Skip to main content
Log in

Do Morning Classes Improve Student Learning of Microeconomics Principles?

  • Published:
International Advances in Economic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article analyzes the impact of class time on students’ grades by using data from Middle Tennessee State University. The data cover a period of six years and are based on a sample of 5803 individuals who enrolled in 133 sections of principles of microeconomics. To identify the causal impact of class time on students’ grades, I used a bootstrapping method which allowed assigning measures of accuracy to sample estimates. For males, the estimated coefficients were negative and statistically significant at the 10% level, and the coefficients suggested that a male student in an afternoon class could expect to earn a letter grade that is 0.029 points lower than he would have earned by taking the class in the morning. For females, the estimated coefficients were not statistically significant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adan, A., & Natale, V. (2002). Gender differences in morningness–eveningness preference. Chronobiology International, 19(4), 709–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. L. (2008). Multiple inference and gender differences in the effects of early intervention: A reevaluation of the abecedarian, Perry preschool, and early training projects. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(484), 1481–1495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arulampalam, W., Naylor, R. A., & Smith, J. (2012). Am I missing something? The effects of absence from class on student performance. Economics of Education Review, 31(4), 363–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beşoluk, Ş., Önder, İ., & Deveci, İ. (2011). Morningness-eveningness preferences and academic achievement of university students. Chronobiology International, 28(2), 118–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borisenkov, M. F., Perminova, E. V., & Kosova, A. L. (2010). Chronotype, sleep length, and school achievement of 11-to 23-year-old students in northern European Russia. Chronobiology International, 27(6), 1259–1270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brasfield, D., McCoy, J., & Milkman, M. (1992). The effect of university math on student performance in principles of economics. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 25(4), 240–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, S. V., & Heckman, J. J. (1993). The nonequivalence of high school equivalents. Journal of Labor Economics, 11(1, Part 1), 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrell, S. E., Maghakian, T., & West, J. E. (2011). A's from Zzzz's? The causal effect of school start time on the academic achievement of adolescents. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3(3), 62–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, C., Mustard, D. B., & Van Parys, J. (2013). Noncognitive skills and the gender disparities in test scores and teacher assessments: Evidence from primary school. Journal of Human Resources, 48(1), 236–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortes, K. E., Bricker, J., & Rohlfs, C. (2012). The role of specific subjects in education production functions: Evidence from morning classes in Chicago public high schools. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 12(1).

  • Currie, J., and Thomas, D. (1999). Early test scores, socioeconomic status and future outcomes (No. w6943). National bureau of economic research.

  • Dills, A. K., & Hernandez-Julian, R. (2008). Course scheduling and academic performance. Economics of Education Review, 27(6), 646–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, F. (2012). Early to rise? The effect of daily start times on academic performance. Economics of Education Review, 31(6), 970–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, R. G., & Levitt, S. D. (2010). An empirical analysis of the gender gap in mathematics. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(2), 210–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, C., Katz, L. F., & Kuziemko, I. (2006). The homecoming of American college women: The reversal of the college gender gap. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(4), 133–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Julián, R. (2010). Merit-based scholarships and student effort. Education, 5(1), 14–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmlund, H., & Sund, K. (2008). Is the gender gap in school performance affected by the sex of the teacher? Labour Economics, 15(1), 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husain, M., & Millimet, D. L. (2009). The mythical ‘boy crisis’? Economics of Education Review, 28(1), 38–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jameson Boex, L. (2000). Attributes of effective economics instructors: An analysis of student evaluations. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(3), 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokkelenberg, E. C., Dillon, M., & Christy, S. M. (2008). The effects of class size on student grades at a public university. Economics of Education Review, 27(2), 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavy, V., & Schlosser, A. (2011). Mechanisms and impacts of gender peer effects at school. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(2), 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden, K. G., & Scott, A. (1987). The economics student reexamined: Male-female differences in comprehension. The Journal of Economic Education, 18(4), 365–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murnane, R. J., Willett, J. B., & Levy, F. (1995). The growing importance of cognitive skills in wage determination (No. w5076). National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students (Vol. 2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekkarinen, T. (2012). Gender differences in education. Nordic economic. Policy Review, 1, 165–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, N. G. (2016). How the time of day affects productivity: Evidence from school schedules. Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raimondo, H. J., Esposito, L., & Gershenberg, I. (1990). Introductory class size and student performance in intermediate theory courses. The Journal of Economic Education, 21(4), 369–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roenneberg, T., Wirz-Justice, A., & Merrow, M. (2003). Life between clocks: Daily temporal patterns of human chronotypes. Journal of Biological Rhythms, 18(1), 80–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegfried, J. J., & Fels, R. (1979). Research on teaching college economics: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 17(3), 923–969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tay, R. S. (1994). Students' performance in economics: Does the norm hold across cultural and institutional settings? The Journal of Economic Education, 25(4), 291–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahistrom, K. (2002). Changing times: Findings from the first longitudinal study of later high school start times. NASSP Bulletin, 86(633), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. D., Cook, P. F., Quinn, B., & Jensen, R. P. (1985). University class size: Is smaller better? Research in Higher Education, 23(3), 307–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Chris Klein, and Tony Eff for helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Ibrahim Aldaghir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aldaghir, M.I. Do Morning Classes Improve Student Learning of Microeconomics Principles?. Int Adv Econ Res 24, 163–177 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-018-9680-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-018-9680-1

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation