Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 357–366 | Cite as

Prediction Markets and Election Polling: Granger Causality Tests Using InTrade and RealClearPolitics Data

  • Christopher Duquette
  • Franklin G. MixonJr.
  • Richard J. Cebula
  • Kamal P. Upadhyaya
Article

Abstract

This study tests for direct causality between RealClearPolitics (RCP) polling averages and InTrade (IT) share-prices by performing Granger causality tests. These tests are applied to the 2012 U.S. presidential election campaign between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney. Three time series are considered in this analysis of causal links between RCP and IT. In all of the estimations, the null hypothesis that IT does not Granger cause RCP cannot be rejected. On the other hand, the null hypothesis that RCP does not Granger cause IT is rejected in a majority of cases. Overall, these results imply that RCP Granger causes IT. While the behavior of participants in prediction markets such as InTrade is informed by political polling, these Granger causality test results suggest that prediction markets add little to what is forecasted by the polls, particularly aggregation polls such as that from RealClearPolitics, regarding the outcome of presidential elections.

Keywords

Prediction markets Elections polling Voter preferences InTrade Granger causality 

JEL

D72 D83 G12 G14 D70 D80 

Notes

Disclosure

Christopher Duquette’s affiliation with The MITRE Corporation is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to convey or imply MITRE’s concurrence with, or support for, the positions, opinions, or viewpoints expressed by the authors.

References

  1. Akaike, H. (1969). Fitting auto-regressions for predictions. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 21, 243–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akaike, H. (1970). Statistical predictor identification. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 22, 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Attfield, C. (1982). An adjustment to the likelihood ratio statistic when testing hypotheses in the multivariate linear model using large samples. Economics Letters, 9, 345–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaulieu, M. C., Cosset, J. C., & Essaddam, N. (2006). Political uncertainty and stock market returns: Evidence from the 1995 Quebec referendum. Canadian Journal of Economics, 39, 621–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell, D. (2013). Osama bin Laden’s death, two years later, U.S. News and World Report, (2 May), available online at http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/press-past/2013/05/02/osama-bin-ladens-death-two-years-later. Accessed on 19 July 2013.
  6. Berg, J. E., Nelson, F., & Rietz, T. A. (2008). Prediction market accuracy in the long run. International Journal of Forecasting, 24, 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blake, (2012). Six reasons Mitt Romney won the first debate, The Washington Post (3 October), available online at http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2012/10/04/six-reasons-mitt-romney-won-the-first-debate/. Accessed on 19 July 2013.
  8. Brown, W. O., Jr. (1996). Friends in high places: The wealth effects of JFK’s assassination on the assets of LBJ’s supporters. Public Choice, 86, 247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burke, J., & Taylor, C. (2008). What’s in a poll? Incentives for truthful reporting in pre-election opinion surveys. Public Choice, 137, 221–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cebula, R. J., & Hulse, D. (2007). The polls results hypothesis. Atlantic Economic Journal, 35, 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cebula, R. J., & Meads, H. (2008). An inquiry into the contemporary differential between female and male voter turnouts. Atlantic Economic Journal, 36, 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chatrath, A., Christie-David, R., & Moore, W. T. (2006). The macroeconomic news cycle and uncertainty resolution. Journal of Business, 79, 2,633–2,657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Christie-David, R., Chaudry, M., & Koch, T. W. (2000). Do macroeconomics news releases affect gold and silver prices? Journal of Economics and Business, 52, 405–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Christie-David, R., Chaudry, M., & Lindley, J. T. (2003). The effects of unanticipated macroeconomic news on debt markets. Journal of Financial Research, 26, 319–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ejara, D. D., Nag, N., & Upadhyaya, K. (2012). Opinion polls and the stock market: Evidence from the 2008 U.S. presidential election. Applied Financial Economics, 22, 437–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Erikson, R. S., & Wlezien, C. (2012). Markets vs. polls as election predictors: An historical assessment. Electoral Studies, 31, 532–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37, 424–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gustafson, C. (2008). On web, political junkies make a Real Clear choice, New York Sun (10 March), available online http://www.nysun.com/business/on-web-political-junkies-make-a-real-clear-choice/72596/.
  19. Hsiao, C. (1981). Autoregressive modeling and money-income causality detection. Journal of Monetary Economics, 7, 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kennedy, P. (2008). A guide to econometrics. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Leamer, E. E. (1978). Specification searches: Ad hoc inference with non-experimental data. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Leamer, E. E. (1988). Things that bother me. The Economic Record, 64, 331–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morgan, J., & Stocken, P. C. (2008). Information aggregation in polls. American Economic Review, 98, 864–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rhode, P. W., & Strumpf, K. S. (2004). Historic presidential betting markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18, 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sinclair, B., & Plott, C. R. (2012). From uninformed to informed choices: Voters, pre-election polls and updating. Electoral Studies, 31, 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stout, C., & Kline, R. (2011). I’m not voting for her: Polling discrepancies and female candidates. Political Behavior, 33, 479–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zorn, E. (2006). “Political site polls well with election junkies,” Chicago Tribune (26 October), available online at: http://blogs.chicagotribune.com/news_columnists_ezorn/2006/04/good_riddance_t.html.

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Duquette
    • 1
  • Franklin G. MixonJr.
    • 2
  • Richard J. Cebula
    • 3
  • Kamal P. Upadhyaya
    • 4
  1. 1.The MITRE CorporationMcLeanUSA
  2. 2.Center for Economic EducationColumbus State UniversityColumbusUSA
  3. 3.Department of Economics and FinanceJacksonville UniversityJacksonvilleUSA
  4. 4.Department of EconomicsUniversity of New HavenWest HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations