Abstract
This paper uses a logit model to test whether voters will alter their support for incumbents in state level elections, specifically gubernatorial and state house and senate elections, when local (i.e., county) economic conditions are observed. The results signify that voters do hold the incumbent party responsible for economic conditions. Furthermore, voters tend to place more emphasis on unemployment levels than on real personal income indicating that incumbent politicians might want to engage in policies that put people to work rather than on policies that raise income. The results also suggest that voters did not hold their state house and senate representative as responsible for local economic conditions as they did the governor.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Adams, J.; Kenny, L. “The Retention of State Governors,” Public Choice, 62, July 1989, pp. 1–13.
Aldrich, J. H.; Nelson, F. D. Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Beverly Hills, California: Sage, 1984.
Berry, W. D.; Berkman, M. D.; Schneiderman, S. “Legislative Professionalism and Incumbent Reelection: The Development of Institutional Boundaries,” American Political Science Review, 94, December 2000, pp. 859–874.
Besley, T.; Case, A. “Political Institutions and Policy Choices: Evidence from the United States,” Journal of Economic Literature, 61, March 2003, pp. 7–73.
Carey, J. M.; Niemi, R. G.; Powell, L. W. “Incumbency and the Probability of Reelection in State Legislative Elections,” The Journal of Politics, 62, August 2000, pp. 671–700.
Case, A. “Taxes and the Electoral Cycle: How Sensitive Are Governors To Coming Elections?,” Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business Review, March–April 1994, pp. 17–26.
Chubb, J. E. “Institutions, the Economy, and the Dynamics of State Elections,” The American Political Science Review, 82, March 1988, pp. 133–154.
Erikson, R. S. “Economic Conditions and the Congressional Vote: A Review of the Macrolevel Evidence,” American Journal of Political Science, 34, May 1990, pp. 373–399.
Fair, R. C. “The Effect of Economic Events on Votes for the President,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 60, May 1978, pp. 159–173.
Galeotti, G.; Forcina, A. “Political Loyalties and the Economy: The U.S. Case,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, August 1989, pp. 511–517.
Gelman, A.; King, G. “Estimating Incumbency Advantage Without Bias,” American Journal of Political Science, 34, November 1990, pp. 1142–1163.
Gujarati, D. N. Basic Econometrics, NewYork: McGraw-Hill, 1988.
Hibbs, D. “Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy,” American Political Science Review, 71, December 1977, pp. 1467–1487.
—. “Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policies and Outcomes in the United States,” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 76, May 1986, pp. 66–70.
Jacobson, G. C. “Does the Economy Matter in Midterm Elections?,” American Journal of Political Science, 34, May 1990, pp. 400–404.
Kiewiet, R.; Udell, M. “Twenty-Five Years after Kramer: An Assessment of Economic Retrospective Voting Based Upon Improved Estimates of Income and Unemployment,” Economics and Politics, 10, November 1998, pp. 219–248.
Levernier, W. “Election Outcomes and Economic Conditions: An Application of a Logit Model,” Journal of Economics and Finance, 17, Spring 1993, pp. 115–125.
McRae, D. C. “A Political Model of the Business Cycle,” Journal of Political Economy, 85, April 1977, pp. 239–263.
Nadeau, R.; Blais, A.; Nevitte, N.; Gidengil, E. “It's Unemployment, Stupid! Why Perceptions about the Job Situation Hurt the Liberals in the 1997 Election,” Canadian Public Policy, 26, March 2000, pp. 77–94.
Nordhaus, W. H. “The Political Business Cycle,” Review of Economic Studies, 42, April 1975, pp. 169–189.
Peltzman, S. “Economic Conditions and Gubernatorial Elections,” American Economic Review, 77, May 1987, pp. 293–297.
Powell, L. W. “Electoral Competition in House Primary Elections,” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington District of Columbia, (September 1993).
Simon, D. M.; Ostrom, C. W. Jr.; Marra, R. F. “The President, Referendum Voting, and Subnational Elections in the United States,” The American Political Science Review, 85, December 1991, pp. 1177–1192.
Smyth, D. J.; Taylor, S. W. “Regional Variations in the Social Preference Function Between Inflation and Unemployment,” The Review of Regional Studies, 21, Spring 1991, pp. 1–10.
—. “Inflation–Unemployment Trade-Offs of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents: Empirical Evidence on the Partisan Theory,” Journal of Macroeconomics, 14, Winter 1992, pp. 47–57.
—. “Do Group-specific or National Unemployment Rates Influence Perceptions?,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 19, December 1992, pp. 379–388.
Smyth, D. J.; Dua, P.; Taylor, S. W. “Voters and Macroeconomics: Are They Forward Looking or Backward Looking?,” Public Choice, 78, March 1994, pp. 283–293.
Stein, R. M. “Economic Voting for Governor and U.S. Senator: The Electoral Consequence of Federalism,” Journal of Politics, 52, February 1990, pp. 29–53.
Stock, J. H.; Watson, M. W. Introduction to Econometrics, Boston: Addison-Wesley, 2003.
Wooldridge, J. M. Introductory Econometrics, Mason, Ohio: Thomson South-Western, 2003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mitchell, D.M., Willett, K. Local Economic Performance and Election Outcomes. Atl Econ J 34, 219–232 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-006-9008-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-006-9008-z
JEL
- H31
- H70