–4512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kable JW, Glimcher PW (2007) The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice. Nat Neurosci 10(12):1625–1633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Laibson D (1997) Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Q J Econ 112(2):443–477 MIT PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Loomes G, Sugden R (1982) Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Econ J 92:805–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McClure SM, Laibson DI, Loewenstein G, Cohen JD (2004) Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science 306(5695):503–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Padoa-Schioppia C, Assad J (2006) Neurons in orbitofrontal cortex encode economic value. Nature 441:223–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Peirce CS (1878) Deduction, induction, and hypothesis. Pop Sci Mon 13:470–482Google Scholar
  23. Poldrack RA (2006) Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends Cogn Sci 10(2):59–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Price CJ, Friston KJ (2005) Functional ontologies for cognition: the systematic definition of structure and function. Cogn Neuropsychol 22:262–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sanfey A, Rilling J, Aronson J, Nystrom L, Cohen J (2003) The Neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science 300:1755–1758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sanfey A, Loewenstein G, McClure S, Cohen J (2006) Neuroeconomics: cross-currents in research on decision-making. Trends Cogn Sci 30:108–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Singer T, Fehr E (2005) The neuroeconomics of mind-reading and empathy. Am Econ Rev 95:340–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut Jean-NicodParisFrance

Personalised recommendations