Advertisement

Tree Genetics & Genomes

, 13:120 | Cite as

Comparative analysis of complete chloroplast genome sequences of two subtropical trees, Phoebe sheareri and Phoebe omeiensis (Lauraceae)

Original Article
  • 448 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Taxonomy

Abstract

Phoebe is an economically important genus from the family Lauraceae. It is widely distributed in tropical and subtropical Asia, but systematics of the genus is unclear, and currently there is no species-level phylogeny. Here, we determined the complete chloroplast genome sequences of two species with long-range PCR and next genome sequencing technologies, and identified mutation sites and highly variable regions. These highly variable sites were used to reconstruct the phylogeny. The plastomes of Phoebe sheareri and P. omeiensis were 152, 876, and 152, 855 bp, respectively. Comparative genomic analysis indicated that there are 222 mutation sites including 146 substitutions, 73 indels, and 3 microinversions in both plastomes. Fifty-six single-nucleotide changes were identified in gene-coding regions, and 45 microsatellite sites were found for use in species identification. Fourteen divergence hotspots of 38 variable regions were located. Phylogeny was reconstructed using a Bayesian and maximum likelihood approach for 12 Phoebe species and other five related Lauraceae based on 15 of the highly variable regions including accD-psaI, atpB-rbcL, ndhC-trnV, ndhF-rpl32, petA-psbJ, psaA, psbA-trnH, rbcL, rps8-rpl14, rps16-trnQ, rpl32-trnL, trnC-petN, trnL-trnF, trnS-trnG, and ycf1 indicated that variability in the chloroplast regions proposed as variable is enough to detect divergence events among 12 taxa of Phoebe, and that maybe also useful to help to elucidate further relationships among other taxa of the genus.

Keywords

Phoebe Lauraceae Chloroplast Genome Phylogenetic relationship 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Jing Yang, Juan-hong Zhang, Chun-yan Lin, and Ji-xiong Yang at Germplasm Bank of Wild Species of Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy Sciences, for sequencing technology. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31600531), the CAS “Light of West China” Program, the 1000 Talents Program (WQ20110491035), the scientific research fund of Zhejiang A&F University (2014FR007), and the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LQ15C020002). We sincerely thank five anonymous referees and Dr. Giovanni Vendramin for their critical and invaluable comments that greatly improved our manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Data archiving statement

The complete chloroplast genome sequence data of Phoebe sheareri and Phoebe omeiensis and the Sanger sequence data of accD-psaI, atpB-rbcL, ndhC-trnV, ndhF-rpl32, petA-psbJ, psaA, psbA-trnH, rbcL, rps8-rpl14, rps16-trnQ, rpl32-trnL, trnC-petN, trnL-trnF, trnS-trnG, and ycf1 of 12 Phoebe species will be submitted to GenBank of NCBI through the revision process. All of the accession numbers from NCBI must be supplied prior to final acceptance of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Supplementary material

11295_2017_1196_MOESM1_ESM.docx (10.9 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 11142 kb)
11295_2017_1196_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (13 kb)
Supplementary Table S1 (XLSX 12 kb)
11295_2017_1196_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (14 kb)
Supplementary Table S2 (XLSX 14 kb)
11295_2017_1196_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx (11 kb)
Supplementary Table S3 (XLSX 11 kb)
11295_2017_1196_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx (55 kb)
Supplementary Table S4 (XLSX 55 kb)

