Mind & Society

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 59–83 | Cite as

Neuro-cybernetics of socio-scientific systems

  • Masudul Alam Choudhury
  • Mohammad Shahadat Hossain


The field of information technology is broadened up to the domain of ‘learning’ systems and cybernetics. In covering this extension of the field due recourse is made to the epistemological basis of theory construction. When so comprehended, information technology becomes a philosophical inquiry on a variety of social, scientific and technological issues. A new idea that we refer to as neuro-cybernetics is born. The term neuro-cybernetics is used to delineate the epistemological field of system and cybernetic study. The above-mentioned phenomenological or the epistemic model of a cybernetic and system type is applied to flood control problem in Bangladesh. This example presents an application of the cybernetic model to a physico-human problem. This is the nature of socio-scientific system. In it, organically unifying relations occur between the environment and the human world, with the objective of controlling the perennial problem of floods by using interactive factors.


Information system System and cybernetic Epistemology Learning systems Computer application 


  1. Al-Ghazali AH [Imam], trans. Buchman D (1998) The niche of lights. Brigham Young University Press, ProvoGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrow JD (1991) Theories of everything, the quest for ultimate explanation. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Buchanan JM (1971) The bases for collective action. General Learning Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Choudhury MA (1995) “A mathematical formalization of the principle of ethical endogeneity”, Kybernetes. Int J Syst Cybern 24(5):11–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Choudhury MA (1996) Economic integration in the Sextet region and the Middle East Peace Accord. Int J World Peace 13(2):67–78Google Scholar
  6. Choudhury MA (1998) A socio-scientific theory of continuous machines. Cybernetica XLI(2–4):251–271Google Scholar
  7. Darwin C (1936) Descent of man (or origin of species). Modern Library, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Einstein A (undated) “The laws of science and the laws of ethics”, in his essays in physics. Philosophical Library, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Feiwel G (ed) (1987) Arrow and the foundations of the theory of economic policy. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Foucault M, trans. Sheridan AM (1972) The archeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. Harper Torchbooks, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Gruber TR (1993) “A translation approach to portable ontologies”. Knowl Acquis 5(2):199–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hammond PJ (1989) On reconciling arrow’s theory of social choice with Harsanyi’s fundamental utilitarianism. In: Feiwel GR (ed) Arrow and the foundation of the theory of economic policy. Macmillan, London, pp 179–221Google Scholar
  14. Hawking SW (1985) “Is the end in sight for theoretical physics? Cambridge University Lecture, Reprinted in Boslough, J. Stephen Hawking’s Universe, Avon Books, New York, pp 119–139Google Scholar
  15. Hawking SW (1988) A brief history of time, from the big bang to black holes. Bantam Books, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  16. Heidegger M, trans. Hofstadter A (1988) “The thesis of modern ontology: the basic ways of being are the being of nature (res extensa) and the being of mind (res cogitans)”. In: The basic problems of phenomenology, Bloomington & Indianapolis, Indiana University Press, IN, pp 122–224Google Scholar
  17. Heisenberg W, Anshen RN (eds) (1958) Physics and philosophy. Harper & Brothers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Holton RJ (1992) Economy and society. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Hubner, K trans. Dixon, PR Jr, Dixon HM (1983) Critique of scientific reason. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  20. Jackson MC (1993) Systems methodology for the management systems. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Johannessen JA (1998) “Organization as social systems: the search for a systemic theory of organizational innovation processes”, Kybernetes. Int J Syst Cybern 27(4 & 5):359–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuhn TS (1970) The structure of scientific revolution. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  23. Luhmann N (1986) The autopoiesis of social systems. In: Geyer F, Van der Zouwen J (eds) Sociocybernetic paradoxes. Sage, Beverly Hills, pp 172–192Google Scholar
  24. Margenau H (1951) Einstein’s concept of reality”. In: Shilpp PA (ed) Albert Einstein, philosopher-scientist. Tudor Publishing Co, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Maturana HR, Varela FJ (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition: the realization of the living. Reider, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McCulloch WS (1970) Embodiments of mind. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Palan R (2000) New trends in global political economy. In: Palan R (ed) Global political economy, contemporary theories. Routledge, London, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  28. Popper K (1987) “Natural selection and the emergence of mind”. In: Radnitzky G, Bartley WW III (eds) Evolutionary epistemology, rationality, and the sociology of knowledge. Open Court, La Salle, pp 139–155Google Scholar
  29. Resnick SA, Wolff RD (1987) Knowledge and class, a marxian critique of political economy. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  30. Ruggie JG (2002) “Epistemology, ontology, and the study of international regimes”, in his constructing the world polity. Routledge, London, pp 85–101Google Scholar
  31. Russell B (2001) The problems of philosophy. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Simon HA (1957) Models of man. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Simon HA (1960) Reprinted (1987) “Decision making and organizational design”. In: Pugh DS (ed) Organizational theory. Penguin Books, Hammondsworth, pp 202–222Google Scholar
  34. Thayer-Bacon BJ (2003) Relational “(e)pistemologies”. Peter Lang, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Xuemoue W, Dinghe G (1999) “Pansystemic cybernetics: framework, methodology and development”, Kybernetes. Int J Syst Cybern 28(6/7):679–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yolles M (1998) “A cybernetic exploration of methodological complementarism”, Kybernetes. Int J Syst Cybern 27(4 & 5):527–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masudul Alam Choudhury
    • 1
  • Mohammad Shahadat Hossain
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Commerce and EconomicsSultan Qaboos UniversityMuscatSultanate of Oman
  2. 2.Chittagong UniversityChittagongBangladesh

Personalised recommendations