Advertisement

Journal of Experimental Criminology

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 53–77 | Cite as

The effects of specialized probation and recovery management checkups (RMCs) on treatment participation, substance use, HIV risk behaviors, and recidivism among female offenders: main findings of a 3-year experiment using subject by intervention interaction analysis

  • Christy K. Scott
  • Michael L. Dennis
  • Arthur J. Lurigio
Article

Abstract

Objectives

To examine the effects of specialized probation and recovery management checkups (RMCs) on participation in substance use treatment, substance use, HIV risk behaviors, and recidivism.

Methods

Women (n = 480) released from the Cook County Jail’s Department of Women’s Justice Services were randomly assigned to either an RMC or control condition and interviewed quarterly for 3 years (greater than 90% completion per wave). At the beginning of each quarter, women were classified as currently on probation (n = 1984) or not (n = 2516). Current probation (subject) and experimental condition (intervention nested within probation status) at the beginning of the quarter were used to predict outcomes in the next quarter. Data included self-reports, urinalysis findings, and county and state arrest records.

Results

In the quarter after being on probation (or not), women offenders reported higher rates of participation in substance use treatment and recovery support services, as well as lower rates of substance use and HIV risk behaviors. Nevertheless, they were more likely to commit crimes and be rearrested or reincarcerated. During quarters when the women were not on probation, RMCs were associated with significant increases in participation in substance use treatment and significant reductions in substance use and HIV risk behaviors. However, RMCs had no additional quarterly benefits when women were on probation. Higher levels of substance use treatment, self-help engagement, and reduced substance use predicted reduced recidivism.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the effects of specialized probation and RMCs (when not on probation) on favorable outcomes for criminally involved women with substance use disorders.

Keywords

Probation Community supervision Substance use disorder Recovery management checkups (RMC) Female offenders Woman offenders Reentry Alcohol and other drug use HIV risk behavior Recidivism 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This article was supported by National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) grant DA021174. The authors thank Rod Funk for assistance in preparing the manuscript; the women who participated in the interviews; and the Cook County Jail’s Division 17 staff and administration. The opinions are those of the authors and do not reflect official positions of the government.