References

  1. CBOL Plant Working Group A DNA barcode for land plants (2009) Proc. Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(31):12794–12797.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905845106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bausher MG, Singh ND, Lee SB, Jansen RK, Daniell H (2006) The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck var ‘Ridge Pineapple’: organization and phylogenetic relationships to other angiosperms. BMC Plant Biol 6:21CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Chanderbali AS, van der Werff H, Renner SS (2001) Phylogeny and historical biogeography of Lauraceae: evidence from the chloroplast and nuclear genomes. Ann Mo Bot Gard 88(1):104–134.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2666133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D (2012) jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods 9(8):772–772CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Dong W, Liu J, Yu J, Wang L, Zhou S (2012) Highly variable chloroplast markers for evaluating plant phylogeny at low taxonomic levels and for DNA barcoding. PLOS ONE 7: e35071Google Scholar
  6. Doyle JJ, Dickson EE (1987) Preservation of Plant-Samples for DNA Restriction Endonuclease Analysis. Taxon 36 (4):715-722. doi: https://10.2307/1221122
  7. Gargano D, Scotti N, Vezzi A, Bilardi A, Valle G, Grillo S, Cozzolino S, Cardi T (2012) Genome-wide analysis of plastome sequence variation and development of plastidial CAPS markers in common potato and related Solanum species. Genet Resour Crop Evol 59(3):419–430.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-011-9692-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goremykin V, Hirsch-Ernst K, W lfl S, Hellwig F (2003) The chloroplast genome of the “basal” angiosperm Calycanthus fertilis—structural and phylogenetic analyses. Plant Syst Evol 242(1):119–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang JF, Li L, van der Werff H, Li HW, Rohwer JG, Crayn DM, Meng HH, van der Merwe M, Conran JG, Li J (2016) Origins and evolution of cinnamon and camphor: A phylogenetic and historical biogeographical analysis of the Cinnamomum group (Lauraceae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 96:33–44Google Scholar
  10. Illumina HiSeq (2000) https://www.illumina.com/
  11. Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30(4):772–780.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Li L, Li J, Rohwer JG, van der Werff H, Wang ZH, Li HW (2011) Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Persea group (Lauraceae) and its biogeographic implications on the evolution of tropical and subtropical amphi-Pacific disjunctions. Am J Bot 98(9):1520–1536.  https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1100006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Librado P, Rozas J (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25(11):1451–1452.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lohse M, Drechsel O, Kahlau S, Bock R (2013) OrganellarGenomeDRAW—a suite of tools for generating physical maps of plastid and mitochondrial genomes and visualizing expression data sets. Nucleic Acids Res 41(Web Server issue):W575–W581.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt289 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Ma PF, Zhang YX, Zeng CX, Guo ZH, Li DZ (2014) Chloroplast phylogenomic analyses resolve deep-level relationships of an intractable bamboo tribe Arundinarieae (Poaceae). Syst Biol 63(6):933–950.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syu054 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Miao RH (1993) New species from Chinese flora. Acta Sci Nat Univ Sunyatseni 132:56–68Google Scholar
  17. Patel RK, Jain M (2012) NGS QC Toolkit: a toolkit for quality control of next generation sequencing data. PLoS One 7(2):e30619.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030619 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Prince LM (2015) Plastid primers for angiosperm phylogenetics and phylogeography. Appl Plant Sci 3(6).  https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1400085
  19. Redwan RM, Saidin A, Kumar SV (2015) Complete chloroplast genome sequence of MD-2 pineapple and its comparative analysis among nine other plants from the subclass Commelinidae. BMC Plant Biol 15:196.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-015-0587-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Rohwer JG (2000) Toward a phylogenetic classification of the Lauraceae: evidence from matK sequences. Syst Bot 25(1):60–71.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2666673 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rohwer JG, Li J, Rudolph B, Schmidt SA, van der Werff H, Li HW (2009) Is Persea (Lauraceae) monophyletic? Evidence from nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences. Taxon 58(4):1153–1167Google Scholar
  22. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19(12):1572–1574.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Semwal DK, Semwal RB (2013) Ethnobotany, pharmacology and phytochemistry of the genus Phoebe (Lauraceae). Mini-Rev Organic Chem 10(1):12–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Song Y, Dong WP, Liu B, Xu C, Yao X, Gao J, Corlett RT (2015) Comparative analysis of complete chloroplast genome sequences of two tropical trees Machilus yunnanensis and Machilus balansae in the family Lauraceae. Front Plant Sci 6.  https://doi.org/10.3389/Fpls.2015.00662
  25. Song Y, Yao X, Tan YH, Gan Y, Corlett RT (2016) Complete chloroplast genome sequence of the avocado: gene organization, comparative analysis, and phylogenetic relationships with other Lauraceae. Can J For Res 46(11):1293–1301.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2016-0199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Song Y, Yu WB, Tan YH, Liu B, Yao X, Jin JJ, Padmanaba M, Yang JB, Corlett RT (2016) Evolutionary comparisons of the chloroplast genome in Lauraceae and insights into loss events in the Magnoliids. Genome Biol Evol 9 (9):2354-2364. doi: https://10.1093/gbe/evx180
  27. Stamatakis A (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30(9):1312–1313.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Wei FN, Werff HVD (2008) Flora of China, in Dipterocarpaceae, Vol. 13, eds Z. Y. Wu, P. H. Raven, and D. Y. Hong (St. Louis, MO: Science Press, Beijing, and Missouri Botanical Garden Press), 201–224Google Scholar
  29. Wu CC, Chu FH, Ho CK, Sung CH, Chang SH (2017) Comparative analysis of the complete chloroplast genomic sequence and chemical components of Cinnamomum micranthum and Cinnamomum kanehirae. Holzforschung 71:189–197Google Scholar
  30. Wyman SK, Jansen RK, Boore JL (2004) Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics 20(17):3252–3255.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth352 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Yang JB, Li DZ, Li HT (2014) Highly effective sequencing whole chloroplast genomes of angiosperms by nine novel universal primer pairs. Mol Ecol Resour 14 (5):1024-1031. doi: https://10.1111/1755-0998.12251

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical GardenChinese Academy of SciencesMenglaChina
  2. 2.Southeast Asia Biodiversity Research InstituteChinese Academy of ScienceNay Pyi TawMyanmar
  3. 3.School of Agriculture and Food ScienceZhejiang A & F UniversityHangzhouChina
  4. 4.Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of BotanyChinese Academy of SciencesKunmingChina

Personalised recommendations