Skip to main content
Log in

“It’s illegal to buy drugs from street dealers”—a video-based pre-post study of a behavioral intervention to displace dealers from an Amsterdam open-air drug market

  • Published:
Journal of Experimental Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

A high number of street dealers operate in the Red Light District in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. To displace the dealers, the Municipality of Amsterdam installed text-based light projections in a street attracting a high number of dealers.

Methods

To evaluate the intervention, we did a pre-post analysis of video footage from two CCTV cameras located in the street. In total, we analyzed 765 one-minute segments of footage from before and after the implementation.

Results

The implementation was followed by a four percentage point reduction in street dealers. However, the estimated effect shows fragileness with wide confidence intervals and a p-value just below 0.05, and a Bayesian robustness analysis suggests that the intervention was not associated with the outcome.

Conclusions

Analyzing CCTV-footage offers a unique avenue for evaluating small scale interventions in open-air drug markets. While we observed a decrease in the presence of dealers, the intervention still needs further validation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data of the study is available as supplementary material using the link supplied in the methods section (https://tinyurl.com/bdfj9auj).

References

  • Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods. Behaviour, 49(3), 227–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, D. J., Berger, J. O., Johannesson, M., Nosek, B. A., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Berk, R., Bollen, K. A., Brembs, B., Brown, L., & Camerer, C. (2018). Redefine statistical significance. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(1), 6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernasco, W., & Jacques, S. (2015). Where do dealers solicit customers and sell them drugs? A micro-level multiple method study. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31(4), 376–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A. A., Weisburd, D., & Turchan, B. (2018). Focused deterrence strategies and crime control: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Criminology & Public Policy, 17(1), 205–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham, P., & Brantingham, P. (1995). Criminality of place: Crime generators and crime attractors. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 3, 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breen, R., Karlson, K. B., & Holm, A. (2018). Interpreting and understanding logits, probits, and other nonlinear probability models. Annual Review of Sociology, 44, 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaurand, N., Bossart, F., & Delhomme, P. (2015). A naturalistic study of the impact of message framing on highway speeding. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 35, 37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquhoun, D. (2017). The reproducibility of research and the misinterpretation of p-values. Royal Society Open Science, 4(12), 171085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corsaro, N., Brunson, R. K., & McGarrell, E. F. (2013). Problem-oriented policing and open-air drug markets: Examining the Rockford pulling levers deterrence strategy. Crime & Delinquency, 59(7), 1085–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J. E. (1995). A general model of the geography of illicit retail marketplaces. Crime and Place, 4, 67–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J. E. (2002). Learning from experience in problem-oriented policing and situational prevention: The positive functions of weak evaluations and the negative functions of strong ones. Crime Prevention Studies, 14, 93–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ejbye-Ernst, P. (2023). Does third-party intervention matter? A video-based analysis of the effect of third-party intervention on the continuation of interpersonal conflict behaviour. The British Journal of Criminology, 63(1), 78–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. P. (1968). Crime, punishment, and deterrence. Social Science Quarterly, 48(4), 515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, M., & Loveday, K. (2003). What do offenders think about CCTV? Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 5, 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellevik, O. (2009). Linear versus logistic regression when the dependent variable is a dichotomy. Quality & Quantity, 43, 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, B. A. (1996). Crack dealers and restrictive deterrence: Identifying narcs. Criminology, 34(3), 409–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacques, S. (2019). Grey area: Regulating Amsterdam’s coffeeshops. UCL Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jacques, S., & Bernasco, W. (2013). Drug dealing: Amsterdam’s red light district. In Cognition and Crime: Offender Decision-Making and Script Analyses (pp. 120–139).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerolmack, C., & Khan, S. (2014). Talk is cheap: Ethnography and the attitudinal fallacy. Sociological Methods & Research, 43(2), 178–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 159–174.

  • Liebst, L. S., Ejbye-Ernst, P., de Bruin, M., Thomas, J., & Lindegaard, M. R. (2022). No evidence that mask-wearing in public places elicits risk compensation behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maimon, D., Alper, M., Sobesto, B., & Cukier, M. (2014). Restrictive deterrent effects of a warning banner in an attacked computer system. Criminology, 52(1), 33–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeller, K. (2016). Temporal transaction patterns in an open-air cannabis market. Police Practice and Research, 17(1), 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeller, K. (2018). Video-recorded retail cannabis trades in a low-risk marketplace: Trade value and temporal patterns. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 55(1), 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeller, K., Copes, H., & Hochstetler, A. (2016). Advancing restrictive deterrence: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 82–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer, A., & Legewie, N. M. (2018). Video data analysis: A methodological frame for a novel research trend. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(1), 135–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paternoster, R. (1987). The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: A review of the evidence and issues. Justice Quarterly, 4(2), 173–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philpot, R., Liebst, L. S., Møller, K. K., Lindegaard, M. R., & Levine, M. (2019). Capturing violence in the night-time economy: A review of established and emerging methodologies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 46, 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piliavin, I., Gartner, R., Thornton, C., & Matsueda, R. L. (1986). Crime, deterrence, and rational choice. American Sociological Review, 101–119.

  • Pinkster, F. M., & Boterman, W. R. (2017). When the spell is broken: Gentrification, urban tourism and privileged discontent in the Amsterdam canal district. Cultural Geographies, 24(3), 457–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piza, E. L., & Sytsma, V. A. (2016). Exploring the defensive actions of drug sellers in open-air markets: A systematic social observation. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 53(1), 36–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, J. H., & Wight, H. (2022). Policing the largest drug market on the eastern seaboard: Officer perspectives on enforcement and community safety. Policing: An International Journal, 45(5), 727–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stott, C., Adang, O., Livingstone, A., & Schreiber, M. (2007). Variability in the collective behaviour of England fans at Euro2004: ‘Hooliganism’, public order policing and social change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(1), 75–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sytsma, V. A., & Piza, E. L. (2018). Script analysis of open-air drug selling: A systematic social observation of CCTV footage. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 55(1), 78–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, N. (2010). Whither problem-oriented policing. Criminology & Pub. Pol’y, 9, 183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, N., & Pawson, R. (1997). Realistic evaluation. Realistic Evaluation, 1–256.

  • UNODC. (2004). World Drug Report 2004 (Vol. 1). United Nations Publications https://www.unodc.org/pdf/WDR_2004/volume_1.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 779–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., & Mazerolle, L. G. (2000). Crime and disorder in drug hot spots: Implications for theory and practice in policing. Police Quarterly, 3(3), 331–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken windows.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Ejbye-Ernst.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 338 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ejbye-Ernst, ., Moeller, K., Liebst, L.S. et al. “It’s illegal to buy drugs from street dealers”—a video-based pre-post study of a behavioral intervention to displace dealers from an Amsterdam open-air drug market. J Exp Criminol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-023-09602-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-023-09602-9

Keywords

Navigation