Skip to main content
Log in

The Hidden Structural Features of the Fiscal Rule: A European Saga

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Advances in Economic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper addresses the question of the reform of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP). More and more authors and policymakers are bringing to light the negative impacts of the European deficit rule on the countries and their ability to respond asymmetric economic shocks, and some are asking for a redefinition of the pact. If the focus of the SGP is only fiscal, and two of the biggest countries in Europe have failed to abide by the pact since its implementation, it seems clear that the SGP needs at least a re-examination. Yet, on the contrary, if we introduce into the analytical framework the SGP’s impacts on the European Union’s structural policies, the conclusions are far different. Abolishing the SGP could hinder the presently up-to-date convergence prospective. This paper proposes a theoretical analysis of the SGP that emphasizes a new feature of the SGP: a strong incentive to structural reforms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesina, Alberto; Gali, Jordi; Giavazzi, Francesco; Uhlig, Harald; Blanchard, Olivier. “Defining a Macroeconomic Framework for the Euro Area,” Monitoring the European Central Bank, CEPR, 3, 2001.

  • Amtenbrik, F. J.; De Haan, Jakob; Sleijpen, O. C. H. M. “Stability and Growth Pact: Placebo or Panacea?,” European Business Law Review, 1997, pp. 202–10, 223–38.

  • Andersen, Torbe M.; Sorensen, Jan-Rose. “Unemployment and Fiscal Policy in an Economic and Monetary Union,” European Journal of Political Economy, 11, 1995, pp. 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arestis, Philip; Mccauley, Kevin; Sawyer, M. “The Future of the Euro: Is There an Alternative to the Stability and Growth Pact?,” Public Policy Brief, Levy Institute, 63, 2001.

  • Beestma, Roel; Uhlig, Harald. “An Analysis of the Stability and Growth Pact,” Economic Journal, 109, 1999, pp. 546–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beetsma, Roel; Bovenberg, A. Lans. “The Interaction of Fiscal and Monetary Policy in a Monetary Union: Balancing Credibility and Flexibility,” Working Papers Tilburg Center for Economic Research, 95101, 1995.

  • Beetsma, Roel M. W. J.; Bovenberg, A. Lans. “The Optimality of a Monetary Union without a Fiscal Union,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 33, 2, May 2001, pp. 179–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buiter, Willem H.; Corsetti, Giancarlo; Roubini, Nouriel. “Excessive Deficits: Sense and Nonsense in the Treaty of Maastricht,” Economic Policy, 16, 1993, pp. 58–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buti, Marco; Roeger, Werner; Veld, Jan In’t. “Stabilizing Output and Inflation: Policy Conflicts and Co-operation under a Stability Pact,” Journal of Common Market Studies, 39, 5, December 2001, pp. 801–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collignon, Stephan. “Is Europe Going Far Enough? Reflections on the Stability and Growth Pact, the Lisbon Strategy and the EU’s Economic Governance,” European Political Economy Review, 1, 2, Autumn 2003, pp. 222–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collignon, S. “The End of the Stability and Growth Pact?,” International Economics and Economic Policy, 1, 1, March 2004, pp. 15–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Grauwe, Paul. Economics of Monetary Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Haan, Jakob; Berger, Helge J.; Jansen David-Jan. “The End of the Stability and Growth Pact?,” CESifo Working Paper, 1093, 2003.

  • Delors, Jacques. Economic and Monetary Union, Luxembourg: Office of Official Publications of the European Communities, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, Barry; Wyplosz, Charles. “The Stability Pact: More than a Minor Nuisance,” Economic Policy, 1998, pp. 67–113.

  • European Commission. “Meeting of Heads of State or Government,” CIG 85/04, June 17 & 18, 2004, pp. 1–30.

  • Fatas, Antonio; Mihov, Ilian. “On Constraining Fiscal Policy Discretion in EMU,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2003, Forthcoming.

  • Glick, Reuven; Hutchison, Michael M. “Fiscal Policies in Monetary Unions: Implications for Europe,” Open Economies Review 4, 1993, pp. 39–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godhart, Charles. “EMU in Europe: A UK Perspective,” in Exchange Rate Regimes and Currency Unions, Ernst Baltensperger and Hans Werner (eds.), New York, St Martin’s Press, 1992, pp. 1983–2199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gros, Daniel. “A Stability Pact for Public Debt?,” CEPS Policy Brief, 30, January 2003.

  • Mathieu, Catherine; Sterdyniak, Henri. “Reforming the Stability and Growth Pact: Breaking the Ice,” OFCE, 03, 2003.

  • Muscatelli, Vito A.; Natale, Piergiovanna; Tirelli, Patrizio. “A Simple and Flexible Alternative to the Stability and Growth Pact Deficit Ceilings. Is it at Hand?,” CESifo Working Paper, 1006, 2003.

  • Pisani-Ferry, Jean. “Fiscal Discipline and Policy Coordination in the Eurozone: Assessment and Proposals,” European Commission President’s Group of Economic Analysis, Brussels, May, 2002.

  • Vijselaar, Focco W. “Macroeconomic Policy Co-ordination in the Euro Area,” Netherlands Central Bank MEB Series, 2000-5, June 2000.

  • Vranceanu, Radu; Warin, Thierry. “EMU: Optimal Fiscal Strategy and the Punishment Effectiveness,” Review of International Economics, 9, 3, 2001, pp. 494–504.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author would like to thank the participants of the International Atlantic Economic Conference in Quebec City (Oct. 16–19, 2003) for their helpful comments, Kenneth Donahue, and two anonymous referees. The usual caveat applies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Warin, T. The Hidden Structural Features of the Fiscal Rule: A European Saga. Int Adv Econ Res 11, 29–38 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-004-7172-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-004-7172-y

JEL

Navigation