Tree Genetics & Genomes

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 107–116 | Cite as

Comparative chloroplast and nuclear DNA analysis of Castanea species in the southern region of the USA

Original Paper


Boundaries between American Castanea species (Castanea dentata, the American chestnut and C. pumila var. pumila, the Allegheny chinkapin, and var. ozarkensis, the Ozark chinkapin) have been difficult to establish because of intraspecific variation, interspecific similarities and the incidence of chestnut blight, which has prevented trees from maturing. In this study, informative chloroplast (cp) DNA and nuclear sequences from Castanea taxa were analyzed to gain a better understanding of their phylogeography in North America. Our emphasis has been on the most southern Castanea population in the Appalachian region, known for its morphological diversity. This Ruffner Mountain (Alabama) population shows a high number of unique haplotypes, which can be divided into two main groups. One group shares homology with the widespread and evolutionarily recent C. dentata haplotype. The other group shares homology with American chestnuts and Allegheny chinkapin taxa from southern states. This group has been the result of recent and more ancient cp capture and hybridization, indicative of hybrid zone clustering and glacial refugial origin. The range of C. pumila must have been more extensive along the Coastal Plains region, since only a few mutations separate the Ozark chinkapin from the main Allegheny chinkapin haplotype. The geographic origin of the American Castanea species complex appears to be in the Gulf Coast region.


Castanea dentata Castanea pumila Chestnut Allegheny chinkapin Ozark chinkapin cpDNA Nuclear SNPs Hybridization 


