Abstract
Four alternative generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH), and three asymmetric GARCH models (EGARCH, TGARCH and APARCH) are used to examine the presence of volatility persistence and news asymmetry in soybeans futures data. Presence of fat tails in the data series resulted in applying Student’s-t and generalized error distributions in addition to Gaussian normal distribution. The results reveal that soybean return series exhibit volatility characteristics typical of a financial time series. The findings of this study indicate that the leverage effect was absent for soybeans suggesting that positive news causes more volatility to the commodity than negative news. Results further suggest that the fit of the GARCH models is improved by applying t-distribution errors. The diagnostic tests reveal that GARCH models are correctly specified and among all the competing models, APARCH (1,3) model with t-distribution performed best in capturing the volatility.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, C. (2001). Market models: A guide to financial data analysis. New York: Wiley.
Apergis, N., & Rezitis, A. (2003). Agricultural price volatility spillover effects: the case of Greece. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 30(3), 389–406.
Asteriou, D., & Hall, S. (2011). Applied econometrics. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Bekaert, G., & Wu, G. (2000). Asymmetric volatility and risk in equity markets. Review of Financial Studies, 13(1), 1–42.
Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307–327.
Bollerslev, T. (1987). A conditional heteroscedastic time series model for speculative prices rates of return. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(3), 542–547.
Bollerslev, T., & Wooldridge, J. M. (1992). Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation and inference in dynamic models with time varying covariances. Econometric Review, 11(2), 143–172.
Bollerslev, T., Chou, R. Y., & Kroner, K. F. (1992). ARCH modeling in finance. Journal of Econometrics, 52(1), 5–59.
Brooks, C. (2008). Introductory econometrics for finance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ding, Z., Granger, C. W. J., & Engle, R. F. (1993). A long memory property of stock returns and a new model. Journal of Empirical Finance, 1(1), 83–106.
Engle, R. F., & Ng, V. (1993). Measuring and testing the impact of news on volatility. Journal of Finance, 48(5), 1749–1778.
Gilbert, C. L., & Morgan, C. W. (2011). Food price volatility. In I. Piot-Lepetit & R. M’Barek (Eds.), Methods to analyse agricultural commodity price volatility (pp. 45–61). New York: Springer.
Glosten, L. R., Jagannathan, R., & Runkle, D. E. (1993). On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on Stocks. Journal of Finance, 48(5), 1779–1801.
Guida, T., & Matringe, O. (2004). Application of GARCH models in forecasting the volatilities of agricultural commodities. Université de Savoie and UNCTAD. Working Paper.
Hens, T., & Steude, S. (2009). The leverage effect without leverage. Finance Research Letters. doi:10.1016/j.frl.2009.01.002.
Jondeau, E., & Rockinger, M. (2003). Conditional volatility, skewness, and kurtosis: existence, persistence, and co-movements. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 27(10), 1699–1737.
Jordaan, H., Grove, B., Jooste, A., & Alemu, A. G. (2007). Measuring the price volatility of certain field crops in South Africa using ARCH/GARCH approach. Agrekon, 46(3), 306–322.
Kovacic, Z. J. (2008). Forecasting volatility: evidence from the Macedonian stock exchange. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 18, 182–212.
Nasar, S. (1991). For Fed, a new set of tea leaves. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/1991/07/05/business/for-fed-a-new-set-of-tea-leaves.html.
Nelson, D. (1991). Conditional heteroscedasticity in asset returns: a new approach. Econometrica, 59(2), 347–350.
Pagan, A. R., & Schwert, G. W. (1990). Alternative models for conditional stock volatilities. Journal of Econometrics, 45(1), 267–290.
Poon, S. H., & Granger, C. W. (2003). Forecasting volatility in financial markets: a review. Journal of Economic Literature, 41(2), 478–539.
Quandl Data Marketplace (2013) http://www.quandl.com.
Trujillo-Barrera, A., Mallory, M., & Garcia, P. (2012). Volatility spillovers in the U.S. crude oil, ethanol, and corn futures markets. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 37(2), 247–262.
Tsay, R. (2005). Analysis of financial time series. New York: Wiley.
Vercammen, J. (2011). Agricultural marketing: Structural models for price analysis. New York: Routledge.
Wang, N., & Houston, J. (2015). The Comovement between Non-GM and GM Soybean Price in China: Evidence from Dalian Futures Market. Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia.
Yang, J., Leatham, D.J., & Haigh, M.S. (1999). Agricultural liberalization policy and commodity price volatility: A GARCH application. Proceedings of 46th Agricultural Finance Conference: The Changing Nature of Agricultural Risks, Ontario, Canada.
Zakoian, J. M. (1994). Threshold herteroskedastic models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 18(5), 931–955.
Zivot, E., & Wang, J. (2006). Modeling financial time series with s-plus. New York: Springer science and business media.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Musunuru, N. Examining Volatility Persistence and News Asymmetry in Soybeans Futures Returns. Atl Econ J 44, 487–500 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-016-9517-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-016-9517-3