Is Slow Economic Growth the ‘New Normal’ for Europe?
- 207 Downloads
This paper considers future European growth prospects in the light of a new productivity paradox, namely, the co-existence of a productivity slowdown and exciting new technologies. Several potential explanations are reviewed. It is argued that while some are unpersuasive it is too soon to be sure which carry the most weight. This has the implication that while the slowdown is real, it is not necessarily permanent. A key, hotly disputed issue is the future economic impact of technological progress on which forecasts differ dramatically. Supply-side reform could have a strong positive effect, but this is not likely to happen.
KeywordsGrowth projections Productivity paradox Supply-side policy Technological progress
JELE24 N14 O47
- Aghion, P., Bergeaud, A., Boppart, T., Klenow, P. J., & Li, H. (2017). Missing growth from creative destruction. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Research Working Paper #4. Available at: http://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/working-papers/.
- Ahmad, N., & Schreyer, P. (2016). Are GDP and productivity measures up to the challenges of the digital economy? International Productivity Monitor, 30, 4–27.Google Scholar
- Antolin-Diaz, J., Drechsel, T. and Petrella, I. (2017). Tracking the slowdown in long-run GDP growth, Review of Economics and Statistics, 99(2), 343–356.Google Scholar
- Arntz, M., Gregory, T. and Zierahn, U. (2016). The risk of automation in OECD countries: A comparative analysis”, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper No. 189. doi: 10.1787/5jlz9h56dvq7-en.
- Bakker, G., Crafts, N. and Woltjer, P. (2015). A vision of the growth process in a technologically progressive economy: The United States, 1899–1941. University of Warwick CAGE Working Paper No 257. Available at: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/research/centres/cage/manage/publications/257-2015_crafts.pdf.
- Barnes, S., Bouis, R., Briard, P., Dougherty, S. and Eris, M. (2011). The GDP impact of reform: A simple simulation framework. OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 834. doi: 10.1787/5kgk9qjnhkmt-en.
- Bartelsman, E. J. (2013). ICT, reallocation and productivity. European Economy Economic Papers No. 486.Google Scholar
- Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
- Byrne, D. and Corrado, C. (2017a). ICT prices and ICT services: What do they tell us about productivity and technology? Federal Reserve Board Finance and Economics Discussion Paper No. 2017-015.Google Scholar
- Byrne, D. and Corrado, C. (2017b). Accounting for innovation in consumer digital services. Paper presented to NBER conference on measuring and accounting for innovation in the 21st century: Washington DC.Google Scholar
- Byrne, D. M., Oliner, S. D., & Sichel, D. E. (2013). Is the information technology revolution over? International Productivity Monitor, 25, 20–36.Google Scholar
- Byrne, D., Fernald, J. and Reinsdorf, M B. (2016). Does the United States have a productivity slowdown or a measurement problem? Brookings papers on economic activity (Spring), 109–157.Google Scholar
- Crafts, N. and Mills, T. C. (2017). Trend TFP growth: Forecasts versus outcomes. University of Warwick CAGE Working Paper No. 329. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/research/centres/cage/manage/publications/329-2017_crafts.pdf
- David, P. A. (1991). Computer and dynamo: The modern productivity paradox in a not-too-distant mirror. In OECD, Technology and productivity: The challenge for economic policy (pp. 315–347). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
- Decker, R., Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R. S. and Miranda, J. (2017). Declining dynamism, allocative efficiency and the productivity slowdown. Federal Reserve Board Finance and Economics Discussion Paper No. 2017-019.Google Scholar
- Encaoua, D. (2009). Nature of the European technology gap: Creative destruction or industrial policy? In D. Foray (Ed.), The new economics of technology policy (pp. 281–314). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Frontier Economics (2014), Rates of return to investment in science and innovation, London.Google Scholar
- Greenspan, A. (2000). Technology and the economy. Speech to the Economic Club of New York, January 13. http://federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2000/200001132.htm
- Hansen, A. H. (1939). Economic progress and declining population growth. American Economic Review, 29, 1–15.Google Scholar
- Havik, K., McMorrow, K., Orlandi, F., Planas, C., Raciborski, R., Röger, W., Rossi, A., Thum-Thysen, A. and Vandermeulen, V. (2014). The production function methodology for calculating potential growth rates and output gaps. European Economy Economic Papers No. 535.Google Scholar
- Johansson, A., Heady, C., Arnold, J., Brys, B. and Vartis, L. (2008). Taxation and economic growth. OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 620. http://doi.org/10.1787/241216205486.
- Meltzer, A. H. (2003). A history of the Federal Reserve: Vol. 1, 1913–1951. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Nicoletti, G. and Scarpetta, S. (2005). Regulation and economic performance: Product market reforms and productivity in the OECD. OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 460. doi: 10.1787/726517007575.
- OECD (2012). OECD economic outlook 2012 issue 1. doi: 10.1787/eco_outlook-v2012-1-en.
- OECD (2014a). OECD economic outlook 2014 issue 1. doi: 10.1787/eco_outlook-v2014-1-en.
- OECD (2014b). Employment Protection Statistics. https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=EPL_C
- OECD (2014c). Product market regulation statistics. doi: 10.1787/pmr-data-en.
- OECD (2014d). Tax-benefit models. http://www.oecd.org/els/soc/benefits-and-wages.htm
- OECD (2016a). Education at a glance. doi: 10.1787/eag-2016-en.
- OECD (2016b). Main science and technology indicators. doi: 10.1787/msti-v2016-2-en.
- Ollivaud, P., Guillemette, Y. and Turner, D. (2016). “Links between weak investment and the slowdown in productivity and potential output growth across the OECD”, OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 1304. doi: 10.1787/5jlwvz0smq45-en.
- Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation (2017). CBT Database. http://www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/faculty-research/tax/publications/data
- The Conference Board (2016), The conference board total economy database, May 2016, http://www.conference-board.org/data/economy database/
- United States Congressional Budget Office (2016), An update to the budget and economic outlook, 2016-2026, August 2016, http://www.cbo.gov/publication/51908