Skip to main content
Log in

FDI Effects on National Competitiveness: A Cluster Approach

  • Published:
International Advances in Economic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the close relationship between the activities of multinational enterprises (MNEs) and the competitiveness of host countries, few studies have linked these two subjects from a global perspective. Combining Porter’s approach and the work accomplished by international business economists provides a powerful analytical tool with which to review the recent empirical and theoretical literature on the effects of foreign direct investment (FDI) on national competitiveness. The contention is that FDI can indeed be a source of competitiveness but that previous studies have neglected the role of location, in particular the role of clustering on the absorptive capacity of the host State. The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive conceptual framework for assessing the effects of FDI on competitiveness to guide policy-makers as well as further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitken, B., & Harrison, A. (1999). Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review, 89(3), 605–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D., & Feldman, M. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86(3), 630–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrell, R., & Pain, N. (1997). Foreign direct investment, technological change, and economic growth within Europe. Economic Journal, 107, 1770–1786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J. (2000). Upgrading of industry clusters and foreign investment. International Studies of Management & Organization, 30(2), 93–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., & Sölvell, Ö. (2000). Preface. International Studies of Management & Organization, 30(2), 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomström, M., & Kokko, A. (1998). Multinational corporations and spillovers. Journal of Economic Surveys, 12(2), 247–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomström, M., & Sjoholm, F. (1998). Technology transfer and spillovers: Does local participation with multinationals matter? NBER Working Paper 6816, MA: Cambridge.

  • Bloningen, B. A., & Slaughter, M. J. (2001). Foreign-affiliate activity and U.S. skill upgrading. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(2), 362–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J., & Iammarino, S. (2000). Multinational corporations and the location of technological innovation in the UK regions. Regional Studies, 34(4), 317–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M. (1990). Enterprise and competitiveness. A systems view of international business. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. E. (1974). Multinational firms, competition, and productivity in host country markets. Economica, 41, 176–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driffield, N. (2001). The impact on domestic productivity of inward investment in the UK. Manchester School, 69(1), 103–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driffield, N., & Love, J. H. (2003). Foreign direct investment, technology sourcing and reverse spillovers. Manchester School, 71/6, 659–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driffield, N., & Taylor, K. (2002). Spillovers from FDI and skill structures of host-country firms. Discussion Papers in Economics 02/4, Department of Economics, University of Leicester.

  • Dunning, J. H. (1993). The globalisation of business. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1993a). Internationalizing Porter’s diamond. Management International Review, 33, 7–15 (special issue).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1993b). Multinational enterprises and the Global economy. Addison Wesley.

  • Dunning, J. H., & Gugler, P. (1994). Technology based cross-border alliances. In D. J. Jeremy (Ed.), Technology transfer and business enterprised. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H., & Narula, R. (2004). Multinationals and industrial competitiveness. A new agenda. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enright, M. J. (2000) The globalisation of competition and the location of competitive advantage: Policies towards regional clustering. In N. Hood, & S. Young (Eds.), The globalisation of multinational enterprise activity and economic development (pp. 303–331). London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girma, S., Greenaway, D., & Wakelin, K. (2001). Who benefits from foreign direct investment in the UK? Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 48(2) 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Görg, H., & Strobl, E. (2001). Multinational companies and productivity spillovers: a meta-analysis. Economic Journal, 111, F723–F739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Görg, H., Strobl, E., & Walsh, F. (2002). Why do foreign owned firms pay more? The role of on-the-job training. Discussion Paper no. 590, Institute for the Study of Labour (IZA), Germany.

  • Gugler, P. (2004). The WTO and the race for inward FDI in the European union. In L. Oxelheim, & P. Ghauri (Eds.), European Union and the race for foreign direct investment in Europe (pp. 59–100). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobday, M. (1995). Innovation in East Asia: The challenge to Japan. London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, U., Malmberg, A., & Sölvell, Ö. (2002). MNC impact on local clusters – the case of foreign owned subsidiaries in Sweden. Paper presented at the EIBA Conference.

  • Hubert, F., & Pain, N. (2001). Inward investment and technical progress in the United Kingdom manufacturing sector. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 48(2), 134–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketels, C. (2004). European clusters. Published in structural change in Europe 3-innovative city and business regions. Bollschweil: Hagbarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S. (2001). Competitiveness, technology and skills. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, R., & Sjöholm, F. (2004). Host country impacts of FDI: Why such different answers? Working Paper 192.

  • Markusen, J. M., & Venables, A. J. (1999). Foreign direct investment as a catalyst for industrial development. European Economic Review, 43, 335–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1920/1960). Principles of economics, book IV: The agents of production, land, labour, capital and organization (9th ed.). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, H.-C., Rugman, A., & Verbeke, A. (1998). A generalized double diamond approach to the international competitiveness of Korea and Singapore. International Business Review, 7, 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narula, R., & Marin, A. (2003). Foreign direct investment spillovers, absorptive capacities and human economic development: Evidence from Argentina. ILO Working Paper no. 96.

  • Oxelheim, L., & Ghauri, P. (2004). The race for FDI in the European Union. In L. Oxelheim, & P. Ghauri (Eds.), European Union and the race for foreign direct investment in Europe (pp. 59–100). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozawa, T. (1992) Foreign direct investment and economic development. Transnational Corporations, 1/1, 27–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Boston MA: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1998). On competition. Boston MA: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A., & D’Cruz, J. (1993). The “Double Diamond” model of international competitiveness: The Canadian experience. Management International Review, 33, 17–39 (special issue).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A., & Verbeke, A. (2002). Multinational enterprises and clusters: An organising framework. Working Paper.

  • Santangelo, G. D. (2005). FDI and localised spillovers in peripheral areas: The role of location motives and market relationships in Etna Valley. Paper presented at the EIBA Conference.

  • Smale, A. (2004). HRM integration in the global firm: A knowledge transfer perspective. Paper presented at the EIBA Conference.

  • UNCTAD. (2005). World investment report. Transnational corporations and the internationalisation of R&D. New York and Geneva: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Linde, C. (2003). The demography of clusters-findings from the cluster meta-study. In J. Bröcker, D. Dohse, & R. Soltwedel (Eds.), Innovation, clusters and interregional competition (pp 130–149). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B., & Lichtenberg, F. (2001). Does foreign direct investment transfer technology across borders. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(3), 490–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, S., Hood, N., & Peters, E. (1994). Multinational enterprises and regional economic development. Regional Studies, 28(7), 657–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serge Brunner.

Additional information

This study is part of the research project entitled, “Multilateral Rules on Trade and Investment,” supported by the NCCR project “International Trade Regulation: From Fragmentation to Coherence,” World Trade Institute (WTI), Berne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gugler, P., Brunner, S. FDI Effects on National Competitiveness: A Cluster Approach. Int Adv Econ Res 13, 268–284 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-007-9091-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-007-9091-1

Keywords

JEL

Navigation