Skip to main content
Log in

Addressing the “black box” of focused deterrence: an examination of the mechanisms of change in Chicago’s Project Safe Neighborhoods

  • Published:
Journal of Experimental Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Chicago’s Project Safe Neighborhoods focused deterrence program is an effective crime reduction policy. However, similar to other focused deterrence programs, prior evaluations have not empirically established the mechanisms of change believed to underlie the program. The purpose of this paper was to address this gap by examining the influence of offender notification meetings—a key component of the program—on three mechanisms: perceptions of risks associated with future offending, perceptions of police legitimacy, and adherence to community norms.

Methods

Over a 1-year period, parolees attending the notification meetings were randomly assigned to complete surveys assessing each of the mechanisms immediately before the meeting (control) or immediately after (treatment).

Results

Parolees in the treatment condition had higher perceptions of risk and police legitimacy compared to those in the control condition. Additionally, they were more likely to judge police as procedurally fair. The groups did not differ with respect to adherence to community norms. Within both groups, perception of risk was positively associated with motivation to stay out of prison. Police legitimacy was also positively associated with motivation for the treatment group, while community norm adherence was positively associated with motivation for those in the control condition.

Conclusions

This study indicates that the offender notification meetings are working as intended with respect to the underlying mechanisms of change embedded in Chicago’s Project Safe Neighborhoods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A one-way MANOVA revealed that district did not have significant multivariate (F(10, 1304) = .83, p = .68) or univariate effects (Fs(4, 331) = .46–1.33, p = .26–.76) on the outcomes.

  2. See supplemental appendix.

  3. See supplemental appendix for discussion of controlling type 1 error.

References

  • Braga, A. A., & Weisburd, D. L. (2012). The effects of focused deterrence strategies on crime: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49(3), 232–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427811419368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A. A., Weisburd, D. L., & Turchan, B. (2018). Focused deterrence strategies and crime control: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Criminology & Public Policy, 17(1), 205–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, R. S. (2018). Focused deterrence strategies save lives: introduction and discussion of an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Criminology & Public Policy, 17(1), 199–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald, B., & Papachristos, A. V. (2017). Project Safe Neighborhoods in Chicago: looking back a decade later. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 107(1), 131–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, J., Kling, J. R., & Mullainathan, S. (2011). Mechanism experiments and policy evaluations. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(3), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.25.3.17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meares, T., Papachristos, A. V., & Fagan, J. (2009). Homicide and gun violence in Chicago: evaluation and summary of the Project Safe Neighborhoods program. Research Brief. Available at www.saferfoundation.org/files/documents/2009-PSN-Research-Brief_v2.pdf

  • Papachristos, A. V., Meares, T. L., & Fagan, J. (2007). Attention felons: evaluating Project Safe Neighborhoods in Chicago. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4(2), 223–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00096.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Jackson, J. (2013). Future challenges in the study of legitimacy and criminal justice. In J. Tankebe & A. Liebling (Eds.), Legitimacy and criminal justice: An international exploration (pp. 83–104). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701996.003.0006.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Trinkner, R. (2018). Why children follow rules: legal socialization and the development of legitimacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, D., Papachristos, A. V., Meares, T., & Fagan, J. (2016). Desistance and legitimacy: the impact of offender notification meetings on recidivism among high risk offenders. Justice Quarterly, 33(7), 1237–1264. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2015.1081262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author gratefully acknowledges the support of Valerie Pinkston, United States Attorney’s Office Northern District of Illinois, for overseeing survey distribution and data collection. Without her efforts in the field, this study would not have been possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rick Trinkner.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 24 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trinkner, R. Addressing the “black box” of focused deterrence: an examination of the mechanisms of change in Chicago’s Project Safe Neighborhoods. J Exp Criminol 15, 673–683 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-019-09364-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-019-09364-3

Keywords

Navigation