  1. Amato ML, Brooks RJ, FU J (2008) A phylogeographic analysis of populations of wood turtle (Glyptemys insculpta) throughout its range. Mol Ecol 17:570–581PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ames M, Salas A, Spooner DM (2007) The discovery and phylogenetic implications of a novel 41 bp plastic DNA detection in wild potatoes. Plant Syst Evol 268:159–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anagnostakis SA (1987) Chestnut blight: the classical problem of an introduced pathogen. Mycologia 79:23–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avise JC (2004) Molecular markers, natural history and evolution. Sinauer Ass Inc, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  5. Binkley M (2008). Phylogeography of Northeast America Castanea. MS Thesis. University of Tennessee at ChattanoogaGoogle Scholar
  6. Burnham CR (1988) The restoration of the American chestnut. Am Sci 76:478–487Google Scholar
  7. Casasoli M, Deroy J, Morera-Dutry C, Brendel O, Porth I, Guehl JM, Villani F, Kremer A (2006) Comparison of quantitative trait loci for adaptive traits between oak and chestnut based on an expressed sequence tag consensus map. Genetics 105:533–546Google Scholar
  8. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9:1657–1659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dane F (2009) Comparative phylogeography of Castanea species. Proceeding of the Fourth International Chestnut Symposium. Acta Horticult 844:211–222Google Scholar
  10. Dane F, Lang P (2008) Biodiversity and evolution of Castanea. In: Sharma AK, Sharma A (eds) In: Plant Genome Biodiversity and Evolution. Phanerograms (gymnosperm) and (angiosperm-monocotyledons). Science Publishers, NH, pp 79–100, Chapter 4Google Scholar
  11. Davis MB (1983) Quaternary history of deciduous forests of eastern North American and Europe. Annals Missouri Bot Garden 70:550–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Delcourt HR (2002) Forests in peril. Tracking deciduous trees from ice age refuges into the greenhouse world. McDonald and Woodward, VAGoogle Scholar
  13. Eidesen PB, Alsos IG, Popp M, Stensrud O, Suda J, Brochmann C (2007) Nuclear vs. plastid data: complex Pleistocene history of a circumpolar key species. Mol Ecol 16:3902–3925PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Griffin G (2008) Recent advances in research and management of chestnut blight on American chestnut. Phytopathology 98:S7–S7Google Scholar
  15. Griffin SR, Barrett SCH (2004) Post-glacial history of Trillium grandiflorum (Melanthiaceae) in eastern North America: inferences from phylogeography. Am J Bot 90:465–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guicking D, Fiala B, Blattner FR, Slik F, Mohamed M, Weising K (2011) Comparative chloroplast phylogeography of two tropical pioneer trees, Macaranga gigantae and Macaranga pearsonii (Euphorbiaceae). Tree Gen Genomes 7:573–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heinze B (2002) Chloroplast DNA primers.
  18. Hewitt GM (2000) The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature 405:907–913PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang H, Carey WA, Dane F, Norton JD (1996) Evaluation of Chinese chestnut cultivars for resistance to Cryphonectria parasitica. Plant Dis 80:45–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jakob SS, Blattner FR (2006) A chloroplast genealogy of Hordeum (Poaceae): long-term persisting haplotypes, incomplete lineage sorting, regional extinction and the consequences for phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol 23:1601–1612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jaynes R (1975) Chestnut. In: Moore J (ed) Advances in fruit breeding, 490-503. Purdue University Press, INGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson GP (1988) Revision of Castanea sect. Balanocastanon (Fagaceae). J Arnold Arboretum 69:25–49Google Scholar
  23. Kubisiak TL, Roberds JH (2003) Genetic variation in natural populations of American chestnut. J. American Chestnut Foundation. Science and natural history XVI: 43-48Google Scholar
  24. Kubisiak TL, Roberds JH (2006) Genetic structure of American chestnut populations based on neutral DNA markers. Proceeding of conference and workshop: Restoration of American chestnut to forest lands, Steiner KC and Carlson JE (Eds), National Park Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  25. Kubisiak TL, Hebard FV, Nelson CD, Zhang J, Bernatzky R, Huang H, Anagnostakis SL, Doudrick RL (1997) Molecular mapping of resistance to blight in an interspecific cross in the genus Castanea. Phytopathology 87:751–759PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lang P, Dane F, Kubisiak TL (2006) Phylogeny of Castanea (Fagaceae) based on chloroplast trnT-L sequence data. Tree Gen Genomes 2:132–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lang P, Dane F, Kubisiak TL, Huang HW (2007) Molecular evidence for an Asian origin and a unique westward migration of species in the genus Castanea via Europe to North America. Mol Phylogen Evol 43:49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Milgroom MG, Wang K, Zhou Y, Lapari SE, Kanko S (1996) Intercontinental population structure of the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica. Mycologia 88:179–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morris AB, Ickert-Bond SM, Brunson DB, Soltis DE, Soltis PS (2008) Phylogeographical structure and temporal complexity in American sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua; Altingiaceae). Mol Ecol 17:3889–3900PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Muir G, Lowe AJ, Fleming CC, Vogl C (2004) High nuclear genetic diversity, high levels of outcrossing and low differentiation among remnant populations of Quercus petraea at the margin of its range in Ireland. Annals Bot 93:691–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Paillet FL (1993) Growth form and life-histories of American chestnut and Allegheny and Ozark chinquapin at various North-American sites. Bull Torrey Bot Club 120:257–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Payne J, Miller G, Johnson GP, Senter SD (1994) Castanea pumila (L) Mill: an underused native nut tree. HortSci 29:62–131Google Scholar
  33. Petit RJ, Aguinagalde I, de Beaulieu JL, Bittkau C, Brewer S, Cheddadi R, Ennos R, Fineschi S, Grivet D, Lascoux M, Mohanty A, Muller-Starck G, Demesure-Musch B, Palme A, Martin JP, Rendell S, Vendramin GG (2003) Glacial refugia: hotspots but not melting pots of genetic diversity. Science 300:1563–1565PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Posada D, Crandall KA (2001) Intraspecific gene genealogies trees grafting into networks. Trends Ecol Evol 16:37–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rissler LJ, Smith WH (2010) Mapping amphibian contact zones and phylogeographical break hotspots across the United States. Mol Ecol 19:5404–5416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rutter PA, Miller G, Payne JA (1991) Chestnuts (Castanea). Genetic resources of temperate fruit and nut crops. Acta Horticult 90:761–788Google Scholar
  37. Schafleitner R, Wilhelm E (2002) Isolation of would-responsive genes from chestnut (Castanea sativa) microstems by mRNA display and their differential expression upon wounding and infection with the chestnut blight fungus (Cryphonectria parasitica). Mol Plant Path 61:339–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shaw J, Lickey EB, Schilling EE, Small RL (2007) Comparison of whole chloroplast genome sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in angiosperms: the tortoise and the hare III. Am J Bot 94:275–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Simmons MP, Ochotreana H (2000) Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst Biol 49:369–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Soltis PS, Soltis DE (2009) The role of hybridization in plant speciation. Annu Rev Plant Biol 60:561–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Soltis DE, Morris AB, McLachlan JS, Manos PS, Soltis PS (2006) Comparative phylogeography of unglaciated eastern North American. Mol Ecol 15:4261–4293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Soltis DE, Moore MJ, Burleigh G, Soltis PS (2009) Molecular markers and concepts of plant evolutionary relationships: progress, promise and future prospects. Critical Rev Plant Sci 28:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stillwell KL, Wilbure HM, Werth CR, Taylor DR (2003) Heterozygote advantage in the American chestnut, Castanea dentata (Fagaceae). Am J Bot 90:207–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Swenson NG, Howard DJ (2005) Clustering of contact zones, hybrid zones and phylogeogprahic breaks in North America. Amer Nat 166:581–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Swofford DL ( 2000). PAUP. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Version 4. Sinauer, MAGoogle Scholar
  46. Taberlet P, Gielly L, Pautou G, Bouvet J (1991) Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol Biol 17:1105–1109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Watts WA, Hansen BCS (1994) Pre-Holocene and Holocene pollen records of vegetation history from the Florida peninsula and their climatic implications. Pleogeogr Paleoclimatol Paleoecol 109:163–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of HorticultureAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA

Personalised recommendations