References

  1. Adams, S., Leukefeld, C. G., & Peden, A. R. (2008). Substance abuse treatment for women offenders: A research review. Journal of Addictions Nursing, 19, 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, S. M., Peden, A. R., Hall, L. A., Rayens, M. K., Staten, R. R., & Leukefeld, C. G. (2011). Predictors of retention of women offenders in a community-based residential substance abuse treatment program. Journal of Addictions Nursing, 22, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alemagno, S. A. (2001). Women in jail: Is substance abuse treatment enough? American Journal of Public Health, 91, 798–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belenko, S., Langley, S., Crimmins, S., & Chaple, M. (2004). HIV risk behaviors, knowledge, and prevention education among offenders under community supervision: A hidden risk group. AIDS Education and Prevention, 16, 367–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blitz, C. L., Wolff, N., Pan, K. Y., & Pogorzelski, W. (2005). Gender-specific behavioral health and community release patterns among New Jersey prison inmates: Implications for treatment and community reentry. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 1741–1746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bloom, B., Owen, B., & Covington, S. (2004). Women offenders and the gendered effects of public policy. Review of Policy Research, 21, 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2005). Prison statistics: Summary findings. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2004). HIV/AIDS surveillance report, 2003 (15th ed.). Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  9. Charpentier, P. A. (2003). Urn randomization program gRand v1.10. New Haven, CT: Yale University.Google Scholar
  10. Chesney-Lind, M. (1986). “Women and crime”: The female offender. Signs, 12(1), 78–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Colvin, M., Cullen, F. T., & Vander Ven, T. (2002). Coercion, social support, and crime: An emerging theoretical consensus. Criminology, 40, 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Conrad, K. M., Conrad, K. J., Passetti, L. L., Funk, R. R., & Dennis, M. L. (2015). Validation of the Full and Short-Form Self-Help Involvement Scale Against the Rasch Measurement Model. Evaluation Review, 39(4), 395-427.Google Scholar
  13. Cunningham, S., & Kendall, T. D. (2011). Prostitution 2.0: The changing face of sex work. Journal of Urban Economics, 69, 273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Groot, A. S. (2000). HIV infection among incarcerated women: Epidemic behind bars. AIDS Reader, 10, 287–295.Google Scholar
  15. DeHart, D. D. (2008). Pathways to prison: Impact of victimization in the lives of incarcerated women. Violence Against Women, 14, 1362–1381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dennis, M. L., & Scott, C. K. (2012). Four-year outcomes from the Early Re-Intervention (ERI) experiment using recovery management checkups (RMCs). Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 121, 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dennis, M. L., Lennox, R. D., & Foss, M. A. (1997). Practical power analysis for substance abuse health services research. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle, & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 367–405). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dennis, M., Scott, C. K., & Funk, R. (2003a). An experimental evaluation of recovery management checkups (RMC) for people with chronic substance use disorders. Evaluation and Program Planning, 26(3), 339–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dennis, M. L., Titus, J. C., White, M., Unsicker, J., & Hodgkins, D. (2003b). Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN): Administration guide for the GAIN and related measures (5th ed.). Bloomington, IL: Illinois Chestnut Health Systems. Retrieved from: http://www.gaincc.org/gaini.Google Scholar
  20. Elias, G. L., & Ricci, K. (1997). Women in jail: Facility planning issues. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections, US Department of Justice. Retrieved from: https://www.ncjrs.gov/app/abstractdb/AbstractDBDetails.aspx?id=166146.Google Scholar
  21. Escobar, G., & Olson, D. E. (2012). A profile of women released into Cook County communities from jail and prison. Criminal Justice & Criminology: Faculty publications and other works, Paper 8. Retrieved 23 Jul 2014 from: http://ecommons.luc.edu/social_justice/13
  22. Fogel, C. I., & Belyea, M. (1999). The lives of incarcerated women: Violence, substance abuse, and at risk for HIV. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 10, 66–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Freudenberg, N., Moseley, J., Labriola, M., Daniels, J., & Murrill, C. (2007). Comparison of health and social characteristics of people leaving New York City jails by age, gender, and race/ethnicity: Implications for public health interventions. Public Health Reports, 122, 733–743.Google Scholar
