Skip to main content

Power Law Versus Exponential Law in Characterizing Stock Market Returns

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Gopikrishnan, P., Meyer, M., Amaral, L. A. N., & Stanley, H. E. (1998). Inverse cubic law for the distribution of stock price variations. The European Physical Journal B, 3(2), 139–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lux, T. (1996). The stable paretian hypothesis and the frequency of large returns: an examination of major German stocks. Applied Financial Economics, 6(6), 463–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantegna, R. N., & Stanley, H. E. (1995). Scaling behaviour in the dynamics of an economic index. Nature, 376(6535), 46–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matia, K., Pal, M., Salunkay, H., & Stanley, H. E. (2004). Scale dependent price flunctuations for the Indian Stock Market. Europhysics Letters, 66(6), 909–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahua Barari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barari, M., Mitra, S. Power Law Versus Exponential Law in Characterizing Stock Market Returns. Atl Econ J 36, 377–379 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-008-9131-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-008-9131-0

JEL

  • G10