Tree Genetics & Genomes

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 166–173 | Cite as

Genes induced by WDS are differentially expressed in two populations of aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis)

  • Pratheesh Sathyan
  • Ronald J. Newton
  • Carol A. Loopstra
Original Paper


Gene expression in response to water-deficit stress (WDS) is a critical factor determining the survival and growth of pine seedlings. To understand how gene expression varies with different water stress levels, we differentially screened a cDNA library from roots of aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis) seedlings subjected to WDS. We found 156 clones of genes up-regulated and 56 down-regulated in response to WDS. Of the 14 clones selected for further characterization, 8 resemble WDS-responsive genes previously identified in angiosperms. The genes showing similarities to known proteins included an aldehyde dehydrogenase, a late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) protein, a chitinase, a cyclophilin, an MYB factor, an inorganic pyrophosphatase, a sucrose synthase, and a 4-coumarate ligase. Six of the clones did not have any similarity to previously identified proteins of known function. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to compare the differential expression of these genes during control (no stress), moderate, and severe WDS treatments of seedling progeny from two different geographic origins within Israel, Yirka, and Beit Jann. The difference in expression between the treatments for various genes ranged from 1.9 to 8.0 cycle threshold. Most of the genes were expressed at similar levels in trees from the two populations or at higher levels in trees from Beit Jann, Israel. Northern blot analyses done for four highly expressed genes verify the results of the qPCR.