  24. Glaze, L. E. (2010). Correctional populations in the United States, 2009. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Program, Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  25. Grella, C. E., & Greenwell, L. (2007). Treatment needs and completion of community-based aftercare among substance-abusing women offenders. Women’s Health Issues, 17, 244–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grella, C. E., Annon, J. J., & Anglin, M. D. (2000). Drug use and risk for HIV among women arrestees in California. AIDS and Behavior, 4, 289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guydish, J., Chan, M., Bostrom, A., Jessup, M. A., Davis, T. B., & Marsh, C. (2011). A randomized trial of probation case management for drug-involved women offenders. Crime and Delinquency, 57, 167–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Herberman, E. J., & Bonczar, T. P. (2015). Probation and parole in the United States, 2013. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from: http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/ppus13.pdf.Google Scholar
  29. Humphreys, K. (2004). Circles of recovery: Self-help organizations for addictions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Inciardi, J. A., Martin, S. S., Butzin, C. A., Hooper, R. M., & Harrison, L. D. (1997). An effective model of prison-based treatment for drug-involved offenders. Journal of Drug Issues, 27, 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Iroh, P. A., Mayo, H., & Nijhawan, A. E. (2015). The HIV care cascade before, during, and after incarceration: a systematic review and data synthesis. American Journal of Public Health, 105(7), e5–e16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Khan, M. R., Wohl, D. A., Weir, S. S., Adimora, A. A., Moseley, C., Norcott, K., Duncan, J., Kaufman, J. S., & Miller, W. C. (2008). Incarceration and risky sexual partnerships in a southern US city. Journal of Urban Health, 85, 100–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. King, E., & Foley, J. E. (2014). Gender-responsive policy development in corrections: What we know and roadmaps for change. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.Google Scholar
  34. Lurigio, A. J., Roque, L., Stalans, L., & Seng, M. (2004). Evaluation of the Cook County Promotion of Women Education and Resources (POWER) Probation Program. Paper presented at the Center for the Advancement of Research, Training, and Education, Loyola University, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  35. Lurigio, A. J., Stalans, L., Roque, L., Seng, M., & Ritchie, J. (2007). The effects of specialized supervision on women probationers: An evaluation of the POWER program. In R. Muraskin (Ed.), It’s a crime: Women and justice (4th ed., pp. 127–145). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  36. Lynch, S. M., Fritch, A., & Heath, N. M. (2012). Looking beneath the surface: The nature of incarcerated women’s experiences of interpersonal violence, treatment needs, and mental health. Feminist Criminology, 7, 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maruschak, L. M. (2004). HIV in prisons, 2001. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved 1 Dec 2010 from: http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/.Google Scholar
  38. Maruschak, L. M. (2012). HIV prisons, 2001–2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  39. Maruszhak, L. M., & Bonczar, T. P. (2014). Probation and parole in the United States, 2012. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  40. McClelland, G. M., Teplin, L. A., Abram, K. M., & Jacobs, N. (2002). HIV and AIDS risk behaviors among female jail detainees: Implications for public health policy. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 818–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McCollister, K. E., French, M. T., Freitas, D. M., Dennis, M. L., Scott, C. K., & Funk, R. R. (2013). Cost-effectiveness analysis of Recovery Management Checkups (RMC) for adults with chronic substance use disorders: evidence from a 4-year randomized trial. Addiction, 108, 2166–2174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Minton, T. D., & Golinelli, D. (2014). Jail inmates at midyear 2013: Statistical tables. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  43. Morash, M., Kashy, D. A., Smith, S. W., & Cobbina, J. E. (2015). The effects of probation or parole agent relationship style and women offenders’ criminogenic needs on offenders’ responses to supervision interactions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 412–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Moyers, T. B., Martin, T., Manuel, J. K., Miller, W. R., & Ernst, D. (2010). Revised Global Scales: Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity 3.1.1 (MITI 3.1.1). Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse and Addictions (CASAA).Google Scholar
  45. Ney, B., Ramirez, R. & Van Dieten, M. (2012). Ten truths that matter when working with justice involved women. Silver Spring, MD: National Resource Center on Justice Involved Women. Retrieved 9 Jul 2015 from: http://cjinvolvedwomen.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Ten_Truths.pdf.
  46. Olson, D. E., & Huddle, K. (2013). An examination of admissions, discharges & the population of the Cook County Jail, 2012. Cook County Sheriff’s Reentry Council Research Bulletin. Chicago: Cook County Sheriff’s Office.Google Scholar
  47. Olson, D. E., & Lurigio, A. J. (2000). Predicting probation outcomes: Factors associated with probation rearrest, revocations, and technical violations during supervision. Justice Research and Policy, 2, 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Oser, C., Knudsen, H., Staton-Tindall, M., & Leukefeld, C. (2009). The adoption of wraparound services among substance abuse treatment organizations serving criminal offenders: The role of a women-specific program. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 103, S82–S90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA, 2015). National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2013 and 2014 detailed tables. Rockville, MD: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. Retrieved from http://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUH-DetTabs2014/NSDUHDetTabs2014.pdf.
  50. Scott, C. K. (2004). A replicable model for achieving over 90% follow-up rates in longitudinal studies of substance abusers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 74, 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Scott, C. K., & Dennis, M. L. (2008). Recovery Management Check-ups (RMC) Procedure Manual. Illinois: Chestnut Health Systems.Google Scholar
  52. Scott, C. K., & Dennis, M. L. (2009). Results from two randomized clinical trials evaluating the impact of quarterly recovery management checkups with adult chronic substance users. Addiction, 104, 959–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Scott, C. K., & Dennis, M. L. (2011). Recovery management checkups with adult chronic substance users. In J. F. Kelly & W. L. White (Eds.), Addiction recovery management: Theory, science, and practice (pp. 87–102). New York: Springer Science.Google Scholar
  54. Scott, C. K., & Dennis, M. L. (2012). The first 90 days following release from jail: Findings from the Recovery Management Checkups for Women Offenders (RMCWO) experiment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 125, 110–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Scott, C. K., Dennis, M. L., & Foss, M. A. (2005). Utilizing recovery management checkups to shorten the cycle of relapse, treatment reentry, and recovery. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 78, 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Scott, C. K., Dennis, M. L., Laudet, A., Funk, R. R., & Simeone, R. S. (2011). Surviving drug addiction: The effect of treatment and abstinence on mortality. American Journal of Public Health, 101, 737–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Scott, C. K., Grella, C. E., Dennis, M. L., & Funk, R. R. (2014). Predictors of recidivism over 3 years among substance-using women released from jail. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 1257–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Scott, C. K., Dennis, M. L., & Lurigio, A. J. (2016). HIV risk among female detainees: A description of practices, perceptions, and knowledge. Journal of Forensic Social Work.Google Scholar
  59. Seng, M., & Lurigio, A. J. (2005). Probation officers’ views on supervising women probationers. Women and Criminal Justice, 16, 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Singer, M. I., Bussey, J., Song, L. Y., & Lunghofer, L. (1995). The psychosocial issues of women serving time in jail. Social Work, 40, 103–113. doi: 10.1093/sw/40.1.103.Google Scholar
  61. Staton-Tindall, M., Duvall, J., McNees, E., Walker, R., & Leukefeld, C. (2011). Outcomes following prison and jail-based treatment among women residing in metro and non-metro communities following release. Journal of Drug Issues, 41, 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stevens, J., Zierler, S., Cram, V., Dean, D., Mayer, K., & DeGroot, A. (1995). Risks for HIV infection in incarcerated women. Journal of Women’s Health, 4, 569–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Taxman, F. S., Perdoni, M. L., & Harrison, L. D. (2007). Drug treatment services for adult offenders: The state of the state. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 32, 329–254.Google Scholar
  64. Teplin, L. A., Mericle, A. A., McClelland, G. M., & Abram, K. M. (2003). HIV and AIDS risk behaviors in juvenile detainees: Implications for public health policy. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 906–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Titus, J. C., Smith, D. C., Dennis, M. L., Ives, M., Twanow, L., & White, M. K. (2012). Impact of a training and certification program on the quality of interviewer-collected self-report assessment data. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 42, 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wechsberg, W. M., Lam, W. K. K., Zule, W. A., & Bobashev, G. (2004). Efficacy of a woman-focused intervention to reduce HIV risk and increase self-sufficiency among African American crack abusers. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 1165–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wexler, H. K., Prendergast, M. L., & Melnick, G. (2004). Introduction to a special issue: Correctional drug treatment outcomes—Focus on California. The Prison Journal, 84, 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yard, S.S. (2015). Relationship dynamics as inconsistent mediators of traumatic stress and condomless sex among jail-detained women. Doctoral dissertation. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.Retrieved on 2/16/17 from https://dlib.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/bitstream/handle/1773/34146/Yard_washington_0250E_14970.pdf?.
  69. Young, A. M., Boyd, C., & Hubbell, A. (2000). Prostitution, drug use, and coping with psychological distress. Journal of Drug Issues, 30, 789–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zierler, S., & Krieger, N. (1997). Reframing women’s risk: Social inequalities and HIV infection. Annual Review of Public Health, 18, 401–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christy K. Scott
    • 1
  • Michael L. Dennis
    • 1
  • Arthur J. Lurigio
    • 2
  1. 1.Lighthouse InstituteChestnut Health Systems, Chicago & NormalChicagoUSA
  2. 2.College of Arts and SciencesLoyola University ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations