The effect of procedural injustice during emergency 911 calls: a factorial vignette-based study
This study tests the effects of procedurally unfair treatment by 911 dispatchers on behavioral intentions to cooperate with criminal justice professionals.
A factorial vignette design and a university-based sample (N = 488) were used. This study used two different vignettes, each of which involved a different type of emergency (i.e., a burglary incident and a traffic accident) and two experimental manipulations (i.e., procedural injustice and seriousness).
Participants who received the injustice stimuli reported they would be less likely call 911 in the future to report a similar incident, less likely to cooperate with the 911 operator if asked additional questions, and less willing to cooperate with the police once they arrived on the scene. In relative terms, the seriousness of the incident (e.g., amount of property stolen) mattered far less.
This study demonstrates that procedural injustice during 911 calls not only adversely affects dispatchers, but also the police when they arrive on the scene.
KeywordsEmergency 911 Face attack Legal socialization Police-citizen relations Procedural justice
Compliance with ethical standards
ASU’s institutional review board approved this protocol.
- Bradford, B., Jackson, J., & Hough, M. (2014). Police legitimacy in action: lessons for theory and practice. In M. Reisig & R. Kane (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of police and policing (pp. 551–569). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Filman, A. (2015). The emergency aid doctrine and 911 hang-ups: the modern general warrant. Vanderbilt Law Review, 68(3), 919–959.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. Garden City: Anchor.Google Scholar
- Osher, C. (2013). Denver’s 911 call review shows a pattern of problems. The Denver Post. Retrieved from https://www.denverpost.com. Accessed 19 Mar 2019.
- Tyler, T., & Huo, Y. (2002). Trust in the law. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar