Skip to main content

A Sequential Rationality Test of USDA Preliminary Price Estimates for Selected Program Crops: Rice, Soybeans, and Wheat

Abstract

Despite recurrent evaluations on USDA price forecasts, the performance of USDA price estimates has not previously been examined in publication. To fill the void in research to this important public information, a sequential forecast evaluation procedure is applied to selected USDA price estimates: Rice, soybeans, and wheat. The evaluation procedure reveals that the USDA price estimates are short-run unbiased; however, they are not long-run rational. In addition, short-run optimality and efficiency tests suggest that USDA price estimates need to be properly scaled and fully reflect information embodied in past prices and their estimates — a possible venue to improve the predictability of USDA price estimates for the crops.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. Model 1 specifies that the level data have no deterministic trends and the co-integrating equations do not have an intercept; Model 2 specifies that the level data have no deterministic trends and the co-integrating equations have an intercept; Model 3 indicates that the level data have linear trends but the co-integrating equations have only intercepts; Model 4 assumes that the level data and co-integrating equations include linear trends; lastly Model 5 assumes that the level data have quadratic trends and the co-integrating equations have linear trends.

References

  • Bailey, D., & Brorsen, W. (1998). Trends in the accuracy of USDA production forecasts for beef and pork. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 23, 515–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A., Dolado, J., Galbraith, J. W., & Hendry, D. F. (1993). Co-integration, error correction, and the econometric analysis of non-stationary data. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, Y., & Chinn, M. D. (1998). Integration, cointegration, and the forecast consistency of structural exchange rate models. Journal of International Money and Finance, 17, 813–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elam, E. W., & Holder, S. H. (1985). An evaluation of the rice outlook and situation price forecasts. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 27, 155–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, W. (2004). Applied econometric time series. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. E., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Cointegration and error-correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55, 251–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C. W. J., & Newbold, P. (1986). Forecasting economic time series (2nd ed.). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, S. (1992). Testing Structural Hypotheses in a Multivariate Cointegration Analysis of PPP and the UIP for UK. Journal of Econometrics, 53, 211–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, S. (1995). Likelihood-based inferences in cointegrated vector autoregressive models. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inferences on cointegration with application to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastens, T. L., Schroeder, T. C., & Plain, P. (1998). Evaluation of extension and USDA price and production forecasts. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 23, 244–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, A. M., Jiang, B., Djunaidi, H., Hoffman, L. A., & Wailes, E. J. (2004). Unbiasedness and market efficiency tests of the U.S. rice future market. Review of Agricultural Economics, 24, 474–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • No, S. C. (2007). Parametric and nonparametric evaluation of USDA hog price forecast. The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 10, 107–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D. (1987). Forecasting efficiency: concepts and applications. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, 667–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, A. J., & Timmermann, A. (2007). Testing forecast optimality under unknown loss. Journal of American Statistical Association, 102, 1172–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, D. R., & Manfredo, M. R. (1998). USDA production forecasts for pork, beef, and broilers: an evaluation. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 27, 114–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, D. R., & Manfredo, M. R. (2007). Rationality of U.S. department of agriculture livestock price forecasts: a unified approach. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 39, 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, M. P. & Myers, R. J. (1999). Forecasting accuracy, rational expectations, and market efficiency in the US beef cattle industry. Selected paper, American Agricultural Economics Association Meeting, Nashville, TN Aug. 8–11.

  • Stein, J. L. (1981). Speculative price: economic welfare and the idiot of chance. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 63, 223–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, F. A. & Bange, G. A. (1999). Understanding USDA crop forecasts. miscellaneous publication no. 1554, NASS/WAOB, USDA.

  • White, K. J. (1997). SHAZAM: The econometrics computer program (p.124). User’s Reference Manual Version 8.0, McGraw-Hill.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sung Chul No.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

No, S.C., Salassi, M.E. A Sequential Rationality Test of USDA Preliminary Price Estimates for Selected Program Crops: Rice, Soybeans, and Wheat. Int Adv Econ Res 15, 470–482 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-009-9228-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-009-9228-5

Keywords

  • A sequential rationality test
  • USDA price estimates
  • Time-series model

JEL

  • D40
  • Q11
  • C32
  • C53
  • C10
  • Q00