Reluctant to embrace innocence: an experimental test of persevering culpability judgments on people’s willingness to support reintegration services for exonerees

  • Kyle C. Scherr
  • Christopher J. Normile
  • Maria Camila Sarmiento
Article

Abstract

Objectives

People are hesitant to fully support reintegration efforts (e.g., opportunities to receive psychological counseling, career counseling, job training, housing assistance, educational opportunities, financial compensation) to help exonerees wrongfully convicted of a crime. However, underlying reasons motivating people’s hesitancy remain unaddressed. This research examined the influence of being wrongfully convicted of a race stereotypic-consistent crime on people’s judgments of exonerees’ culpability and willingness to support reintegration programs.

Method

Using an experimental design, participants were randomly assigned to read a news story that depicted an African-American or White male who was exonerated after being wrongfully convicted of assault or embezzlement. Participants then offered their culpability judgments (i.e., their belief in the exoneree’s guilt and confidence in that belief) and willingness to support reintegration services.

Results

Participants were less confident of the exoneree’s innocence and less supportive of psychological counseling services when the exoneree was a White, compared to African-American, male wrongfully convicted of the race stereotypic-consistent crime of embezzlement. An exploratory conditional mediation analysis indicated that less confidence in the exoneree’s innocence after being wrongfully convicted of a race stereotypic-consistent crime was, in turn, associated with people’s hesitancy to support psychological counseling for the exoneree.

Conclusions

Basic and applied implications to overcome people’s hesitancy to support reintegration efforts for exonerees are discussed.

Keywords

Wrongful convictions Belief perseverance Stereotypes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant from from experiment.com (DOI: 10.18258/5182).

Supplementary material

11292_2017_9306_MOESM1_ESM.docx (21 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 20.8 kb)

References

  1. Blandisi, I. M., Clow, K. A., & Ricciardelli, R. (2015). Public perceptions of the stigmatization of wrongly convicted individuals: Findings from semi-structured interviews. The Qualitative Report, 20, 1881–1904.Google Scholar
  2. Bodenhausen, G. V. (1988). Stereotypic biases in social decision making and memory: Testing process models of stereotype use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 726–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bodenhausen, G. V., & Richeson, J. A. (2010). Prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination. In R. F. Baumeister & E. J. Finkel (Eds.), Advanced social psychology: The state of the science (pp. 341–383). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bodenhausen, G. V., & Wyer, R. S. (1985). Effects of stereotypes in decision making and information-processing strategies. Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 48, 267–282.Google Scholar
  5. Bullock, J. (2007). Experiments on partisanship and public opinion: Party cues, false beliefs, and Bayesian updating (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
  6. Clow, K. A., & Leach, A. M. (2013). After innocence: Perceptions of individuals who have been wrongfully convicted. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 20, 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clow, K. A., & Leach, A. M. (2015). Stigma and wrongful conviction: All exonerees are not perceived equal. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21, 172–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clow, K. A., Lant, J. M., & Cutler, B. C. (2013). Perceptions of defendant culpability in pretrial publicity: The effects of defendant ethnicity and participant gender. Race and Social Problems, 5, 250–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Critcher, C. R., & Dunning, D. (2011). No good deed goes unquestioned: Cynical reconstruals maintain belief in the power of self-interest. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1207–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Franks, A. S., & Scherr, K. C. (2014). A sociofunctional approach to prejudice at the polls: Are atheists more politically disadvantaged than gays and blacks? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 681–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garrett, B. L. (2011). Convicting the innocent: Where criminal prosecutions go wrong. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gawronski, B., Peters, K. R., Brochu, P. M., & Strack, F. (2008). Understanding the relations between different forms of racial prejudice: A cognitive consistency perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 648–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gross, S, Possley, M., & Stephens, K. (2017). Race and wrongful convictions in the United States. Retrieved from National Registry of Exonerations website: https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Documents/Race_and_Wrongful_Convictions.pdf
  14. Hayes, A. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guillford Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hurrwitz, J., & Peffley, M. (1997). Public perceptions of race and crime: The role of racial stereotypes. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 375–401.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2111769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones, C. S., & Kaplan, M. F. (2003). The effects of racially stereotypical crimes on juror decision-making and information-processing strategies. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Loftus, E. F. (1981). Eyewitness testimony: Psychological research and legal thought. Crime and Justice, 3, 105–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mancini, C., Mears, D. P., Stewart, E. A., Beaver, K. M., & Pickett, J. T. (2012). Whites’ perception about black criminality: A closer look at the contact hypothesis. Crime and Delinquency, 1–27.Google Scholar
  19. National Registry of Exonerations (2017). Retrieved April, 2017 from https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/detaillist.aspx
  20. Osborne, D., & Davies, P. G. (2013). Eyewitness identifications are affected by stereotypes about a suspect’s level of perceived stereotypicality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 488–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Owens, M. L., & Griffiths, E. (2012). Uneven reparations for wrongful convictions: Examining the state politics of statutory compensation legislation. Albany Law Review, 75, 1283–1327.Google Scholar
  22. Ross, L., Lepper, M. R., & Hubbard, M. (1975). Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: Biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 880–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shlosberg, A., Mandery, E., & West, V. (2012). The expungement myth. Albany Law Review, 75, 1229–1241.Google Scholar
  24. Thompson, A. M., Molina, O. R., & Levett, L. M. (2012). After exoneration: An investigation of stigma and wrongfully convicted persons. Albany Law Review, 75, 1373–1413.Google Scholar
  25. Walther, E., & Langer, T. (2010). For whom Pavlov’s bell tolls: Processes underlying evaluative conditioning? In J. P. Forgas, J. Cooper, & W. D. Crano (Eds.), The psychology of attitudes and attitude change: An introductory overview (pp. 59–75). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  26. Westervelt, S., & Cook, K. (2012). Life after death row. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Wihbey, J., & Kille, L. (2015). Excessive or reasonable force by police? Research on law enforcement and racial conflict. Retrieved from http://journalistsresource.org/studies/government/criminal-justice/police-reasonable-force-brutality-race-research-review-statistics

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kyle C. Scherr
    • 1
  • Christopher J. Normile
    • 1
  • Maria Camila Sarmiento
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCentral Michigan UniversityMount PleasantUSA

Personalised recommendations