Aleppo pine Drought Gene expression LEA qPCR Water-deficit stress 


  1. 1.
    Abe H, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Urao T, Iwasaki T, Hosokawa D, Shinozaki K (1997) Role of Arabidopsis MYC and MYB homologs in drought- and abscisic acid-regulated gene expression. Plant Cell 9:1859–1868PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abe H, Urao T, Ito T, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2003) Arabidopsis AtMYC2 (bHLH) and AtMYB2 (MYB) function as transcriptional activators in abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell 15:63–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bateman A, Coin L, Durbin R, Finn RD, Hollich V, Griffiths-Jones S, Khanna A, Marshall M, Moxon S, Sonnhammer ELL, Studholme DJ, Yeats C, Sean R (2004) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 32:D138–D141 ( Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bray EA (1997) Plant response to water deficit. Trends Plant Sci 2:48–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bustin SA (2000) Absolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription PCR assays. J Mol Endocrinol 25:169–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chang S, Puryear J, Cairney J (1993) A simple and efficient method for isolating RNA from pine trees. Plant Mol Biol Rep 11:114–117Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chang S, Puryear J, Dias MADL, Funkhouser EA, Newton RJ, Cairney J (1996a) Cloning of a cDNA for a chitinase homologue which lacks chitin-binding sites and is down-regulated by water stress and wounding. Plant Mol Biol 31:693–699PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chang S, Puryear JD, Dias MADL, Funkhouser EA, Newton RJ, Cairney J (1996b) Gene expression under water deficit in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda): isolation and characterization of cDNA clones. Physiol Plant 97:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Close TJ (1996) Dehydrins: emergence of a biochemical role of a family of plant dehydration proteins. Physiol Plant 97:795–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Claros MG, Vincens P (1996) Computational method to predict mitochondrially imported proteins and their targeting sequences. Eur J Biochem 241:770–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Costa P, Bahrman N, Frigerio JM, Kremer A, Plomion C (1998) Water-deficit-responsive proteins in maritime pine. Plant Mol Biol 38:587–596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dejardin A, Sokolov LN, Kleczkowki LA (1999) Sugar/osmoticum level modulate differential abscisic acid-independent expression of two stress-responsive sucrose synthase genes in Arabidopsis. Biochem J 344:503–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Delmer DP, Amor Y (1995) Cellulose biosynthesis. Plant Cell 7:987–1000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dong JZ, Dunstan DI (1997) Characterization of cDNAs representing five abscisic acid-responsive genes associated with somatic embryogenesis in Picea glauca, and their responses to abscisic acid stereostructure. Planta 203:448–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dubos C, Plomion C (2003) Identification of water deficit responsive genes in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) roots. Plant Mol Biol 51:249–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dubos C, Provost GL, Pot D, Salin F, Lalane C, Madu D, Frigerio JM, Plomion C (2003) Identification and characterization of water-stress-responsive genes in hydroponically grown maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) seedlings. Tree Physiol 23:169–179PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Geingenberger P, Hajirezaei M, Geiger M, Dieting U, Sonnewald U, Stitt M (1998) Overexpression of pyrophosphatase leads to increased sucrose degradation and starch synthesis, increased activities of enzyme for sucrose–starch interconversions, and increased levels of nucleotides in growing potato tubers. Planta 205:428–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gething MJ, Sambrook J (1992) Protein folding in the cell. Nature 355:33–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grunwald C, Schiller G, Conkle MT (1986) Isozyme variation among natural stands and plantations of aleppo pine in Israel. J Bot 35:161–174Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ingram J, Bartels D (1996) The molecular basis of dehydration tolerance in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 47:377–403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jin H, Martin C (1999) Multifunctionality and diversity within the plant MYB-gene family. Plant Mol Biol 41:577–585PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kirch HH, Nair A, Bartels D (2001) Novel ABA- and dehydration-inducible aldehyde dehydrogenase genes isolated from the resurrection plant Craterostigma plantagineum and Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 28:555–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kleines M, Elster R-C, Rodrigo M-J, Blervacq A-S, Salamini F, Bartels D (1999) Isolation and expression analysis of two stress-responsive sucrose-synthase genes from resurrection plant Craterostigma plantagineum (Hochst). Planta 209:13–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Leone A, Costa A, Tucci M, Grillo S (1994) Comparative analysis of short- and long-term changes in gene expression caused by low water potential in potato (Solanum tuberosum) cell suspension cultures. Plant Physiol 106:703–712PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Loopstra CA, Sederoff RR (1995) Xylem-specific gene expression in loblolly pine. Plant Mol Biol 27:277–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Luan S, Lane WS, Schreiber SL (1994a) cypB: a chloroplast-localized heat shock-responsive cyclophilin from fava bean. Plant Cell 6:885–892PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Luan S, Albers MW, Schreiber SL (1994b) Light-regulated tissue-specific immunophilins in a higher plant. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:984–988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Meier CE, Newton RJ, Puryear JD, Sen S (1992) Physiological responses of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) seedlings to drought stress: osmotic adjustment and tissue elasticity. J Plant Physiol 140:754–760Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nakai K, Horton P (1999) PSORT: a program for detecting the sorting signals of proteins and predicting their subcellular localization. Trends Biochem Sci 24:34–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Newton RJ, Funkhouser EA, Fong F, Tauer CG (1991) Molecular and physiological genetics of drought tolerance in forest species. For Ecol Manag 43:225–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nguyen-Queyrens A, Bouchet-Lannat F (1989) Variation in growth and osmotic regulation of roots of water-stressed maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait) provenaces. Tree Physiol 5:123–133Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nguyen-Queyrens A, Bouchet-Lannat F (2003) Osmotic adjustment in three-year-old seedlings of five provenances of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) in response to drought. Tree Physiol 23:397–404PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nicholas Karl B, Nicholas Hugh B Jr (1997) GeneDoc: a tool for editing and annotating multiple sequence alignments.
  34. 34.
    Pelah D, Wang W, Altman A, Shoseyov O, Bartels D (1997) Differential accumulation of water stress-related proteins, sucrose synthase and soluble sugars in Populus species that differ in their water stress response. Physiol Plant 99:153–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Perozich J, Nicholas H, Lindahl R, Hempel J (1999) The big book of aldehyde dehydrogenase sequences: an overview of the extended family. In: Weiner H et al (eds) Advances in experimental medicine and biology, vol 463. Kluwer Academic Publisher/Plenum, New York, USA, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Raikhel NV, Lee H-I, Broekaert WF (1993) Structure and function of chitin binding proteins. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 44:591–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Riechmann JL, Heard J, Martin G, Reuber L, Jiang CZ, Keddie J, Adam L, Pineda O, Ratcliffe OJ, Samaha RR, Creelman R, Pilgrim M, Broun P, Zhang JZ, Ghandehari D, Sherman BK, Yu GL (2000) Arabidopsis transcription factors: genome-wide comparative analysis among eukaryotes. Science 290:2105–2110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatus T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NYGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schiller G, Waisel Y (1989) Among-provenance variation in Pinus halepensis in Israel. For Ecol Manag 28:141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schiller G, Conkle MT, Grunwald C (1986) Local differentiation among Mediterranean populations of aleppo pine in their isoenzymes. Silvae Genet 35:1–8Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Scholander PF, Hemmingsen E, Garey W (1965) Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science 148:339–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (1997) Gene expression and signal transduction in water-stress response. Plant Physiol 115:327–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Urao T, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Urao S, Shinozaki K (1993) An Arabidopsis myb Homolog is induced by dehydration stress and its gene product binds to the conserved MYB recognition sequence. Plant Cell 5:1529–1539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    van Buijtenen JP, Bilan MV, Zimmerman RH (1976) Morphological characteristics related to drought resistance in Pinus taeda. In: Cannel MGR, Last FT (eds) Tree physiology and yield improvement. Academic Press, New York, pp 349–359Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Voo KS, Whetten RW, O’Malley DM, Sederoff RR (1995) 4-Coumarate:coenyme A ligase from loblolly pine xylem: isolation, characterization and complementary DNA cloning. Plant Physiol 108:85–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wakamiya I, Price HJ, Messina MG, Newton RJ (1996) Pine genome size and diversity and water relations. Physiol Plant 96:13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Whetten R, Sun YH, Zhang Y, Sederoff RR (2001) Functional genomics and cell wall biosynthesis in loblolly pine. Plant Mol Biol 47:275–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Williston HL (1972) The question of adequate stocking. Tree Plant Notes 23:2Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wise MJ (2003) LEAping to conclusions: a computational reanalysis of late embryogenesis abundant protein and their possible roles. BMC Bioinformatics 4:52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Xu DP, Sung SJS, Loboda T, Kormanik PP, Black CC (1989) Characterization of sucrolysis via the uridine diphosphate and pyrophosphate-dependent sucrose synthase pathway. Plant Physiol 90:635–642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zahner R, Donnelly JR (1967) Refining correlations of rainfall and radial growth in young red pine. Ecology 48:525–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Zhang XH, Chiang VL (1997) Molecular cloning of 4-coumarate: coenzyme A ligase in loblolly pine and the roles of this enzyme in the biosynthesis of lignin in compression wood. Plant Physiol 113:65–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pratheesh Sathyan
    • 1
  • Ronald J. Newton
    • 2
  • Carol A. Loopstra
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forest Science, Institute for Plant Genomics and Biotechnology, and Molecular and Environmental Plant SciencesTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyEast Carolina State UniversityGreenvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations