Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

U.S. Universal Health Coverage at a Crossroad

  • Published:
International Advances in Economic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scheduled for 2014, implementation of universal coverage in the U.S. is not proceeding smoothly. Embroiled in bitter partisan conflict and absent decisive popular support, this costly new entitlement program, The Affordable Care Act commonly referred to as ObamaCare, is vulnerable to a major overhaul or possible rejection. National interest considerations urge that reformulation center on better matching the law’s aspirations with new realities rather than abstract ideals. Constraints on government spending and the risks public indebtedness pose for the national economy compel a pragmatic reassessment of entitlement policy in the light of what is affordable. ObamaCare compounds the government’s unsustainable debt and deficit problem, promising benefits that are overly generous and lack effective cost controls. Fiscal imperatives compel that scarce government resources be targeted on the truly needy and that individuals capable of doing so assume a greater responsibility for their health care. They also necessitate a more sophisticated public-private partnership than provided in the new health law in order to capture the benefits of market competition that facilitate innovation, circumvent political stalemate, confine the inflationary effects of services perceived to be free goods, and provide incentives that reward individuals for becoming more cost-conscious users of health services. Finally, the harnessing of self-interest is presented as a superior alternative to centralized command and control methods for influencing health behavior and keeping health spending under control. In the interest of economy and efficiency, government involvement, following the subsidization of low income persons on a sliding scale basis, should concentrate on standard setting, monitoring and evaluating productivity and quality improvement practices. Ultimately, living standards contribute more to health status than do health services, and this requires investment directed at economic growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Battistella, R. M. (2010a). Health care turning point: Why single payer won’t work. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battistella, R. M. (2010b). ObamaCare: miscalculated assurances. The Cancer Journal, 16(6), 622–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congressional Budget Office (2012). Budget Infographic – Discretionary, April 17. http://www.cbo.gov/publication/43155. Accessed 26 June 2013.

  • Cox, C. & Archer, B (2012). Why $16 trillion only hints at the true U.S. debt, The Wall Street Journal, Nov. 26. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323353204578127374039087636.html. Accessed 19 June 2013.

  • Danaei, G., et al. (2011). The preventable causes of death in the United States: Comparative risk assessment of dietary, lifestyle, and metabolic risk factors. Public Library of Science—Medicine, 6(1). htpp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19399161?dopt==Abstract. Accessed 19 June 2013.

  • U.S. Government Accountability Office (2011). Budget and federal debt: How do trust fund surpluses or deficits affect debt? http://www.gao.gov/special.pubs/longterm/debt/budgetdebt.html. Accessed 19 June 2013.

  • Kaplan, R (2013). Older americans, medicare, and the affordable care act: what’s really in it for elders? Generations: Journal of the American Society on Aging, 37(1). http://www.asaging.org/blog/kaplan-older-americans-medicare. Accessed 19 June 2013.

  • Kuhnle, S. (Ed.). (2000). The survival of the European welfare state. London: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltby, E. (2013). The new math for health insurance costs, The Wall Street Journal, June 7, pp. B1, 4.

  • Nelson, C. M. & Matthews, A. W. (2013). Obama pitches health law, The Wall Street Journal, June 7, pA5.

  • Newhouse, J. P. (1992). Medical care costs: how much welfare loss? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6(3), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, P. & Radnofsky, L. (2013). Poll finds support slumping for health law, The Wall Street Journal, June 6, p. A4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2009). This time is different: Eight centuries of financial folly. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivkin, D. B., Jr., & Foley, E. P. (2013). An ObamaCare board answerable to no one. The Wall Street Journal, June, 20, A21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, L. B. (2009). Preventing chronic disease: an important investment, but don’t count on cost savings. Health Affairs, 28(1), 42–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sack, K. (2010). Arizona medicaid cuts seen as a sign of the times, New York Times, Dec. 4, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/05/us/05transplant.html?_r=0. Accessed 19 June 2013.

  • Senger, A. (2013). ObamaCare at three years: Increasing cost estimate. The Heritage Network. http://blog.heritage.org/2013/03/23/obamacare-at-three-years-increasing-cost-estimates/. Accessed 19 June 2013.

  • Stockman, D. A. (2013). The great deformation: The corruption of capitalism in America. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2013). Health-Care reform: promises, promises. April 20, p. 34.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger Battistella.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Battistella, R. U.S. Universal Health Coverage at a Crossroad. Int Adv Econ Res 19, 409–423 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-013-9428-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-013-9428-x

Keywords

Navigation