Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 115–122 | Cite as

The Wealth-Health Nexus: New Global Evidence

Article

Abstract

Using a world sample of countries, this paper re-examines the U-shaped relationship between per capita GDP (wealth) and life expectancy at birth (health). Since cross-sectional dependence across countries is detected, second-generation panel unit root and cointegration tests are employed. All the variables are found to be integrated in one order as well as cointegrated. Various quadratic specifications are also employed and the hypothesis is confirmed.

Keywords

Per capita GDP Life expectancy Cross-sectional dependence Panel FMOLS 

JEL

I15 C33 O11 

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S. (2007). Disease and development: the effect of life expectancy on economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 115(6), 925–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghion, P., Howitt, P. & Murtin, F. (2010). “The relationship between health and growth: When Lucas meets Nelson–Phelps,” NBER Working Paper 1581. Online at: http://www.ofce.sciences-po.fr/pdf/dtravail/WP2009-28.pdf.
  3. Bloom, D.E., Canning, D. & Fink G. (2009). “Disease and development revisited,” NBER Working Paper No. 15137. Online at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w15137.pdf.
  4. Cervellati, M., & Sunde, U. (2011). Life expectancy and economic growth: the role of the demographic transition. Journal of Economic Growth, 16(2), 99–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Greene, W. H. (1993). Econometric analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  6. Hadri, K., & Kurozumi, E. (2012). A simple panel stationarity tests in the presence of cross-sectional dependence. Economics Letters, 115(1), 31–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hansen, C. W. (2012). The relation between wealth and health: evidence from a world panel of countries. Economics Letters, 115(2), 175–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Karlsson, S., & Löthgren, M. (2000). On the power and interpretation of panel unit root tests. Economics Letters, 66(3), 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of unit root. Journal of Econometrics, 54(1–3), 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Narayan, P. K., & Popp, S. (2010). A new unit root test with two structural breaks in level and slope at unknown time. Journal of Applied Statistics, 37(9), 1425–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pedroni, P. (2001). Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(4), 727–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pesaran, M.H. (2004). “General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels.” Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, 0435, Online at: http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/faculty/pesaran/CDtestPesaranJune04.pdf.
  14. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Prais, S.J. & Winsten C.B. (1954). “Trend Estimation and Serial Correlation.” Cowles Commission Discussion Paper No. 383, Chicago.Google Scholar
  16. Romero-Ávila, D. (2008). A confirmatory analysis of the unit root hypothesis for OECD consumption income ratios. Applied Economics, 40(17), 2271–2278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. StataCorp. (2007). Stata Statistical Software: Release 10. College Station: StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
  18. Turan, B. (2009). “Life Expectancy and economic development: Evidence from micro data.” Working Paper. Online at: http://www.uh.edu/~bkturan/lifeexpec.pdf.
  19. Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(6), 709–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Zhang, J., & Zhang, J. (2005). The effect of life expectancy on fertility, saving, schooling and economic growth: theory and evidence. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 107(1), 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Energy Policy and EconomicsETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations